ANTONIO MARK MCCOY SR. "ANTON-ANUTE-THUTMOSE-RAMSES" |
DYNASTY: |
PHARAOH: |
1ST
|
Djer
|
3RD
|
Netjerkhet or Djoser
|
4TH
|
Nebmaet or Senefru
|
Menkaure or Mykerinos
|
|
5TH
|
Shepseskare or Isi
|
Djedkare or Isesi
|
|
Wadjtawy or Unas
|
|
6TH
|
Seheteptawy or Teti |
Pepi I
|
|
Merenre or Nemtyemsaf I
|
|
11TH
|
Mentuhotep II
|
13TH
|
Hor
|
17TH
|
Taa II or Seqenenre |
18TH
|
Ahmose I or Ahmosis I |
Amenhotep I or Amenophis
I
|
|
Thutmose I or Tuthmosis I
|
|
Thutmose II or Tuthmosis II
|
|
Thutmose III or Tuthmosis III |
|
Menhotep II or Amenophis II |
|
Thutmose IV or Tuthmosis IV |
|
Amenhotep III or Amenophis III |
|
Smenkhkare
|
|
Tutankhamun
|
|
19TH
|
Rameses I
|
Seti I or Sethos I |
|
Rameses II |
|
Merenptah
|
|
Seti II or Sethos II
|
|
Siptah
|
|
20TH
|
Sethnakhte
|
Rameses III |
|
Rameses IV
|
|
Rameses V
|
|
Rameses VI
|
|
Rameses XI |
|
21ST
|
Pinudhem I
|
Psusennes I
|
|
Amenemopet
|
|
22ND
|
Shoshenq II
|
Harsiese
|
|
25TH
|
Taharqa
|
29TH
|
Nepherites I
|
MY
EGYPTIAN D.N.A. IN IRELAND AND SCOTLAND (ANCIENT DAL RIATA OR ARGYLL):
TO FURTHER NOW. MY ANCIENT EGYPTIAN ANCESTRAL D.N.A. THAT IS SHOWN TO HAD BEEN IN WESTERN "SCOTLAND" AND IN NORTHERN "IRELAND" (THE LAND OF ANCIENT "DAL RIATA" OR "ARGYLL") AS WELL. "THE LAND OF SCOTLAND" ITSELF THAT WAS NAMED AFTER ONE OF MY ANCIENT EGYPTIAN ANCESTORS. HER BEING THE "EGYPTIAN PRINCESS "MERITATEN" OR "SCOTA". AND !SHE OF WHO WAS NONE OTHER THAN ONE OF THE "6" DAUGHTERS OF THE FAMOUS EGYPTIAN PHARAOH "AKHENATEN", "ACHENCRES", OR "CHENCRES". - MERITATEN (SCOTA) THE "FIRST QUEEN OF SCOTLAND"
-!AH. SO "MERITATEN" WAS THE FAMED "SCOTA". THE "FIRST QUEEN OF THE LAND OF SCOTLAND". AND HER KNOW FATHER "AKHENATEN" WAS "ACHENCRES" OR "CHENCRES". AND "BOTH" BEING MY ANCIENT BLOOD RELATED PEOPLES. THE "EGYPTIAN'S". SOME OF WHICH HAD "SETTLED" "SPAIN". THEN IN "IRELAND". IN THE "ARGYLL SCOTLAND REGION". THE "ARGYLL SCOTLAND REGION" BEING THE BIRTHPLACE OF "SCOTLAND". "ARGYLL". !EXACTLY WHERE MY ANCIENT EGYPTIAN ANCESTRAL IRISH AND SCOTTISH D.N.A. IS FOUND (AS IT WAS SHOWN BELOW). WHICH IS NO GOD DAMN COINCIDENT. !NO. !AH. THE FIRST "BLACK EUROPEAN'S". WHICH COULD "DEFINITELY" EXPLAIN MY ANCIENT EGYPTIAN ANCESTRAL D.N.A. THERE. THIS OF WHICH IS SHOWN HERE BELOW IN MY EGYPTIAN D.N.A. ANCESTRY. !THAT OF WHICH MATCHES WITH THE D.N.A. OF "AKHENATEN". AND ONE OF HIS DAUGHTERS "MERITATEN". !SHE OF WHO WAS THE FIRST QUEEN OF SCOTLAND. AND AN ANCESTOR OF MINE. - NOW AS THE ANCIENT LEGEND GOES. PRINCESS "MERITATEN" WHO HAD "FLED" EGYPT
AFTER HER FATHER "AKHENATEN",
WAS
"OVER-THROWN",
AND
"MURDERED".
!SHE
AND
HER
!BLACK
ATHENIAN
PRINCE
HUSBAND
"GATHELOS". "GATHELOS"
OF WHO WAS THE "NAME-SAKE" OF THE FIRST "GAELIC TRIBES"/"GATTHEI
TRIBES"/"GAELS" (WHO WERE
THE SAME AS THE GAULS).
!THEY OF
WHO'S LATER "MIX-RACE DESCENDANTS". WENT-ON TO CONQUER WHAT IS THE
COUNTRY NAMED "FRANCE" TODAY. BEFORE THE "ROMANS" HAD CONQUERED THEM
LATER IN "CAESAR'S" TIME. !AFTER CAESAR'S TIME. !LATER IT WAS "JOSEPHUS" THAT HAD RECORDED THE RACE OF THE "LATER"
GAULS THEN. AS BEING "WHITE" IN RACE. !THEY OF WHOM WERE THE "WHITE"
INVADERS, OF WHOM HAD "TAKEN-OVER" THE AREA. LONG AFTER THE !FIRST
"BLACK" GAULS HAD COME BEFORE THEM.
- LONG BEFORE THEN "MERITATEN" AND "GATHELOS". ALONG WITH A LARGE NUMBER OF THEIR FOLLOWERS, IT WAS WRITTEN IN "EGYPTIAN HISTORY". HAD INITIALLY SAILED-ON TO "MOROCCO". AND THEN ON TO "SPAIN". AND THEN ON TO "IRELAND". AND THEN ON TO THE "ARGYLL" REGION OF "SCOTLAND". WHICH EGYPTIAN ARTIFACTS OF "PROOF" FOUND IN EACH OF THE SAID COUNTRIES. THAT ARE TALKED ABOUT BELOW IN THE TABLE HERE: -
THESE ARTIFACTS OF "PROOF" FOUND IN EACH
OF THE SAID COUNTRIES. !THAT "PROVES" EXACTLY THAT TODAY. !NONE OF
THE ABOVE
COUNTRIES THAT WERE NAMES OF SUCH BACK THEN THOUGH. !OF COURSE !NOT.
- "MERITATEN" AND "GATHELOS" WHO HAD BECOME KING AND QUEEN OF "ARGYLL" AND "DAL RIATA" THEN. THEM HAVING THE SONS; "HYBER", "EBER", "EREMON", AND "AMAIRGEN". !THEY OF WHOM HAD ALL CONQUESTED THE LAND NAMED "IRELAND" TODAY. "HYBER" BEGINNING THE CONQUEST. AND "EBER", "EREMON", AND "AMAIRGEN" COMPLETING THE CONQUEST. THE OLD NAME OF "IRELAND" THEN-AFTER THEIR CONQUEST. BEING NAMED "HIBERNIA". NAMED AFTER THE SON "HYBER". !AH. BECAUSE !HE OF WHO BEGAN THE CONQUEST OF IRELAND. !BUT THE "CONQUEST" OF "WHOM" YOU MIGHT ASK HERE? AGAINST THE "FOMORIAN'S". !THAT'S WHO. -
- MY D.N.A. AND AMARNA EGYPTIAN MUMMY D.N.A. IN "FINLAND" LONG AFTER THAT. DURING THE "18TH DYNASTY". "HYBER", "EBER", "EREMON", AND "AMAIRGEN". HAD ALL CONQUESTED THE LAND NAMED "IRELAND" TODAY. !BUT. THE SCOTTISH LAND OF "ARGYLL". THAT WAS LATER "LOST" VIA INVASION'S BY "CELTS" FROM THE EUROPEAN MAINLAND. WHICH WAS AROUND "500 B.C." AND ON THEN. AND !THAT TOO BEING THE TIME WHEN THE SAME "CELTS" HAD INVADED THE LAND OF "IRELAND". AND BEFORE THAT PARTICULAR TIME. THERE WERE ENTIRELY "NO" "WHITE PEOPLES" OR "WHITE TRIBES" IN "SCOTLAND" AND IN "IRELAND". AND NEITHER WERE THERE UPON THE "BRITISH ISLES" THEN EITHER. - AND THEN-AFTER THAT. IT WAS THE "ROMANS" WHO HAD INVADED AND CONQUESTED THE "BRITISH ISLES". BETWEEN 55 B.C. TO 96 A.D. !BUT. MANY OF THE ORIGINAL DESCENDANTS OF THE SONS OF; "HYBER", "EBER", "EREMON", AND "AMAIRGEN". AND OF THE "GAELIC TRIBES"/"GATTHEI TRIBES"/"GAELS". HAD "STAYED" IN BOTH LANDS. SOME OF WHOM BECAME KINGS IN "ARGYLL" AND "DAL RIATA". !BEFORE, !DURING, AND !AFTER THE ROMAN CONQUEST THEY DID. BACK THEN WHEN THE SCOTTISH "PICTS" (!THEY OF WHOM HAD ORIGINATED FROM SCANDINAVIA. THE "ORIGINAL SCANDINAVIAN'S" BEING PEOPLES OF MULTI-RACES "THEN". !BUT. A "BLACK RACE PEOPLES" BEFORE THAT TIME THOUGH. !THEY OF WHOM WERE DESCENDANTS OF "EGYPTIAN'S" AND OF "CANAANITE'S". FROM A MUCH EARLIER TIME. FROM THE EGYPTIAN "3RD DYNASTY" AND PRIOR.) !THEY OF WHOM HAD SUCCESSFULLY "FOUGHT-AGAINST" THE ROMANS FOR ALL THOSE YEARS. IN ORDER TO RETAIN THEIR "EASTERN PART/S" OF "SCOTLAND" THEN. AS THEY DID. - !BEFORE AND THEN-AFTER THAT. !BEFORE AND AFTER THE ROMANS HAD "ABANDONED" THE "BRITISH ISLES" (IN 410 A.D.). THE FOLLOWING "BLACK" AND/OR "MULATTO" SCOTTISH KINGS RULED SCOTLAND. !THIS PARTICULAR ROYAL SCOTTISH ANCESTRY. THAT LEAD-UP-TO THE "BLACK SCOTTISH KING DUB/DUBH". !YES. !THIS BEING HIS ROYAL SCOTTISH ANCESTRY, OF "BLACK" AND/OR "MULATTO" KINGS: - THE BLACK SCOTTISH KINGS OF ARGYLL: 360 A.D. AENGUS FERT MAC 380 A.D. EOCHAID MUINREMUIR 400 A.D. ERC FERGUS MOR EOCH VA DOMNAILL EOCH MAC ECHACH AED MAC ECHDACH 781 A.D. EOCH MAC AEDA 837 A.D. ALPIN MAC ECHDACH 858 A.D. KENNETH I (MAC ALPIN) CONSTANTIC MAC CINAEDA DONALD II MALCOLM I 962 A.D. DUB/DUBH !NOW. !IF THESE "BLACK" AND/OR "MULATTO" SCOTTISH KINGS "WERE" OR "WERE NOT"? "THE DIRECT DESCENDANTS" OF "MERITATEN"? IS A "COMPLETE MYSTERY" TODAY TO "ME"? AND "I" HIGHLY "DOUBT" THAT THEY WERE, "SOMEWHAT"? !BECAUSE !FIRST. LEGEND TELLS ABOUT HOW "MERITATEN". HAD "LEFT" SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN IRELAND. AND HAD "FINALLY" SETTLED IN SOUTHERN IRELAND. !BUT. SOME OF THEIR ROYAL DESCENTS HAD REMAINED IN SCOTLAND AND IN NORTHERN IRELAND THOUGH. SIMPLY BECAUSE THE "D.N.A." OF SUCH PEOPLES STILL EXISTS THERE TO THIS VERY DAY. "D.N.A." THAT "MY" VERY "D.N.A." MATCHES WITH. AND THAT'S "EXACTLY" HOW "I" KNOW OF THIS ALL. AND IT BEING ROYAL EGYPTIAN "D.N.A.". - !BUT. IT'S ALSO A WELL KNOWN HISTORICAL !FACT. THAT MANY OF THE FIRST SCOTTISH KINGS IN THAT EARLIER TIME. WERE "INDEED" DESCENDANTS OF "NUBIAN LEGIONARIES" (THE "NUBIAN'S" THAT I'LL TALK ABOUT LATER BELOW) THAT HAD ONCE PATROLLED IN BRITANNIA FOR ROME !PRIOR. !PRIOR TO ROMES "PULL-OUT" OF BRITANNIA. AND THEM BEING "NON-ROYAL BLOOD NUBIAN'S". WHO HAD "INDEED" TAKEN SCOTTISH PICT "LEADERSHIP" POSITIONS THEN-AFTER. AND THEN "KINGSHIP". - THE PICTS THAT WERE "FINALLY" DEFEATED IN "840 A.D." BY KENNETH I (MAC ALPIN). AND "THAT" PARTICULAR TIME MARKING THE "TRUE" ORIGIN OF TODAY'S "SCOTLAND". OR OF TODAY'S SCOTTISH BOUNDARIES. KENNETH "I" (MAC ALPIN) BEING LISTED "ABOVE" OF COURSE. AND HIM BEING AN ANCESTOR OF "KENNETH DUBH". AND BECAUSE OF SUCH. IT WAS A "BLACK MAN" THAT WAS RESPONSIBLE OF THE ORIGIN OF TODAY'S "SCOTLAND". - !BUT LONG !BEFORE (THOUSANDS OF YEARS !PRIOR) ALL OF !THEM. WAS ONE OF "MY" GREAT ANCESTORS "MERITATEN". !SHE OF WHOM THAT "I'M" "98.999999%" PERCENT ALIKE. AND THE PARTICULAR "D.N.A." "I'M" TALKING ABOUT HERE. BEING THE "GLOBAL GENETIC MATCH ATD.N.A.":
NOTE THAT ATD.N.A. STANDS FOR "AUTOSOMAL D.N.A." - Accuracy of tests: - Autosomal
DNA tests can be used to confirm relationships with a high level of
accuracy for parent/child relationships and all relationships up to the
second cousin level. And for all relationships additional contextual
and genealogical information is required to confirm the nature of the
relationship. For genealogical relationships between second
cousins once removed and 5th cousins. A more careful approach is
necessary and data needs to be collected from multiple family members.
For relationships at the 4th cousin once removed to 5th cousin level
you may need to test 10 to 20 or more first and second cousins . And
see how much autosomal DNA they share with a potential 4th cousin once
removed. Or a potential 5th cousin in order to have sufficient data to
generate a statistically significant average amount of autosomal DNA
that is shared among the entire group. Assuming that you are dealing
with a non-endogamous population.
-- !OK. IN !FACT. ATD.N.A. THAT'S !NOT REALLY "ACCURATE" ENOUGH TO GO BACK PAST "500 YEARS TIME". !IF !THAT? SO HOW IN THE HELL DO "I" KNOW THAT "I'M" "98.999999%" PERCENT ALIKE "MERITATEN"? AS WELL AS THE "OTHER ROYAL EGYPTIAN'S"? IS BECAUSE THE "D.N.A. MATERIAL" THAT WAS TAKEN FROM THEIR "MUMMIFIED BONES". MAKES THEM ALMOST ALIKE THEY'RE !STILL "LIVING" HERE TODAY. AND ALMOST ALIKE THEY'RE "MY"; IMMEDIATE FAMILY, GRAND PARENTS, FIRST OR SECOND COUSINS. !YEA. !THAT "ACCURATE". !BECAUSE "I" HAD THE "EXACT D.N.A." FROM THEIR "MUMMIFIED REMAINS". IN ORDER TO "MATCH-IT-UP" WITH "MY" D.N.A. !THAT'S WHY.
!SO. AS I HAD SAID EARLIER "ABOVE". MANY OF THE FIRST SCOTTISH KINGS IN THAT EARLIER TIME. WERE "INDEED" DESCENDANTS OF "NUBIAN" LEGIONARIES THAT HAD ONCE PATROLLED IN BRITANNIA FOR ROME. !PRIOR TO ROMES "PULL-OUT" OF BRITANNIA THEN. AND THEM BEING "NON-ROYAL BLOOD NUBIAN'S". WHO HAD "INDEED" TAKEN SCOTTISH PICT "LEADERSHIP" POSITIONS THEN-AFTER. AND "KINGSHIP". !BUT. THEY WERE ALSO "MOORS" AND "MOORISH-NUBIAN'S" WHO CAME AFTER THE MOORISH INVASION OF EUROPE. THEM BEING "NON-ROYAL BLOOD NUBIAN'S, MOORS, AND NUBIAN-MOORS". WHO HAD "INDEED" TAKEN SCOTTISH PICT "LEADERSHIP" POSITIONS THEN-AFTER. AND "KINGSHIP" IN "SCOTLAND". AND "WERE NOT" "THE DIRECT EGYPTIAN DESCENDANTS" OF "MERITATEN". AND NEITHER WERE THEY OF "GATHELOS". - "I" MYSELF IS "SURE" THOUGH. THAT "I" MYSELF. "IS" INDEED A DIRECT DESCENDANT OF "MERITATEN". VIA "D.N.A." !PROOF. AND SO THEN. AM I A DESCENDANT OF THESE SCOTTISH KINGS AS WELL? AS WELL AS A "POSSIBLE" RELATIVE OF OTHER EUROPEAN ROYAL FAMILIES? !BUT ONLY "D.N.A." CAN AND WILL TELL ME !THAT TRUTH. !IF IT IS A "TRUTH"? !BUT. NOTICE THE ROYAL TITLE "MAC" IN MANY OF THEIR NAMES ABOVE. !THIS BEING THE "FIRST" ORIGIN OF THE FAMOUS SCOTTISH "MAC" SURNAME BEGINNINGS. MEANING THAT THE "MAC" IN MANY OF THE SCOTTISH SUR NAMES. IS OF "BLACK TRIBAL/CLAN" ORIGIN. "MAC" WHICH MEANS "SON OF". AND MY SUR NAME OF "MCCOY". WAS ORIGINATED FROM THE SUR NAMES "MACKAY" AND "MAC". |
THE BLACK TRUTH By Antonio Mark McCoy Sr. © Antonio Mark McCoy Sr. 2003, 2004, 2005. - Scottish Royality I also found that my own
"McCoy" blood line from Scottish Royalty, is indeed connected to
Obama's. Obama's known Scottish Bloodline is from the Scottish King
William I ("William the Lion", "the Rough"). Who ruled Scotland from 1165 to 1214.
King Malcolm IV had ruled Scotland before him, from 1153 to 1165. King Malcolm IV of Scotland in
1160, who defeated Malcolm (Máel
Coluim) MacEth, Earl of Ross. Whose daughter
Gormflaith married the Norse Harold, Earl
of Caithness. Their son was called MacHeth
afterward (Adding the "H" from "Harold" to "Eth"). He who had later raised
to the chieftainship of his Clan Mackay in
1250. Historian's in Scotland seem to have such a hard time seeing
these simple name and Royal Clan name changes and similarities. Which
explains the entire mystery. Which I have unraveled here below. First
with the fact that the Scottish King Alexander I, is
the same person as the Scottish Mormaer (a Scottish Regional Leader
equal to a Scottish Earl) Beth.
Who was also known as Eth and Aed. The
letters he used, "Aed", were merely a disguise he used then.
One to hide the fact that he had a Bastard Son then. That son who was
none other than our Malcolm MacEth. He himself who also had another name of
Malcolm mac
Alaxandair. Showing that he was the Bastard Son of King Alexander then.
He was well know as being the Kings Bastard Son then. Which is why the
King later made him Earl (Mormaer) of Ross.
!But. His Uncle King David. Who took-over the Scottish Throne in 1124, was at war with him. Malcolm who had attempted to take the Throne away from King David in 1124. After he fought against him in two sufficiently fierce battles. But he lost in war. He was later captured in 1134. Them imprisoned until 1156. Later he emerged as Malcolm MacEth. !Why? Because King David must have made it part of his release agreement? For him to "stay" a Bastard Son of Alexander. And to "drop" the name Malcolm mac Alaxandair. And to "not" challenge him for the Throne again. Why didn't he simply kill him instead? Because King David knew he was a Blood Relative. He knew. And him keeping Malcolm alive is fact of that. Malcolm was restored as Earl of Ross. But it was his son Domnall (not him). Who later lead a revolt against King Malcolm IV of Scotland in 1160. Domnall who was his son from Somerled's sister. She who had his daughter also. Named Gormflaith. She with the Viking name, because she was half Viking. Like Domnall. Then Domnall had a son named Adam mac Domnaill. Who was killed in battle. Domnall was the one who later "began" the Clan MacKay. After he finally saw there was no hope in ever regaining the Earl-ship of Ross, or the Kingship of Scotland then. With this name change, the MacHeth's disappear from history in the years around 1200. Until one Kenneth (who was probably Gormflaith's son?) MacHeth appeared in 1215 to challenge the Throne again. He was defeated by King Alexander II's Forces and possibly killed then? Ending the MacHeth's claim to the Scottish Throne and Earl-ship then. !But. Long before they all lived and ruled, a "BLACK SCOTTISH KING". King Dub. The King of the Picts. Ruled Scotland from 962 to 967. His son Kenneth III took-over the Scottish Thrown in 997 to 1005. Here now are the list of Scottish Kings following Dub. To Alexander II. From two sides of the Scottish Royal House that existed then. Who were both constantly at war with one another then. One side being the Black Scots. And the other being the White Scots. Dub (962 - 967)· Cuilén · Amlaíb · Kenneth II · Constantine III · Kenneth III (997 - 1005)· Malcolm II · Duncan I · Macbeth · Lulach · Malcolm III (1058 - 1093) · Donald II · Duncan II · Donald III · Edgar · Alexander I · David I (1124 - 1153) · Malcolm IV (1153 - 1165) · William I (1165 - 1214) · Alexander II (1214 - 1249) · It is a historical fact that King Dub lived and reigned over certain black divisions in Scotland. And that a race known as "the sons of the blacks" succeeded him in history. Constantine III was Kenneth III's 4th Cousin. And Malcolm II his 1st Cousin. Who killed all of Kenneth's Black Male Descendants after Kenneth died in battle. But Kenneth's Mulatto Grand daughter Grouch survived, to give birth to Mulatto King Lulach. Lulach was assassinated by the White Scot Royals. An assassination that gave power to Malcolm III here below: Back to Kenneth MacHeth now. Maybe he
escaped to further the MacKay Clan
then? Maybe he was the one to rise-up the Clan in 1250 thereafter?
Finishing what Domnall started. There are no records of Kenneth MacHeth's
death.
Now Obama's
and my Common Scottish
Ancestor was King Malcolm III. Who ruled Scotland from 1058-1093.
Domnall was the smart one who began another Clan, prior to that. Around
1200 (or earlier, more than likely) The MacKay Clan.
Who were actually formed before 1250. Because he was long since dead
before the year 1250. From 1260 to 1815,
till
the
Battle of
Waterloo.
The MacKay
Clan
had
been
actively
engaged
in
Wars
and
Clan
disputes.
Showing
their
ancestry
from
Domnall.
He
who
was
half
Viking.
!But.
in
1650
one
John
McCoy
(which
is
just
the
American
version
of
the
name
MacKay
or
MacCay).
Arrives
in
Virginia,
and
thus
begins
the
African
American
McCoy
sir
name.
- During slavery there were, of course, frequent mixed race births. Mostly all resulting from the rape of enslaved Black Women by White Male Slave Owners. Between 1850 and 1860, the Mulatto Slave population increased by a whopping 67 percent. In contrast, the Black Slave population increased by only 20 percent then. That's how much the White Slave Owners were having sexual intercourse with Black Slave Women then. As they were giving their White European Ancestry to us then. And this is exactly why today we "CAN" now claim their White European Ancestry. As well as our African Ancestry. All to their disliking. It's a "FACT". Mostly all of us African American's. And a lot of Afro-European. Have White European Blood within them. It all depends who held their Ancestors as Slaves way back then. If they were held at all? My mothers family "WERE NOT", and was "NEVER" held in slavery here in the America's. Because they were in the Caribbean. My fathers are the Slaves of the Virginia McCoy Clan. And so, I now. Not by choice though. Have White Scottish Blood within my Veins. !Oh well. Since I do. I might as well "CLAIM" the same damn Scottish Ancestry that they all do. As I consistently challenge them to preform a D.N.A. Test on me to prove all of that, just a little bit more. I already know it's a fact. Via Genealogy Searches. They know it as well, but they keep very quite about it though. Don't they? Slavery in Virginia began in 1640, but wasn't actually official until 1661. And you know who your Slave Masters were. Now you do. Where they originated from by their sir names. Which are your sir names today in America. And during those times in captivity, our Young Black Women had sexual intercourse with the White Slavers, on average, once a week. Forcefully or not they did? Which was more of the forceful nature then. !Yea. I'm related to "WHITE" Scottish Royalty. But White Peoples don't want to hear "that". Do they? They say how it's unbelievable, and all. !Yet. It wasn't so unbelievable when the White Scottish Descendants of the Scottish Kings. Who migrated here to the America's. Then took Black Slave's. Then "RAPED" the Young Black Slave Girls at night. Secretly fathering their Mulatto Children later. By the "MILLIONS" then. !No. That wasn't so hard to believe. Was it? And "THERE" is where my McCoy Black Family got our White Scottish Blood. Believe "THAT". As is the same case for many a Black American Family. Obama's, etc... His being a bit more obvious though. Since he's a Direct Mulatto. And I'm a Grandchild of one. Who would know these things days? If it wasn't for D.N.A. And the Mighty Mighty Internet. - The Real McCoy AnceSTORY: By Antonio M McCoy - 2004 The McCoy surname originated from the Scottish Highlander Clan surname MacKay. The Scottish MacKay surname can be traced back to 1250 Scotland and is said to have came from Irish Royalty before that. After the migration of members of the Clan to America, the MacKay surname was changed to McCoy. One of the earliest members of that Clan in America was John McCoy, who arrived in Maryland around 1650. His arrival is possibly the earliest known origin of the American McCoy surname? - The African American McCoy name began in the Maryland/Virginia area when John McCoy purchased slaves and/or indentured servants there. His slaves and/or indentured servants were used to clear-away the forested areas in the area, making them farm-able for other Europeans. Three generations later his grandson "Old William" McCoy was born in Maryland around 1750. He inherited slaves and passed them along to his sons. And so the African American McCoy name continued. - Old William migrated to Pike County Kentucky after the new land opened-up for further expansion. Around 1790 his son Daniel McCoy was born, he later became the father of; Randolph, Asa Harmon, and Pharmer McCoy. They, and their descendants were involved in the Hatfield/McCoy feud. And some of my peoples were still their slaves then. While the majority of the African American McCoy's were slaves to the Kentucky McCoy's, there were a few from the ancestry that were free. They gained their freedom in Virginia as indentured servants. In 1801 Westmoreland County Virginia , James, Bennet, George, and Rodham McCoy were listed as free men. These men were also listed as Revolutionary War Veterans. In 1803 Augusta County, Virginia, Hanna McCoy was listed as a free person of color. In 1830 Urbana City, Ohio, George McCoy. In 1840 Buckingham County, Virginia, Anthony McCoy. In 1852 Richmond, Virginia, James McCoy. Another freed McCoy appeared in 1808 Virginia, she was Mary McCoy. She later became the wife of Madison Hemings in 1831/1832. Madison Hemings was one of the alleged sons (born in 1805) to Sally Hemings and "Thomas Jefferson". He was also freed by his alleged father Thomas Jefferson. Mary McCoy and Madison Hemings migrated to Pike County,Ohio, there they had nine children. Sarah, Catherine, Thomas Eston, Harriet, Mary Ann, William Beverly, James Madison, Julia Ann, and Ellen Wayles Hemings. They might not carry the McCoy surname but they do still carry the McCoy bloodline, in fact this was the beginning of the McCoy/Jefferson blood Line. Harriet married James Butler, and later Henry Speers in Fayette County, Ohio. Ellen Wayles married Andrew Robert's and moved to California. So part of the McCoy/Jefferson blood Line exists in some of the Hemings, the Butlers, and the Speers of Ohio, and the Roberts of California. Enough about Thomas Jefferson's Blood Line, let's talk about the rest of the McCoy's. Around 1820 E McCoy (probably Ezekiel McCoy, who was born in Maryland in 1777) had taken part of the Kentucky McCoy family (six people including himself), along with two slaves to Wilcox County Alabama. These two slave were the direct ancestors of my McCoy family. The other African American McCoy Slaves stayed in the Kentucky Virginia area, but many others migrated into the Carolina's, Georgia, Tennessee, and Ohio. Then in 1837 two of the Kentucky slaves (George and Mildred/Emillia McCoy) escaped by way of the Underground Rail Road, that ran along the Ohio Indiana borders. They escaped the slave states in America and relocated in Colchester Canada. On 2 May 1843 or1844 their son Elijah McCoy was born there. Elijah later became an inventor, and later he attended school in Scotland and became an Engineer. After the war Elijah McCoy moved across the river to the Detroit, Michigan area. Marandy McCoy, from the Alabama Freed Slave McCoy's moved into neighboring Marengo County Alabama in 1866. She was my great great grandmother. I never located any Records on my great grandmother or great grand father though, in my genealogy search. One that took me 2 years to complete.- Nellie McCoy, my grandmother was born on 24 November 1914. My grandmother was a Mulatto Child, so her father or her mother was Caucasian. As I said above, I never located any Records on my great grandmother or great grand father in my genealogy search. But my grand mothers skin pigment was so light that she could have passed for a Caucasian woman. This was not uncommon in her time. - Generations before her time Mulatto's were very common, because the Slave Masters had sexual intercourse with (raped) the African American Slave Girls and Women. Today you have peoples saying that African American's have only inherited the slave masters surnames, !that's a lie. They also inherited their Blood Lines. This is another reason why many African American's today have much lighter skin pigments than their African cousins. Many of them have an equal mix of strong African and European Genes, regardless of their skin pigment. Their hair texture, their facial features, etc... And "therefore", the African American McCoy's (MacKay's) in my family, do indeed have Royal Scottish Blood. Which dates back to Harold, Earl of Caithness. And his son MacHeth. Who was raised to the chieftainship of his Clan Mackay in 1250. Now do any White McCoy's or MacKay's wish to challenge my finding, via D.N.A.? I doubt it. Because they know the truth will come-out then. !But. I contacted Scottish MacKay's and McCoy's many years ago. And surprisingly to me, they welcomed me with open-arms. Unlike the White McCoy's and MacKay's in America. - The next generation in my families ancestry was my father Johnnie McCoy, he was born in neighboring Sumter County Alabama on 20 February 1934. After his birth and youth my grandmother relocated the Detroit Michigan. She resided there until her death on 6 April 1989. - I myself was born in Detroit Michigan on the 25th of March 1959. It was a coincidence that I visited the country of Scotland later in 1988. During my visit there I found it hard to believe that the Scottish peoples could become the cruel slave masters that some of their American descendants were, but the key word here is "America". America has always been a harsh cruel ethnic melting pot for racial tensions. A place where people seem to openly express their blatant and un-justful racism towards "one another". |
!LONG !LONG BEFORE THOSE TIMES. AS "I" HAD ALREADY EXPLAINED ABOVE. "MALCOLM III" HAD "GIVEN-RISE" TO THE "CLAN MACKAY". AS YOU SAW ABOVE. AND LATER TOO FAMOUS SCOTTISH AND ENGLISH MONARCHY. "MALCOLM III" OF WHOM WAS A "MULATTO". OR OF "MOORIST" DESCENT. !BECAUSE. HIS DESCENDANTS THAT HAD "GIVEN-RISE" TO THE "STEWARTS". THE "STEWARTS" THAT WAS THE ROYAL FAMILY OF "KING JAMES I", AND HIS DESCENDANTS. !THEY OF WHOM WERE "MOORISH" AND/OR "MULATTO'S". !AH. "MULATTO'S" BECAUSE OF THE PRIOR "RACE-MIXING" OF THE PREVIOUS "BLACK" AND "WHITE" SCOTTISH ROYAL HOUSE'S (THAT HAD COME LONG BEFORE THEIR TIMES). THE "BLACK" AND "WHITE" SCOTTISH ROYAL HOUSE'S. THAT HAD "WARED" AGAINST ONE ANOTHER. AS "I" HAD SAID ABOVE AS WELL. !BUT "BLOODLINES" INTERMINGLED THOUGH. IN MANY CASES THEY DID WAY BACK THEN. WHICH "PROVES" SUCH WITH THE "MOORISH" AND/OR "MULATTO'S" ROYAL HOUSE OF THE "STEWARTS". !AH. NOW WHERE DOES "MY" "SMALL" "SMALL" SHARE OF THAT PARTICULAR BLOODLINE EXIST? YOU MIGHT ASK? IT DOES WITH THE "MACKAY CLAN". "THAT" OF WHICH WHERE "MY" "SURNAME" ORIGINATES FROM. AS "I" HAD ALREADY EXPLAINED ABOVE ALSO. "I" OF WHO "AM" GENETICALLY RELATED TO THE "ORIGINAL "BLACK" BRITISH ROYAL FAMILY". VIA KING "MALCOLM III" (THROUGH SCOTTISH "MACKAY" BLOOD). |
http://www.royal.gov.uk/historyofthemonarchy/scottish
monarchs(400ad-1603)/theearlyscottishmonarchs/malcolmiii.aspx - Scottish Monarchs (400 AD - 1603) The
early
Scottish
Monarchs
Kenneth
I (r.
843-858)
Donald
I
(r.
858-862)
Constantine
I
(r.
862-877)
Aed
(r. 877-878)
Giric
(r.
878-889)
Donald
II
(r.
889-900)
Constantine
II
(r.
900-943)
Malcolm
I
(r.943-954)
Indulf
(r.
954-962)
Dubh or Duff
(r. 962-966)
Culen
(r.
966-971)
Kenneth
II
(r.
971-995)
Constantine III
(r. 995-997)
Kenneth III
(r. 971-997)
Malcolm II (r.
1005-1034)
Duncan
I
(r.
1034-1040)
Macbeth
(r.
1040-1057)
Lulach (r.
1057-1058)
Malcolm III
(r. 1058-1093)
Donald
III
(r.
1093-1094,
1094-1097)
Descendants
of
Malcolm III
The
Bruces
The Stewarts
- http://www.royal.gov.uk/HistoryoftheMonarchy/Scottish Monarchs(400ad-1603)/TheStewarts/TheStewarts.aspx The Stewarts Robert
II
(r.1371-1390)
Robert
III
(r.
1390-1406)
James
I (r.
1406-1437)
James
II
(r.
1437-1460)
James
III (r.
1460-1488)
James
IV
(r.1488-1513)
James
V
(r.1513-1542)
Mary,
Queen
of
Scots
(r.1542-1567)
James VI and I (r.
1567-1625)
Charles
II
(r.
1660-1685)
James
VII
and
II
(r.1685-1689)
William
II
and
III
(r.
1689-1702)
and
Mary
II (r.1689-1694)
Anne
(r.1702-1714)
|
THE FALSE "WHITE" ROYALS:
BY ANTONIO MARK MCCOY SR. - 2013 ALL OF THE "WHITE EUROPEAN" AND THE "WHITE ASIAN" ROYALS ARE NOTHING BUT !PHONIES. AND THE SOLE BASIS OF THEIR ROYALTY IS !FALSE ALSO. AND ALL OF THEIR ROYAL FAMILIES WERE CREATED VIA "THEFT". BECAUSE THE CREATORS OR THE ORIGINATORS OF THEIR ROYAL HOUSES ALL STARTED IN GREEK, ROMAN, AND IN MEDIEVAL TIMES. WITH THEIR THIEVING ANCESTORS WHO RAPED AND PILLAGED. THEN STOLE THE TAXES OF THEIR OWN PEOPLES. AND OF OTHER PEOPLES. THEN CONTROLLED THEM THROUGH FEAR, INTIMIDATION, AND THROUGH TAXES. JUST LIKE TODAY. CALLING THEMSELVES THE "KINGS" AND THE "QUEENS" OF THOSE TIMES. THEY OF WHO HAVE
NO REAL BASIS OF TRUE ROYALTY. TRUE
ROYALTY IS
"AFRICAN ROYALTY" ONLY. !EGYPTIAN, ISRAELI (HEBREW) , AND SHEBAN
ROYALTY ONLY. IT
WHICH HAD BEGUN VIA THE ORIGINAL HEBREW KINGS AND
QUEENS WHO WERE THE ONLY TRUE ROYALS THEN. AND THEIR EGYPTIAN AND
ETHIOPIAN COUNTERPARTS. AND THEIR SHEBAN COUNTERPARTS. AND THE WHITE EUROPEAN AND ASIAN
ROYALS CAME MUCH MUCH LATER AFTER THAT. BEGINNING WITH THE PAGAN GREEK,
ROMANS,
AND OTHERS LIKE THEM. !THEY OF WHOM ATTEMPTED TO MIMIC THE ORIGINAL
AFRICAN ROYALTY THERE-AFTER. !THEY OF WHICH ARE
ALL "SELFISH" AND "FALSE" ROYALS.
AND ONLY TRUE ROYALS "LOOK-AFTER" AND CARE FOR THEIR PEOPLES !FIRST. BEFORE THEY DO THEMSELVES. TRUE ROYALS WHO !WON'T ALLOW THEIR PEOPLES TO "GO-HUNGRY". AND TO STARVE IN THE STREETS. TRUE ROYALS WHO'LL ENSURE THAT EVERYONE WITHIN THEIR COUNTRY HAS A JOB. AND HAS HEALTH CARE. AND WELL BEING. AND DECENT HOMES TO LIVE IN. AND DECENT FOOD TO EAT. AND ALL OF THE ROYALS TODAY. ARE EITHER "HIDDEN". OR APPEARING TO BE MONARCHS WITH NO REAL POWER. THEY OF WHO THEN "ALLOW" THE LIKES OF THE PRESIDENTS AND THE PRIME MINISTER TO APPEAR TO BE RUNNING THEIR COUNTRIES. JUST SO THEY THE ROYALS "CAN'T" BURDEN THE SOLE BLAME WHEN THINGS AREN'T RUNNING RIGHT WITHIN THEIR COUNTRIES. THESE !FALSE "WHITE" EUROPEAN AND ASIAN ROYALS. WHO HAVE EVEN ATTEMPTED TO ASSOCIATE THE ORIGINS OF THEIR !FALSE ROYALTY. WITH "BLACK" EGYPTIAN AND "BLACK" SHEBAN ROYALTY. AND ALSO WITH "BLACK" ISRAELITE (HEBREW) ROYALTY. IN ORDER TO JUSTIFY THEIR OWN !FALSE ROYALTY THAT WAY. AND !THAT BEING THE SOLE REASON WHY THEY HAVE ALSO ATTEMPTED TO "FALSIFY" AND TO "STEAL-AWAY" "BLACK" EGYPTIAN, "BLACK" SHEBAN, AND "BLACK" ISRAELI (HEBREW) HISTORY FOR THEMSELVES. THEY OF WHO HAVE ATTEMPTED TO "WHITE-WASH" THE IMAGES AND THE HISTORY OF OUR "BLACK" EGYPTIAN, SHEBAN, AND ISRAELI ROYAL ANCESTRY. THEIR "WHITE" ROYALTY WHICH IS !FALSE. AND HAS NO CLAIM TO THE ORIGINAL ROYALTY OF THE EARTH. !THAT WHICH IS THE EGYPTIAN, THE SHEBAN, AND THE ISRAELI (HEBREW) ROYALTY. |
EGYPTIAN PRE-DYNASTIC PERIOD/CIVILIZATION 4800 - 3150 B.C. Badarian Culture Amratian Culture Gerzean A Culture Gerzean B Culture - NARMER (MENES/SCORPION KING/SCORPION II) 3300-3150 B.C. (HE OF WHOM HAD UNITED LOWER EGYPT AND CUSH/UPPER EGYPT INTO THE FIRST UNIFIED EARLY DYNASTIES) - THE 1ST DYNASTY Hor-Aha (son of Narmer) Neithotep (Hor-Aha's wife) Djer (son of Hor-Aha and Neithotep) Djet (Wadji) (son of Djer) Mereneith (wife of Djet) Den (son of Djet and Mereneith) Anedjib (son of Den) Semerkhet (son of Anebjib) Qaa - THE 2ND DYNASTY Hotepsekhemwy Raneb Nynetjer Seth-Peribsen Khasekhem Khasekhemwy (father of Djoser) - THE 3RD DYNASTY Sanakhte (Zanakhte) (brother of Djoser) Djoser Sekhemkhet Khaba Huni - THE 4TH DYNASTY Snefru (Prince Rahotep was a son) Khufu (Cheops) (also a son of Snefru) Djedefre (Redjedef) (son of Khufu) Khafre (Chephren) (son of Khufu) Menkaure (Mycerinus) Shepseskaf - THE 5TH DYNASTY Userkaf (great grandson of Khufu) Sahure Neferirkare Kakai Shepseskare Isi Neferefre Nyuserre Menkauhor Akauhor Djedkare Isesi Unas & Metjetji - THE 6TH DYNASTY Teti Userkare Meryre Phiops I (Pepi I) Merenre Antyemsaf Neferkare Phiops II (Pepi II) - THE 7TH & 8TH DYNASTIES Netrikare Menkare Neferkare II Neferkare III Djedkare II Neferkare IV Merenhor Menkamin I Nikare Neferkare V Neferkahor Neferkare VI Neferkamin II Ibi I Neferkaure Neferkauhor Neferirkare II - THE 9TH & 10TH DYNASTIES Meryibre Khety Merykare Kaneferre Nebkaure Akhtoy - THE 11TH DYNASTY Mentuhotep (Mentuhotpe) I Intef (Inyotef) I Intef (Inyotef) II Intef (Inyotef) III Mentuhotep (Mentuhotpe) II - 2061 B.C. - 2010 B.C. (Joseph's Pharaoh) Mentuhotep (Mentuhotpe) III Mentuhotep (Mentuhotpe) IV - THE 12TH DYNASTY Amenemhet I Senusret I Amenemhet II Senusret II Senusret III Amenemhet III Amenemhet IV Queen Sobeknefru - THE 13TH DYNASTY Wegaf Khutawyre Amenemhet V Hor Auyibre Sobekhotep II (Amenmehet VI) Khendjer Userkare Sobekhotep III Neferhotep I Khasekhemwyre Sobekhotep IV Khaneferre Ay Merneferre Neferhotep II Sekhemre Sankhtawy - THERE WAS MANY OTHER
"IDENTIFIED" AND
"UN-IDENTIFIED" PHARAOHS OF THIS TIME. IN "THIS" THE WEAKER 13TH DYNASTY. THE 13TH DYNASTY WAS MUCH WEAKER
THAN THE PREVIOUS 12TH DYNASTY
WAS. BECAUSE IT'S KEY RULERS WERE UNABLE TO HOLD ONTO THE "2" DIFFERENT
LANDS OF EGYPT (THE UPPER AND LOWER KINGDOMS) THEN. EITHER AT THE START
OF THE DYNASTY, OR TOWARD THE MIDDLE OF IT? !THAT OF WHICH HAD ALLOWED
A KEY RULING FAMILY TO "BREAK-AWAY" FROM THE CENTRAL AUTHORITY. AND TO
THEN-AFTER FORM THE EGYPTIAN CANAANITE 14TH DYNASTY. IN 1650
B.C. AT THE EXACT SAME
TIME. A SINGLE PHARAOH NEHESY
(AASEHRE). HAD TAKEN-OVER OTHER LANDS IN THE LOWER KINGDOM.
BEGINING THE LOWER KINGDOM'S 14TH DYNASTY THEN. THE EXACT SAME
"POWER VACUUM" IN EGYPT WHICH HAD RESULTED IN THE COLLAPSE OF THE 13TH DYNASTY "ALTOGETHER".
!THAT OF WHICH HAD ALLOWED THE UPPER KINGDOM "NEW" 16TH DYNASTY TO DECLARE ITS
INDEPENDENCE IN THEBES. THE UPPER KINGDOM DYNASTIES THAT WENT FROM THE "13TH DYNASTY" TO THEIR "16TH DYNASTY" THEN. WITH "2"
LOWER KINGDOM 14TH DYNASTY'S THEN, AT THE EXACT SAME TIME. !BOTH OF
WHICH WERE "CONQURED" OR "ASSUMULATED" LATER IN 1593
B.C. BY THE "HYKSOS".
-- THE EGYPTIAN CANAANITE 14TH DYNASTY Khakherewre 1650 B.C. - Nebefawre Sehebre Merdjefare Sewadjkare III Nebdjefare Webenre Awibre II Heribre Nebsenre Sekheperenre Djedkherewre Sankhibre II Kakemure Neferibre Khakare Akare Anati Djedkare Apophis I THE EGYPTIAN LOWER KINGDOM 14TH DYNASTY NEHESY (AASEHRE) 1650 B.C. - 1593 B.C. (Pharaoh of Exodus) - THE
EGYPTIAN LOWER KINGDOM 15TH
DYNASTY
-"THE HYSKOS RULERS" SALITIS - 1593 B.C. - SAKIR-HAR KHYAN APOPHIS - 1580 - 1540 B.C. KHAMUDI - 1540 - 1530 B.C. - NOTE THAT THIS WAS THE "HYKSOS" (INVADERS OF THE LOWER KINGDOM) DYNASTY. AT THE TIME THE UPPER KINGDOM THEBAN'S WERE IN THEIR 16TH DYNASTY (SHOWN BELOW). THE UPPER KINGDOM THEBAN 16TH DYNASTY THAT LASTED FOR THE PERIOD OF THE LOWER KINGDOM 14TH AND 15TH DYNASTIES DID. BECAUSE THE LOWER KINGDOM 14TH DYNASTY ONLY LASTED A TOTAL OF 57 YEARS TIME. IT BEING THAT SHORT BECAUSE THE ONLY LOWER KINGDOM PHARAOH THEN WAS NEHESY (AASEHRE). !HE OF WHO WAS THE PHARAOH OF THE "HEBREW EXODUS". AND !HE OF WHO WAS THE PHARAOH THAT OPPOSED "MOSES". NEHESY'S ARMY THAT WAS "DESTROY" BY "GOD" AT THE RED SEA. LEAVING HIM "DEFENSELESS" AGAINST THE INVADING HYKSOS THAT CAME LATER. THE "HYKSOS" THAT WERE FROM; "SYRIA", "CANAAN", AND "BABYLON". MANY OF THE "HYKSOS" WHOM WERE; "SUM-ARYAN'S", "BABYLONIAN'S", "CANAANITES", "AMORITES", AND "AMALEKITES". !THEM BEING A MIXED-ORIGIN AND A MIXED-RACE OF PEOPLES FROM "RETJENU" (AS STATED BY "PHARAOH KAMOS" IN HIS WRITINGS). IN 1593 B.C. THE YEAR OF THE HYKSOS TAKE-OVER OF THE LOWER KINGDOM. MANY YEARS PRIOR TO THAT. THE UPPER KINGDOM THEBAN'S ENTERED THEIR 16TH DYNASTY IN 1649 B.C. AT THE TIME THE LOWER KINGDOM 14TH DYNASTY ABOVE. AT A TIME OBVIOUSLY. WHEN THERE WERE SEPARATE UPPER AND LOWER KINGDOM PHARAOHS. AT A TIME A LOT OF DIFFERENT PHARAOHS HAD RULED. MANY OF WHICH ARE "UN-NAMED" OR "UN-IDENTIFIED" TODAY. AND THEREFORE THE 13TH DYNASTY TO THE 14TH DYNASTY ARE RATHER VAGUE TODAY. BECAUSE IT BEING THE PERIOD OF THE "BREAK-AWAY" OF UPPER AND LOWER KINGDOMS THEN. WITH MANY UPPER AND LOWER KINGDOM PHARAOH'S THAT WERE "UN-IDENTIFED". AND THEREFORE "UN-NAMED" TODAY BECAUSE OF SUCH. THE EGYPTIAN UPPER KINGDOM 16TH DYNASTY DJEHUTI - 1649 B.C. SOBEKHOTEP VIII - 1645 B.C. NEFERHOTEP III - 1629 B.C. MENTUHOTEPI - 1628 B.C. (YEAR OF HEBREW EXODUS) NEBIRYRAW I - 1627 B.C. (HEBREWS "WANDER" IN UPPER EGYPT AND THE "WILDERNESS") NEBIRIAU II - 1601 B.C. (HEBREWS "WANDER" IN UPPER EGYPT AND THE "WILDERNESS") BERI-ANKH - 1600 B.C. (HEBREWS "WANDER" IN UPPER EGYPT AND THE "WILDERNESS") SHEDWAST - 1588 B.C. (YEAR HEBREWS ENTER ISRAEL) DEDUMOSE I DEDUMOSE II MONTEMSAF MENTUHOTEP VI SENUSRET IV - THE EGYPTIAN LOWER KINGDOM 16TH DYNASTY "THE HYSKOS RULERS" ANATHER USERANAT/APERANAT SEMQEN BEBI-ANKH SEUSERENRE PEPI III SNEFERANKH-RE NEBMAATRE NIKARE MERIBRE NUBANKHRE AHOTEPRE ANETJERRE KHA-USERRE SAKET WADJET QAR YAKBAAM - THE EGYPTIAN UPPER KINGDOM 17TH DYNASTY SEKHEMRE-WAHKHAW-RAHOTEP - 1580 B.C. SOBEKEMSAF I SOBEKEMSAF II NUBKHEPERRE INTEF SENAKHTENRE (TAO I) SEQENERE (TAO II) - 1560 B.C. (HE OF WHOM HAD BEGAN WAR AGAINST THE HYKSOS IN LOWER EGYPT) KAMOSE - 1555 B.C. (HE OF WHOM HAD "FURTHERED" WAR AGAINST THE HYKSOS IN LOWER EGYPT) - THE EGYPTIAN LOWER KINGDOM 17TH DYNASTY "THE HYSKOS RULERS" WHO IN THE !FUCK CARES WHO THEY WERE? I DON'T. THEM BEING DRIVEN COMPLETELY OUT "ALL" OF EGYPT BY THEN. - THE EGYPTIAN UPPER KINGDOM 18TH DYNASTY AHMOSE - 1549/50 - 1524/25 B.C. (HE OF WHOM HAD DROVE THE HYKSOS COMPLETELY OUT "ALL" OF EGYPT) AMENHOTEP I - 1524/25 - 1503 B.C. THUTMOSE I - 1502 - 1493 B.C. THUTMOSE II - 1493 - 1479 B.C. HATSHEPSUT - 1479 - 1458 B.C. THUTMOSE III - 1479 - 1424 B.C. (HE OF WHOM HAD CONQUERED WESTERN AND SOUTHERN ISRAEL) AMENHOTEP II - 1424 - 1398 B.C. THUTMOSE IV - 1398 - 1388 B.C. AMENHOTEP III -1388 - 1350 B.C. AKHENATEN - 1351 - 1334 B.C. SMENKHKARE - 1335 - 1334 B.C. NEFERNEFENUATEN - 1334 - 1332 B.C. TUT - 1332 - 1323 B.C. AY - 1323 - 1319 B.C. HOREMHEB - 1319 - 1292 B.C. - THE EGYPTIAN UPPER KINGDOM 19TH DYNASTY RAMESSES I - 1292 - 1290 B.C. SETI I - 1290 - 1279 B.C. (HE OF WHOM HAD RULED WESTERN ISRAEL ALSO) RAMESSES II - 1279 - 1213 B.C. (HE OF WHOM HAD RULED WESTERN ISRAEL ALSO) MERNEPTAH - 1213 - 1203 B.C. (HE OF WHOM HAD WENT TO WAR AGAINST ISRAEL, AND HAD DEFEATED THEM) SETI II - 1203 - 1197 B.C. AMENMESSE - 1201 - 1198 B.C. SIPTAH - 1197 - 1191 B.C. TWOSRET - 1191 - 1189 B.C. - THE EGYPTIAN UPPER KINGDOM 20TH DYNASTY SETNAKHTE - 1189 - 1186 B.C. RAMESSES III - 1186 - 1155 B.C. (HE OF WHOM HAD WENT TO WAR AGAINST THE SEA PEOPLE, AND HAD DEFEATED THEM) RAMESSES IV - 1155 - 1149 BC RAMESSES V - 1149 - 1145 BC RAMESSES VI - 1145 - 1137 B.C. RAMESSES VII - 1137 - 1130 B.C. RAMESSES VIII - 1130 - 1129 B.C. RAMESSES IX - 1129 - 1111 B.C. RAMESSES X - 1111 - 1107 B.C. RAMESSES XI - 1107 - 1077 B.C. |
BLACK
CLEOPATRA
VII: - "THE TRUE BLACK CLEOPATRA VII" (69-30 B.C.) !FALSE "WHITE-WASHED" PIECE OF !CRAP - HERE
BEING THE "ORIGINAL" RELIEFS (UPPER LEFT) OF THE FAMOUS "CLEOPATRA
VII". AND !NOT ALL OF THOSE "WHITE-WASHED" VERSIONS YOU'VE SEE (ALIKE
THE !FALSE BIG NOSED WHITE EUROPEAN GERMAN VERSION ONE ON THE RIGHT).
THE "ORIGINAL !BLACK CLEOPATRA" (SHOWN IN THESE 2 ORIGINAL RELIEFS
ABOVE). THAT !OF COURSE "PREDATES" THE !FALSE ONE ON THE RIGHT. IN ALL
THE "OBVIOUSNESS". BECAUSE THE !FALSE ONE THAT IS A "WHITE-WASH". THAT
WAS CREATED LATER IN ORDER TO "DISCREDIT" THE "TRUE BLACK CLEOPATRA
VII".
THE "TRUE BLACK CLEOPATRA VII" BEING SHOWN WEARING A "TURKEY HEADDRESS". !OK. A "TURKEY HEADDRESS"? THE "WILD TURKEY" THAT WAS !FIRST "KNOWN" OF FROM "ANCIENT MEXICO" (AROUND "2,000 B.C.). !SO. I ASK. !WHY WAS CLEOPATRA VII WEARING A "TURKEY HEADDRESS" IN HER TIME? !IF (ACCORDING TO "WHITE HISTORIANS) THE ANCIENT EGYPTIAN'S "DID !NOT" GET TO THE "AMERICA'S" BACK !THEN (BEFORE "COLOMBUS"). EXPLAIN !THAT TO ME WILL YOU? !OK. THE "ANCIENT !BLACK EGYPTIAN'S". THAT !DID !INDEED VISIT THE "AMERICA'S" WAY BACK !THEN. !BECAUSE. !THEY HAD THEIR COUSINS IN THE "AMERICA'S" THEN (AS I HAD "PROVEN" BEFORE). AS "PROVEN" VIA THE "D.N.A." !OK. AND THE "TRUE BLACK CLEOPATRA VII" RELIEFS "PROVE" EXACTLY !THAT AS WELL. AS WELL AS HER BEING "BLACK". !YOU LYING ASS WHITE PIECES OF !CRAP. |
http://atlantablackstar.com/2014/11/21/7-lies-told-to-make-egypt-white/2/
- 7 Lies Told to Make Egypt White - Ancient Egyptians, how egypt became white, lies about ancient egypt, Lies to make Egypt White, white Egyptians - Art and Sculptures Prove Ancient Egyptians Were Not Black - Manu Ampim, a professor at Merritt College specializing in African and African-American history and culture, claims in the book “Modern Fraud: The Forged Ancient Egyptian Statues of Ra-Hotep and Nofret” that many ancient Egyptian statues and artworks are modern frauds that have been created specifically to hide the “fact” that the ancient Egyptians were Black, while authentic artworks that demonstrate Black characteristics are systematically defaced or even “modified.” http://www.raceandhistory.com/manu/update.htm - THE VANISHING EVIDENCE OF CLASSICAL AFRICAN CIVILIZATIONS: - METHODS OF DESTRUCTION AND ALTERATION - My observations of the evidence are careful and are supported by photographic and video documentation. The extensive study of over a million artifacts and images gave me the keen power of observation to make analyses of the same materials that are also available to Egyptologists, although most of them have not studied the volume of the materials that I have examined. When the artifacts in question were examined meticulously, I found that the methods used to change or damage the images are varied, and they include: subtly altering the shape of the nose on statues by using some type of sanding device; adding on false noses; reshaping or completely destroying the face on temple and tomb walls; lightening the color of the face and body paint on statues and paintings; completely eliminating the paint on statues and paintings and thus making the images appear “white”; destroying the lower facial structure, particularly the chin and jaw area; putting in false bluish-gray inlaid eyes; plastering over temple images with White Portland Cement during ongoing “conservation” work; and creating outright forgeries! These acts of fraud and deliberate destruction is what I call the handiwork of modern conspirators. I was stunned by such an angry, vicious, and widespread attack against Black images by the enemies of Classical African Civilizations. - MODERN FORGERIES - One of the most absurd invention of the conspirators is the forged statues of Ra-Hotep and Nofret in the Cairo Museum. I present detailed and concrete evidence in my forthcoming book, Modern Fraud: The Forged Ancient Egyptian Statues of Ra-Hotep and Nofret (also see part 3 of this series on the Museum Evidence) that there is a list of specific artistic rules which are consistently applied to statue after statue throughout the pyramid age.[1] Although some writers would attempt to argue to the contrary, the fact that there was a body of specific artistic rules is demonstrated by the tens of thousands of statues and paintings that are presented in exactly the same way across various sites and cites throughout all of the major periods: the old, middle, and new kingdoms. Thus, these shocking forgeries make no artistic sense as they violate a long list of clearly defined rules, according to the ancient Egyptian rule system. Further, these fabricated European-looking statues do not make any cultural or historical sense, and it is consistent that they were found (or rather created by modern hands) during the 19th century, which has been called by some historians as “The Great Age of Fakes.” There is no doubt that the Ra-Hotep and Nofret forgeries stand completely outside of the ancient Egyptian artistic, cultural, and historical reality. |
THE EGYPTIANS WERE BLACK |
THE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS WERE NEVER WHITE |
THE WHITE PEOPLE EGYPTIAN LIES |
Deu
18:15 "The LORD your God will raise up for you a Prophet like me
from your midst, from your brethren. Him you shall hear, - - Deu 18:18 'I will raise up for them a Prophet like you from among their brethren, and will put My words in His mouth, and He shall speak to them all that I command Him. |
!FUNNY. I DON'T SEE ANY GOD DAMNED "WHITE" OR "ASIAN" PEOPLES HERE. THE ANCIENT AND ORIGINAL EGYPTIAN'S WERE A "BLACK PEOPLES". THAT'S WHY. IT BEING THAT GOD DAMN SIMPLE. AND NO ONE ELSE WERE THEY. AS SHOWN IN THESE ORIGINAL STATUES, RELIEFS, MURALS, AND PAINTINGS FROM THOSE TIMES. AND WHAT YOU DON'T SEE THEE. IS ANY "WHITE PEOPLES" AND/OR "ASIAN PEOPLES" IN THEM. DO YOU? BECAUSE THEY'RE WERE NO WHITE OR ASIAN EGYPTIAN'S IN THOSE TIMES. IT BEING THAT GOD DAMN SIMPLE. ISN'T IT? NOW THE ONLY PLACE YOU'LL SEE WHITE EGYPTIAN'S THAT ARE "ALLEGEDLY" FROM THOSE TIMES IS ON A PHONY-ASS "HALLMARK CARD". THAT BEING THE ONLY PLACE YOU'LL SEE IT. OTHER THAN ON THE INTERNET, ON "WHITE" WEBSITES. ALL THOSE BEING THE WHITE RACES !GREAT !GREAT FALLACY OF TRUTH. !ONCE AGAIN MIGHT ADD. THOSE ALLEGED WHITE EGYPTIANS ARE. BECAUSE THEY'RE WERE NONE. !WHITE PEOPLES WHO'LL DO "ANYTHING" TO BE SEEN AS !GREAT. AND TO BE SEEN AS THE SO-CALLED GREATEST RACE ON EARTH. AND ALL FOR THEIR "WHITE SUPREMACY !LIE/S". IT BEING NOTHING MORE THAN "THAT". A !LIE. AND A CONTINUED !LIE. !THEY OF WHOM WILL !NEVER QUIT THESE !LIES. WILL THEY? EVEN IF THE !LIE IS SO DAMN OBVIOUS AS THIS !LIE IS. GOD DAMN "WHITE PEOPLES" WERE "NOT" THE ANCIENT EGYPTIAN'S. |
In the course of giving a lesson from history and a warning for the future the Qur'an mentioned a great personality and a powerful nation in Sura 18. The great personality is called Zul-Qarnain, and the powerful nation is called Gog and Magog.
According to the above Qur'anic passage Zul-Qarnain built a huge structure from iron and lead to stop the multitudes of Gog and Magog from coming out to cause havoc and destruction to their nearest neighoubers.
This structure must have been gigantic in size, for was built between two mountains. It was very strong that the multitude of Gog and Magog were unable to dig through it or to climb it. Thus the numerous millions of Gog and Magog were locked behind this structure until God's appointed time before the Day of Resurrection as the following Qur'anic verse confirms:
So there is a time in the future where the millions of Gog and Magog will be let through the barrier that Zul-Qarnain built and they will cause a lot of destruction to the mankind.
Both Sahih Muslim and Bukhari mentioned Gog and Magog:
Narrated Zainab bint Jahsh:
That one day Allah's Apostle entered upon her in a state of fear and
said, "None has the right to be worshipped but Allah! Woe to the Arabs
from the Great evil that has approached (them). Today a hole has been
opened in the dam of Gog and Magog like this." The Prophet made a
circle with his index finger and thumb.
And the following:
This hadith has been narrated on the authority of Jabir with the same
chain of transmitters but with the addition that Gog and Magog would
walk until they would reach the mountain of al-Khamar and it is a
mountain of Bait-ul-Maqdis and they would say: We have killed those who
are upon the earth. Let us now kill those who are in the sky and they
would throw their arrows towards the sky and the arrows would return to
them besmeared with blood.
And the following Hadith was mentioned in the course of certain warnings about the Dajjal and the promise of the appearing of Jesus before the Last Hour:
We can see from the above Hadiths that the people of Gog and Magog do exist right now, that they will be let loose before the Resurrection Day and that the number of the army of Gog and Magog must be so extremely large that they drank all the water of the lake of Tiberias in one go. From all the above the barrier that Zul-Qarnain had built must be of gigantic proportions to keep these people to this day.
With so many references to that strong and huge barrier Muslim explorers began looking for it.
Ibn Kathir informs us in his commentary that:
Ibn Khurdabih (846 A.D.) gives the following account of Sallaam's expedition, who was sent to report on the Iron Gate by Khalif Wathiq.
After some time journeying, Sallaam came to a "lofty mountain on which was a fortress. And the rampart which Dhu'l-Qarnain built is in a broad opening between two mountains, the breadth of which is two hundred cubits [300ft or 100m]. That was the road through which they (Gog & Magog) issued and spread over the earth. And he dug the foundation of it to the depth of 30 cubits, and built it of iron and copper until it reached to the surface of the ground. Then he raised two side pillars near to the mountains on both sides of the opening 25 cubits broad, and 50 cubits high, which projected at the base to ten cubits beyond the gate. The while was built with iron bricks, covered with copper, each a cubit and a half by a cubit and a half, and four finger breadth high. There was an iron lintel 120 cubits long and 5 cubits broad, which rested on each end on the pillars, projecting 10 cubits beyond them. Above the lentel was a structure of iron covered with copper to the top of the mountains. The height of the structure extending as far as the eye could reach, about 60 cubits above the lentels. Above it were iron pinnacles, each having as the side, two horns bent towards each other. The length of each pinnacle was five cubits and the breadth four. There were 37 pinnacles upon the structure. Then the gate had two doors which lowered, each 50 cubits broad by 75 cubits high, and 5 cubits thick. The upright of the doors turned on pivots upon a level with the lintels, and no air could penetrate either by the gate, or from the mountains. The whole being built as in one piece. On the gate was a bolt 7 cubits long and a fathom round which two men could not draw. The height of the bolt from the ground was 25 cubits. Five cubits above the bolt was a lock longer than the bolt, the two staples of which were each 2 cubits long. To the lock a key was hung a cubit and a half long with 12 wards, each ward like the pestle of a mortar. The key was 4 spans round and was suspended from a chain 8 cubits long and 4 spans round which was riveted to the gate. The ring to which the chain was attached was like the ring of a ballista. The threshold of the gate was 10 cubits broad, with a length of 100 cubits, excluding the space under the two pillars, the visible part of which was 5 cubits. ... In one of the two fortresses, were the builders implements, with which the rampart had been built, consisting of iron cauldrons, and iron ladles. On each trivet, 4 cauldrons like those in which soap is boiled (could be placed).
There was also the remainder of the iron bricks which were sticking together with rust.
Sallaam says: "I said to those of the fortress which were present, 'Has anything at all of this rampart been damaged?' They answered 'Nothing except this crack.' Now the crack was in breadth as thin as a thread. I said 'Do you put anything in it?' They replied 'No! For the thickness of the rampart is 5 cubits which are equal each to one and a half Iraqian cubits'. Sallaam said: "So I approached, and taking my knife out of my boot, I scraped in the fissure and got out as much as half a drachm, and tied it up in a cloth to show it to Al-Wathiq bi-'llah. At the top of the right door of the rampart was written in iron characters in the ancient language "But when the promise of my Lord shall come to pass, He shall turn it to dust and the promise of my Lord is true".8 So
the
Lord
scattered them from there over all the earth, and they stopped building
the city. 9 That is why it was called Babel—because
there the Lord
confused the language of the whole world. From there the Lord
scattered them over the face of the whole earth.
NOW MY TAKE ON "EXACTLY" WHY THE "GODS" OR
"GOD" HAD "DESTROYED" THE TOWER OF BABEL? AND THEN-AFTER "SCATTERED"
THE "BABYLONIAN PEOPLES"? AND HAD THEN-AFTER. "SCRAMBLED" THEIR
LANGUAGES? IS SIMPLY BECAUSE NIMROD. UNDER THE DIRECTION OF HIS
WORSHIPED ANUNNAKI GOD "MARDUK". THE ANUNNAKI GOD "MARDUK" OF WHO WAS
NOT THE LEADER OF THE PLANET NIBIRU THEN, AND THE NIBURAN'S. AND THE
CHIEF ANUNNAKI GOD "ANU" WAS. "ANU" WHO IS OUR "GOD" TODAY. HE OF WHOM
DIDN'T WANT THE DESCENDANT'S OF NOAH TO BECOME LEADERS OF THEMSELVES.
!WITHOUT GODLY WORSHIP. AND NIMROD REPRESENTED !THAT. AND THE "TOWER OF
BABEL" WAS NOT REALLY A PHYSICAL TOWER TO THE HEAVENS. IT INSTEAD BEING
A "D.N.A." UPGRADE THAT NIMROD WAS "ATTEMPTING", UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF
HIS WORSHIPED GOD "MARDUK". THE ANUNNAKI GOD MARDUK WHO'S THE SON OF
THE ANUNNAKI GOD "ENKI". AND THE ANUNNAKI GOD "ENKI" WHO'S NONE OTHER
THAT THE GOD "SATAN" HIMSELF. THE ANUNNAKI GOD "SATAN" OR "ENKI", WHO'S
THE BROTHER OF THE ANUNNAKI GOD "ANU". ANU WHO DID NOT WANT EARTHLY
MANKIND TO "BE AS" THEM THE GODS. WHILST SATAN/ENKI DID WANT THEM TO
BE. AND !THAT "NOT" BEING THE FIRST TIME THE ANUNNAKI GOD "ENKI" OR
"SATAN". HAD "ATTEMPTED" TO "ELEVATE" EARTHLY MANKIND UP INTO A
"GOD-LIKE" POSITION. VIA THEIR "D.N.A." THE FIRST TIME BEING WITH "EVE"
IN THE GARDEN OF EDEN. !AH. SATAN OF WHOM HAD "ATTEMPTED" THEN TO
ELEVATE HER AND "ADAM" VIA THEIR "D.N.A." THAT "D.N.A." WHICH WAS
IDENTIFIED AS THE "TREE OF LIFE" THEN. !AH. NOW WHO KNEW ALL OF THIS?
!EXCEPT ME? !YOU OF WHO HAVE "NEVER" "EVER" "EVER" HEARD IT UNTIL !NOW.
AND IF YOU SAY YOU HAVE. THEN YOU ARE SIMPLY A !LIAR. !LIAR OR NOT?
HERE BEING THE !TRUTH. AND "ANU" OR "GOD" WANTED TO "KEEP" US ALL
"BLIND" AND "DUMB" TO THE TRUE NATURE OF THEM, OUR "ALIEN GODS". THEM
ALSO KEEPING US "HELPLESS" AS WELL. SOMETHING NIMROD WAS WELL AWARE OF
IN HIS DAY OF COURSE. !HE OF WHOM HIS HAD FIRST "CONQUESTED", THEN
"UNIFIED" HIS PEOPLES IN BABYLON. THEN HAVING THEM WORKING IN "UNITY"
THEN. IN ORDER TO "ELEVATE" EARTHLY MANKIND INTO "GOD-HOOD". AND !THIS
IS THE TRUTH. THAT OUR "GOD" OR "ANU" WANTS US TO REMAIN "BLIND" AND
"DUMB". AND RELIANT UPON HIM. SO "HE" HIMSELF CAN BE SEEN AS "GREAT" TO
US. ETC... ETC... !YES. WHICH IS ALSO "EXACTLY" WHY "RELIGION" WAS
CREATED LATER. "RELIGION" WHICH IS MERELY A "BRAINWASH" OF THE GODS.
|
INFORMATION
TAKEN
FROM
MY: Ancient History of Mankind on Earth Part II E-Book: By Antonio Mark McCoy Sr.© Copyright 2004, Antonio Mark McCoy Sr. Today we have 6,000 languages. Which all originated from 11 or so protolanguages below. Of course those 11 or so protolanguages originated from one language. The language that was spoken by all peoples, before the Tower of Babel incident.
|
INFORMATION TAKEN FROM MY;
Ancient history of Mankind
on Earth E-Book:
By Antonio Mark McCoy Sr. © Copyright 2003, Antonio Mark McCoy Sr. The White Hittites suddenly conquered Black Babylon, the fall of Babylon. The end of Black Egypt's 14th Dynasty, due to immigration and conquest by Asian and Mongolian Hyksos. The fall of the Black Minoan Greek Civilization, after they were invaded by the White Mycenaean invaders. The White and Mongolian's Aryans invade and conquest the Black Indus Civilization in India. The Mongolian Shang Dynasty suddenly defeats the Black Xian Dynasty in China. This is exactly what I meant when I had said how Blacks started Civilization, while Whites later took-over them. Then claiming that they started them. Despite all the historical evidence that they clearly "DID NOT". As if were so stupid that we cannot see the facts? |
Gomer He was the father of the Cimmerians who settled originally on the shores of the Caspian Sea. Ezekiel places the descendants of Gomer in a place later known as Galatia. Josephus recorded that the Galatians, also known as Gauls were formerly known as Gomerites.
Ashchenaz His descendants settled originally in what is now Armenia. But after Shemitic and Hamitic Tribes were there first. In later Jewish traditions he was associated with his father Gomer with the Germanic races. Hence, Germanic Jews are still known as the Ashkenazi. Jeremiah confirms the identity of the Ashchenazim with the Askuza. This name, the Askuza of the Assyrian records, later became the Skythai or the Scythian's.
Riphath His descendants gave their name to the Riphaean mountains, which early cosmographers thought of as constituting the then northern boundary of the world.
Togarmah His earliest descendants settled in Armenia. Armenians claim to be descended from Togarmah and Ashkenaz. Turkey is commonly thought to be a derivative of Togarmah and is supported by the fact that Armenia extended into Turkey. It should also be noted that the Hebrew word for Germany is Ashkenaz.
Magog His immediate descendants being known as the Magogites, Josephus tells us that they were later known to the Greeks as the Scythian's.
Madai His descendants became the Madaeans, who are better known to us as the Medes.
Javan The name of Javan's descendants appears in Assyrian documents as the Iamanu. They engaged the Assyrians in a major naval battle during the reign of Sargon II. The Archaemenian inscriptions also refer to them as the Yauna. Homer wrote in the Iliad that Iawones (Hebrew Iawan) was the father of the Ionians (Greek Iones).
EIishah He was the ancestor of the Aeolians, and his name constantly appears in Greek history.
Tarshish The father of the peoples of Tarshish or Tartesis, whose descendants are thought by most to have settled in Spain.
Kittim Referred to in the old Phoenician inscriptions as the 'kt' or 'kty,' a people who settled on the island of Cyprus.
Dodanim This is the collective name of the people descended from Dodan, who were known to the Greeks as the Donlani, the Dardanians of Asia Minor. They settled initially around the area of Troy, whose coastal regions are known to this day as the Dardanelles.
Tubal The descendants of Tubal was adjacent to that of Tegarama (Togarmah). Josephus recorded the name of Tubal's descendants as the Thobelites, who later became the Iberes. Their land, in Josephus' day, was known to the Romans as Iberia, and covered what is today the state of old Soviet Georgia.
Meshech The descendants of Mesheeh are often spoken of in close association with those of Tubal.
Tiras Their name was also known as the Tursha, as referring to them as invaders from the north. The Greeks were later to know them as the Tyrsenoi, whom they feared as marauding pirates. Josephus identifies them as the tribe who were known to the Romans as Thirasians, but to the Greeks as Thracians or Thrace. History attests that they were indeed a most savage race. They are also described as a 'ruddy and blue-eyed people. Who were the first Tribes of Yugoslavia and the surrounding area. But made it to Italy.
SUMER AND THE SUMERIAN'S/SUM-ARYAN'S:
BY ANTONIO MARK MCCOY SR. - 2013 THE
"RISE"
OF "SUMER"
BEGAN SOON AFTER THE "FALL" OF NIMROD'S "BABYLON". IN FACT. "SUMER"
WOULD OF HAD "NEVER" RISEN. IF IT WASN'T FOR THE "FALL" OF NIMROD'S
BABYLON PRIOR. NIMROD'S BABYLON THAT CAME AFTER THE GREAT FLOOD OF HIS
GRANDFATHER "NOAH". BUT BEFORE THAT OF "SUMER" THOUGH. NIMROD'S BABYLON
THAT WAS MOSTLY MADE-UP OF HAMITE (IN THE FORM OF HIS INVADING
CUSHITES) AND SHEMITE (THE INVADED PEOPLES THERE) PEOPLES. THE
"CUSHITE'S" OF "NIMRODS" KINGDOM OF BABYLON. AND THE "SHEMITES" OF
BABYLON. WHO WERE UNDER NIMROD'S BABYLONIAN RULE THEN OF COURSE. WERE
"ALL"
LATER "SCATTERED" AROUND THE WORLD. TO THE "FOUR CORNERS OF THE EARTH"
THEN.
INCLUDING TO "AMEXUM" (NORTH AMERICA) AFTER THE "DESTRUCTION" OF THE
"TOWER OF "BABYLON" IN 4,288 B.C. BY "GOD" OR BY THE "GODS". AND !THAT
WHICH HAD LEFT THE REGION OF BABYLON. "WIDE-OPEN" FOR CONQUEST
THERE-AFTER. AS THE "JAPHETHIAN" TRIBES ("INDO
SCYTHIAN'S") FROM THE NORTH TOOK IT
OVER THEN-AFTER.
!THEY OF WHOM COULD OF HAD "NEVER" CONQUEST NIMROD'S BABYLON PRIOR. BECAUSE THE CUSHITE ARMIES OF NIMROD WERE "TOO POWERFUL" FOR THE SCYTHIAN'S THEN. AND NOT EVEN THE "SCYTHIAN'S" WANTED TO FACE THEM THEN. THE LATER CONQUESTING "SCYTHIAN'S" OF WHOM. BECAME THE "SUMERIAN'S" AND THE "SUM-ARYANS". AFTER THEY THEMSELVES WERE GENETICALLY MANIPULATED BY "ALIEN ARYAN'S (LYRAN RENEGADES)". AND THAT BEING HOW THEY LATER TOOK ON THE NAME THE "SUM-ARYAN'S". THE NAME "SUM-ARYAN'S" MEANING THE "ARYAN'S OF THE LAND OF SUMER". THE LAND OF "SUMER" BEING WHERE THE HUMAN-REPTILIAN "BLUE-BLOODS" ORIGINATED FROM. AS PER THE FOLLOWING STORY BELOW. NOW BEFORE YOU CONTINUE AND READ IT. KNOW THAT IT'S "ALL" TRUE. AND IS NOT A HOAX OR A FAIRYTALE. I MYSELF WHO HAD SENT THE WRITER A SMALL CORRECTION OF VERBIAGE (the genetics of blonde-haired, blue-eyed people whose mind-patterns and genetics are so easily controlled) YEARS AGO. I OF WHOM HAD SENT THAT "CORRECTION" TO HIM YEARS AGO. BECAUSE HIM PRIOR BELIEVING THE "MYTH" OF THE ALLEGED !SUPERIOR BLOND-HAIRED, BLUE-EYED WHITE ARYAN-TYPE PEOPLES. !THAT OF WHICH HE USE TO HAVE ON HIS WEB SITE. !UNTIL I HAD "SET-HIM-STRAIGHT" ON THE !FACTS OF HUMAN GENETICS. ME THEN INFORMING HIM OF HOW SUCH PEOPLES HAVE "GENETIC DEFICIENCIES". AND !NOT "GENETIC ABILITIES". AND AFTER HE SAW MY GENETIC !FACTS. HE CHANGED THE ABOVE VERBIAGE TO WHAT IT IS NOW. AND I MIGHT ADD. !WITHOUT "EVER" GIVING ME A GOD !DAMN BIT OF CREDIT FOR IT. !OF COURSE HE DIDN'T. BECAUSE I'M A "BLACK MAN" WHO HAD "SCHOOLED" HIM ON "WHITE HUMAN GENETICS". !HE OF WHOM USE TO BELIEVE THE SAME "BULL SHIT" THAT ADOLPH HITLER ONCE BELIEVED. THAT BLUE-EYED BLOND-HAIRED PEOPLES WERE SOME SORT OF GOD DAMN SUPER PEOPLES. !BLAB !BLAB !BLAB. WHEN IN REALITY. THEY ARE "NOT" IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM. AND ARE INSTEAD A "DEFICIENT PEOPLES". - NOW ALLOW ME TO EXPLAIN SOMETHING TO YOU HERE. THE NIMROD BABYLONIAN'S, AND THE LATER SUMERIAN'S. OFTEN GET "INTEGRATED" BY HISTORICAL RESEARCHERS. MANY ALLEGED HISTORICAL RESEARCHERS WHO "FAIL" TO SEE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE 2 CULTURES. BOTH CULTURES THAT HAD STARTED IN THE EXACT SAME REGION. AND THAT REGION BEING "BABYLON" (WHICH IS IRAN AND IRAQ TODAY). SOME BLACK HISTORICAL RESEARCHERS WHO BELIEVE THAT THE ORIGINAL AND FIRST "SUMERIANS" WERE OF THE "BLACK" RACE. !BECAUSE THEY OF WHOM ARE "CONFUSED" BETWEEN THE TWO CULTURES. THAT'S WHY. !THEY OF WHOM ARE REFERRING TO THE PREVIOUS NIMROD BABYLON CULTURE AS BEING "BLACK". THINKING OF "THAT" TO HAVE BEEN "SUMER" THAT CAME LATER. OTHERS WHO SUGGEST HOW THE "SUMERIANS" HAD "SUDDENLY" APPEARED IN HISTORY. FROM VIRTUALLY "OUT OF NOWHERE". THEY TOO WHO ARE "CONFUSED". "CONFUSED" OF WHO THE EXACT PEOPLES WERE "BEFORE" THEY WERE CALLED THE "SUMERIAN'S". AND ALSO. ALL OF THESE "ALLEGED" HISTORICAL RESEARCHERS. !FAIL TO READ THE GOD DAMN "BIBLE". DON'T THEY? THE BIBLE THAT "CLEARLY" GIVES THE HINT TO WHAT HAD "ENDED" THE NIMROD RULED BABYLON. AND BEGAN SUMER THERE-AFTER. !DUH. IT'S ALL IN THE "BIBLE". !DUH.
NOW ALLOW ME TO ADD. THE "SUM-ARYAN'S" WHO ORIGINATED IN OLD BABYLON. WHO WERE THE "JAPHETHIAN TRIBES" ("INDO SCYTHIAN'S") FROM THE NORTH. THEY OF WHOM TOOK IT OVER THEN. AS I HAD SAID EARLIER. THE AREA WHICH WAS IRAQ AND IRAN IN THOSE TIMES. !THEY OF WHOM WERE THE ANCESTORS OF THE LATER "ARYAN'S" WHO MOVED EAST INTO ASIA THEN-AFTER. AND !THEM ALSO BEING THE ORIGIN OF THE "ARYAN'S" AND THE "INDO-ARYAN'S". THEN LATTER GROUPS OF "SUM-ARYAN'S" MOVED ELSEWHERE INTO NORTHERN AFRICA. ALL THE WAY TO "MALI". THERE BEING DIRECT DESCENDANTS OF THE ORIGINAL SUM-ARYAN'S IN MALI TODAY. WHO ARE MEMBERS OF THE FAMED "DOGON TRIBE", AND OF OTHER MALIAN TRIBES.
MALIAN TRIBES OF PEOPLES BEING BLACK AFRICAN SUMERIAN DESCENDANTS THEY CALL THEMSELVES. AND "NOT" "SUM-ARYAN'S". THE ORIGINAL "SUM-ARYAN'S" FROM OLD BABYLON. WHO'S GENERATIONS BECAME "DILUTED" VIA THE MATING WITH VARIOUS OTHER TRIBES OF PEOPLES THEN-AFTER THEIR "TAKE-OVER" OF BABYLON. AND HERE IS HOW BLACK AFRICAN MALIANS ARE DESCENDANTS. IN ASIA. VARIOUS PEOPLES ARE "SUM-ARYAN DESCENDANTS. FROM IRAQ AND IRAN. ALL THE WAY TO INDIA, TIBET, AND CHINA. IN SUMMARY. HERE'S WHERE THE "BLACK NORTHERN AFRICAN CAUCASIAN", THE "MIXED-RACE MIDDLE EASTERN CAUCASIAN", THE "SOUTH EAST ASIAN CAUCASIAN", AND THE "CHINESE AND EAST ASIAN CAUCASIAN" LOOKS ORIGINATED FROM. !THEY TOO WHO ARE "CAUCASIAN'S" TODAY. |
Genesis 10.2-4
The
sons
of
Japheth:
Gomer, Magog,
Madai,
Javan,
Tubal,
Meshech
and
Tiras.
The
sons
of
Gomer:
Ashkenaz,
Riphath
and
Togarmah.
The
sons
of
Javan:
Elishah,
Tarshish,
the
Kittim
and
the
Rodanim.
Ezekiel 38.2
"Son
of
man,
set
your
face
against Gog,
of the land of Magog
Revelation 20.79
When
the
thousand
years
are
over,
Satan
will
be
released
from
his
prison
and
will
go
out
to
deceive the
nations in the four corners of the earth--Gog and Magog--to
gather them for battle. In number they are like the sand on the
seashore. They marched across the breadth of the earth and surrounded
the camp of God's people, the city he loves. But fire came down from
heaven and devoured them.
Sounds pretty simple to me. Gog and Magog are definitely from the Tribes of Japheth, and so is many of the White Peoples in the world. The Bible also describes them as the "Nations in the four corners of the earth". Not just Russia, like the White so-called Biblical Scholars are identifying today as. They are the White and Yellow Russian's, as well as the White European's, the White American's, and the White Israelis. Because Gog and Magog is scattered around the Earth, and they are "White Peoples". God's People's True Enemy. Yet today they are attempting to place the Face of the Enemy on the Arabs. As if they are the True and Final Enemy of the World. Just to disguise their own identity, as Gog and Magog.
Furthermore the Bible states that Magog and Gog will come-down from the "North" with a great Horde or Army. I have read where all kinds of White so-called Biblical Scholars have attempted to identify Magog and Gog as Russia, China, Turkey, Iran, Iraq, and even the Aleutians and Eskimos. But they always seem to exclude themselves. Their own peoples from Europe and America. The people from the north with great Armies and Hordes. First of all Gog and Magog will come down with a great Horde or Army. Now who in the world today have such a military power? A power capable of defeating all of God's People. I'll tell you who; Europe, America, and Russia (China included with Russia). These are the peoples who are Gog and Magog.
The Tribe of Magog descended from Japheth became the Scythian's. This is a well known historical fact. From there they became the Russian's and the German's. And the English and the American's This is a known historical fact also. It was even known in Ancient Roman times. The most advanced tribes of the Scythian's were known to the Romans under the name of "German's". !Here is your Magog. Let me continue by exposing the Magogian's. Many of them migrated to America. !Yes America has a large German Descendant population. !American Magogian's. Then others migrated to Israel between the years of 1904 to 1952. !Israelis Magogian's.
Let
me
give
you
the
complete
Magogian
and
Gogian
history
now.
Japheth
to
Magog
and
Gomer.
Magog
to
the
Scythian's.
The
Scythian's
to
the
Russian's,
the
Saxons,
and
the
Anglo-Saxons.
The
Saxons
to
the
German's.
The
Anglo-Saxons
to
the
English.
The
German's
and
the
English
to
the
White
American's.
Gomer
to
Togarmah,
to
Gog.
Gog
to
the
Kimmerian's
(Cimmerian's).
The
Kimmerian's
to
the
Celts.
The
Celts
to
the
Irish,
the
German's,
and
to
the
English.
The
Irish,
the
German's,
and
the
English
to
the
White
American's
again.
Now
the
Russian
Jews,
the
German
Jews,
and
other
European
Jews (like
the
Askenazi and
Khazars) to Israel. Where they are the White Jews in Israel today.
But I don't need to go back thousands of years in history to prove that White Peoples are Gog and Magog. Recent history only hundreds of years ago will prove it also. Because Gog and Magog are the peoples who have perpetrated the greatest atrocities in the world. Upon other peoples. They are the peoples who have conquested, or attempted to conquest others. No other peoples of the world can compare to what they have done to the other peoples of the world. History does not lie, and it has proven them to be the greedy, selfish, and oppressive; Capitalist, Communist, Socialist, and Fascist Peoples of the world.
NOW THERE IS SOMETHING THAT'S VERY
MYSTERIOUS ABOUT THE ORIGIN OF
THE !VICIOUS TRIBES OF "MAGOG" AND "GOG". MEANING THAT. THE MAGOG AND
GOD TRIBES I WAS SPEAKING OF PRIOR. ARE INDEED FROM "JAPHETH". THE
TRIBE
OF "MAGOG" THAT WAS DIRECTLY DESCENDED FROM JAPHETH. THEY OF WHOM MOVED
IMMEDIATELY NORTH INTO THE AREA THAT IS "GEORGIA" AND "RUSSIA" TODAY.
THEM BECOMING THE "SCYTHIAN'S" THEN-AFTER. THEN THE TRIBE OF "GOG"
THAT'S
DESCENDED FROM THE TRIBE OF "GOMER". THEY (MAGOG AND GOG) OF WHOM
MIGRATED "NORTH" OF THE CAUCASUS
MOUNTAIN REGION/S. AS PER MY MAP DIAGRAM BELOW. THE CAUCASUS, BLACK SEA
AND
CASPIAN SEA REGION THEN. THAT WAS !MUCH !MUCH DIFFERENT FROM TODAY.
BECAUSE BACK THEN. IT WAS PRETTY-MUCH "FLOODED" FROM THE WATERS OF THE
PRIOR !GREAT FLOOD OF NOAH. THE WATER THAT DID NOT TOTALLY "RECEDE"
BACK THEN. UNTIL THOUSANDS OF YEARS LATER. AND WHEN IF FINALLY DID,
THEN-AFTER. IT ALLOWED THE TRIBES OF GOG AND MAGOG TO MIGRATE INTO
EUROPE AND ASIA FURTHER.
BUT AS YOU CAN SEE IN MY MAP DIAGRAM ABOVE.
MANY THOUSANDS OF
YEARS PRIOR TO THAT. THEY "COULD NOT" BECAUSE OF THE HIGH WATER THAT
SURROUNDED THEM THEN. AND BOTH TRIBES WERE THEN "CONFINED" WITHIN THE
REGION THEN. AND THE ONLY WAY OUT FOR THEM THEN. BEING THE WAY THEY
HAD COME ORIGINALLY (FROM MOUNT "ARARAT" IN TURKEY). AND THAT WAY BEING
VIA
THE "DARIEL/DARYAL GORGE !AH. AND LATER THEM BEING VIRTUALLY "TRAPPED"
IN THE AREA. IN "MASS". AFTER THE PASS WAS "GATED-OFF" THEN-AFTER.
AFTER THEY HAD BEGAN TO "MULTIPLY" IN MASS PRIOR. THEN DESCEND DOWN THE
PASS BACK INTO TURKEY AND ELSEWHERE THEN-AFTER. THEM THEN AS LEGEND
STATES.
CAUSING "HAVOC" AND ALL SORTS OF OTHER TROUBLE THEN. WHICH IS THE VERY
REASON WHY THE PASS WAS "GATED-OFF" AGAINST THEM THEN-AFTER, IN THE
FIRST PLACE. THE JAPHETHIAN TRIBES OF "MAGOG" AND "GOG". THAT WERE
!VERY !VERY
"VIOLENT". AND
!VERY !VERY "EVIL". COMPARED
TO
OTHER
JAPHETHIAN
TRIBES
THAT
HAD
MIGRATED
ELSEWHERE.
LIKE
THE
TRIBES
OF;
"TIRAS"
(ITALY),
"JAVAN"
(GREECE),
"MADIA"
(IRAN),
"TUBAL"
(TURKEY),
AND
"MESHECH"
(TURKEY).
THOSE
"OTHER"
JAPHETHIAN
TRIBES
THAT
"WERE
NOT"
AS
"LIGHT
SKIN"
IN
COMPLEXION.
VERSUS
THEIR
"GOMER/GOG"
AND
"MAGOG"
TRIBAL
COUSINS
WERE.
-
ANCIENT HISTORY STATING HOW THE JAPHETHIAN TRIBES OF "TIRAS" AND "JAVAN". WERE ORIGINALLY A !MUCH !MUCH DARKER SKINNED CAUCASIAN PEOPLES. LIKE MIXED-RACE MULATTO PEOPLES ARE TODAY. THEM BEING 3 SHADES DARKER. AND THE JAPHETHIAN TRIBE OF "MADIA" ALSO BEING ORIGINALLY DARKER SKINNED. THEM BEING 2 SHADES DARKER. THEM ALL BEING SHADES "DARKER" THAN JAPHETH, THEIR FATHER. AND THE TRIBES OF "TUBAL" AND "MESHECH" BEING A SHADE DARKER THAN JAPHETH. !THIS ALL BEING VIA "GENETICS". !THAT BEING ACCOMPLISHED ALSO BECAUSE THE 3 WIVES (WIFE OF SHEM - "SEDEQETELEBAB", WIFE OF HAM - "NE'ELATAMA'UK" OR "NA'ELTAMA'UK", WIFE OF JAPHETH - "ADATANESES") OF HAM, SHEM, AND JAPHETH. WERE OF DIFFERENT SKIN TONES ALSO. !OF COURSE THEY ALL WERE. - ALLOW
ME
TO
EXPLAIN.
IT
BEING
REALLY
!VERY
!VERY
SIMPLE.
NOAH
(WHO
WAS
A
BLACK
PERSON. AS SHOWN IN ANCIENT FRESCO BY THE ANCIENT GREEKS ABOVE.)
AND
HIS WIFE "EMZARA" (WHO WAS WHITE.
AS ALSO SHOWN IN ANCIENT FRESCO BY THE ANCIENT GREEKS ABOVE.).
"EMZARA" WHO WAS ALSO "NAAMAH" IN THE "QURAN". HER SAID TO BE AN "EVIL
DEMONIST" AND A "KABBALISTIC PRACTITIONER". ACCORDING TO THE "BIBLE";
SHE WAS THE DAUGHTER OF "LAMECH". AND HER BROTHER WAS "TUBAL-CAIN".
!HER ALSO SAID TO BE THE MOTHER OF A 4TH SON OF NOAH NAMED "YAM" OR
"KAN'AN". !HE OF WHOM WHO WAS SAID TO "NOT" BOARD THE ARK BOAT. BECAUSE
HE TOO WAS A "KABBALISTIC
PRACTITIONER". !HIM "NOT" BELIEVING IN HIS FATHER "NOAH". IT WAS SAID. !AH. SO "THAT" WILL EXPLAIN THE "EVIL OF
WHITE PEOPLES" !TODAY THEN.
SHE AND NOAH WHO GAVE THEIR GENETIC SKIN-TONE DESCENDASY TO EVERY SKIN SHADE OF PERSON THEN-AFTER. AFTER THE FLOOD. VIA THE "MULTIPLE" MIXED GENETICS THAT A BLACK AND A WHITE PERSON CAN ACHIEVE TOGETHER VIA MATING. BLACK AND WHITE GENETICS THAT CAN ACHIEVE EVERY GENETIC SKIN COLOR IN BETWEEN. IN THIS CASE. EVERY OTHER SKIN TONE. NOAH WHO WAS A BLACK PERSON. WHILST HIS WIFE "EMZARA" WAS A WHITE PERSON. !HAM, NOAHS SON BEING A BLACK PERSON (SLIGHTLY LIGHTER THAN NOAH). !SHEM, NOAHS SON BEING A MIXED-RACE PERSON (IN BETWEEN NOAHS AND HIS WIFE'S SKIN TONES). AND !JAPHETH, NOAH'S SON BEING A WHITE PERSON (SLIGHTLY DARKER THAN HIS MOTHERS SKIN TONE.). WITH THE LATER TRIBES FROM THE 3 SONS BEING MANY VARIATIONS OF SUCH. -
WITH THE
"CRO-MAGNON"
LIKE MAGOG AND THE GOG TRIBAL PEOPLES. BEING THE "SO-CALLED"
WHITEST OF SUCH PERSONS THOUGH. IN THE SHADE OF NOAH'S WIFE. BECAUSE
THEY WERE LATER "CUT-OFF" FROM THE
REST OF THE TRIBES THEN-AFTER THE FLOOD. AFTER THEY WENT NORTH. THEM
BEING THE TRIBES WHO MIGRATED FURTHER NORTH. THEM
THEN BEING "ISOLATED" OR THEY HAD "ISOLATED" THEMSELVES THEN-AFTER.
!THEY OF WHOM ALSO HAD TO HAVE BEEN THE STRONGEST "CARRIERS" OF THE
ANCIENT !VIOLENT "CRO-MAGNON" GENETICS. THAT WAS PASSED-TO THEM VIA
JAPHETH. VIA JAPHETH'S MOTHER. !THAT OF WHICH HAD TO HAVE BEEN THE
REASON WHY THE TWO TRIBES HAD TURNED OUT TO BE SO "VIOLENT" LATER. AND
THEN SO
"HATED" THEN-AFTER? CAUSING OTHER'S WHO LIVED SOUTH OF THEM. TO
"WALL-THEM-OUT".- THEN-AFTER THE FLOOD WATERS HAD "RECEDED FURTHER. THE MAGOG AND GOG TRIBES. AS THE SCYTHIAN'S AND THE CIMMERIANS (INDO SAKA SCYTHIAN'S). MIGRATED NORTH INTO NORTHERN EUROPE. WEST INTO WESTERN EUROPE. AND EAST AND SOUTH EAST INTO ASIA. THE CIMMERIANS (INDO SAKA SCYTHIAN'S) MIGRATED NORTH AND WEST INTO EUROPE. AND THE SCYTHIAN'S EAST AND SOUTH EAST INTO ASIA. BOTH TRIBES GIVING-RISE TO MANY OTHER TRIBES THEN-AFTER. THAT WERE LIGHTER IN SKIN TONE. THE SCYTHIAN'S AND THE CIMMERIANS (INDO SAKA SCYTHIANS) THAT WERE EITHER "WALLED-OFF" AND/OR "GATED-OFF" FROM MANY OTHER MIDDLE EASTERN TRIBES OF HAM AND SHEM THOUGH PRIOR. AND "THERE" WAS THE REASON FOR THE MANY WALLS AND THE MANY GATES I'VE SPOKEN OF ABOVE. TO KEEP THEM OUT. THE SCYTHIAN'S AND THE CIMMERIANS (INDO SAKA SCYTHIAN'S). THAT WERE THE "WHITEST-OF-WHITE" IN SKIN COMPLEXION. FOR 2 REASON. VIA GENETICS FIRST. THEN VIA CLIMATE. THEM BEING THE "PEOPLES OF THE NORTHERN REGIONS". WHO GAVE-RISE TO THE NORTHERN EUROPEANS AND NORTHERN ASIANS. AND TO THE "WHITE MONGOLIC-TYPE PEOPLES". THE WHITE MONGOLIC-TYPE PEOPLES WHO'S HISTORY IS "VIOLENT". BECAUSE THEY WERE THE DESCENDANT'S OF MAGOG AND GOG. |
-
HERE BELOW BEING "OTHER PROOF"
THAT ALSO
"EXPOSES" THE WHITE EGYPT
LIE/S":
-http://www.egyptsearch.com/forums/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=15;t=005962
- A R1b King Tut
resulted
in postings all over the web about King Tut being European.
-DNA Tribes releases
a
result based on 8 forensic
autosomal STR markers, of the "Amarna Pharaohs".
-- And the Web goes quiet. No newspapers picking it up. Nothing. When it was just a hint of R1b there was an uproar. But now that there's a hint of things going the completely opposite way - quiet. - http://dougsarchaeology.wordpress.com/2011/08/09/scam-alert-king-tuts-dna/
Scam Alert: King Tut’s DNA - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebAXrWxtBK4 KING TUT DNA R1B WHITE LIES EXPOSED!! - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49dSZaVSZQE King Tut's DNA Western European? Wrong!!! - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9hxX1Ehmp0 King Tut was NOT white! DNA study confirms this. - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hP1fQhDiTzA REAL King Tut DNA Test = BLACK 100% - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5wLCVpBjhk Black Ancient Egypt cover up conspiracy, racist Zahi Hawass exposed - Robert Bauva - http://stewartsynopsis.com/evolvement_of_king_tut.htm King Tut Changes From Black to White - http://blackinamerica.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?thread_id=17226 Nat'l Geographic PURPOSELY LIES...gives King Tut "NEW" White face... - http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread225876/pg1 King tut was Black |
1 Kings 10:1 And when the
queen of Sheba heard of the fame of Solomon concerning the name of the
LORD, she
came
to
prove
him
with
hard
questions.
2 And she came
to
Jerusalem
with
a very great train, with camels that bare spices, and very much gold,
and
precious stones: and when she was come to Solomon, she communed with
him
of all that was in her heart.
3 And Solomon
told her
all
her
questions: there was not any thing hid from the king, which he told her
not.
4 And when the
queen
of
Sheba had
seen all Solomon's wisdom, and the house that he had built,
5 And the meat
of his
table, and
the sitting of his servants, and the attendance of his ministers, and
their
apparel, and his cupbearers, and his ascent by which he went up unto
the
house of the LORD; there was no more spirit in her.
6 And she said
to the
king,
It
was a true report that I heard in mine own land of thy acts and of thy
wisdom.
7 How be it I
believed
not
the
words,
until I came, and mine eyes had seen it: and, behold, the half was not
told me: thy wisdom and prosperity exceedeth the fame which I heard.
8 Happy are thy
men,
happy
are
these thy servants, which stand continually before thee, and that hear
thy wisdom.
9 Blessed be the
LORD
thy
God,
which delighted in thee, to set thee on the throne of Israel: because
the
LORD loved Israel for ever, therefore made he thee king, to do judgment
and justice.
10 And she gave
the
king an
hundred
and twenty talents of gold, and of spices very great store, and
precious
stones: there came no more such abundance of spices as these which the
queen of Sheba gave to king Solomon.
11 And the navy
also
of
Hiram,
that brought gold from Ophir, brought in from Ophir great plenty of
almug
trees, and precious stones.
12 And the king
made
of the
almug
trees pillars for the house of the LORD, and for the king's house,
harps
also and psalteries for singers: there came no such almug trees, nor
were
seen unto this day.
13 And king
Solomon
gave
unto the
queen of Sheba all her desire, whatsoever she asked, beside that which
Solomon gave her of his royal bounty. So she turned and went to her own
country, she and her servants.
2 Chronicles 9:1 And when
the queen of Sheba heard of the fame of Solomon, she came to prove
Solomon
with hard questions at Jerusalem, with a very great company, and camels
that bare spices, and gold in abundance, and precious stones: and when
she was come to Solomon, she communed with him of all that was in her
heart.
2 And Solomon
told her
all
her
questions: and there was nothing hid from Solomon which he told her not.
3 And when the
queen
of
Sheba had
seen the wisdom of Solomon, and the house that he had built,
4 And the meat
of his
table, and
the sitting of his servants, and the attendance of his ministers, and
their
apparel; his cupbearers also, and their apparel; and his ascent by
which
he went up into the house of the LORD; there was no more spirit in her.
5 And she said
to the
king,
It
was a true report which I heard in mine own land of thine acts, and of
thy wisdom:
6 Howbeit I
believed
not
their
words, until I came, and mine eyes had seen it: and, behold, the one
half
of the greatness of thy wisdom was not told me: for thou exceedest the
fame that I heard.
7 Happy are thy
men,
and
happy
are these thy servants, which stand continually before thee, and hear
thy
wisdom.
8 Blessed be the
LORD
thy
God,
which delighted in thee to set thee on his throne, to be king for the
LORD
thy God: because thy God loved Israel, to establish them for ever,
therefore
made he thee king over them, to do judgment and justice.
9 And she gave
the
king an
hundred
and twenty talents of gold, and of spices great abundance, and precious
stones: neither was there any such spice as the queen of Sheba gave
king
Solomon.
10 And the
servants
also of
Huram,
and the servants of Solomon, which brought gold from Ophir, brought
algum
trees and precious stones.
11 And the king
made
of the
algum
trees terraces to the house of the LORD, and to the king's palace, and
harps and psalteries for singers: and there were none such seen before
in the land of Judah.
12 And king
Solomon
gave to
the
queen of Sheba all her desire, whatsoever she asked, beside that which
she had brought unto the king. So she turned, and went away to her own
land, she and her servants.
Matthew 12:42 The queen of the south shall rise up in the judgment with this generation, and shall condemn it: for she came from the uttermost parts of the earth to hear the wisdom of Solomon; and, behold, a greater than Solomon is here.
I
OF
WHOM
HAD
SAID
ALL
OF
THE
ABOVE
WAY
BACK
IN
2003.
IN
MY
ANCIENT HISTORY OF MANKIND E-BOOK THEN. THEN HERE
IN 2013. I HAVE
"ABSOLUTELY" CONFIRMED ALL OF THE ABOVE. VIA MY OWN
"ARABIAN" AND "SHEBAN" D.N.A. !YES I HAVE SHEBAN D.N.A. I HAD
DISCOVERED IN 2012. IT
WHICH
IS STRONGEST IN "ARABIA". THEN IT WHICH IS SECOND
STRONGEST IN THE EASTERN COAST OF AFRICA AS SHOWN HERE ON THE MAP: |
Information
taken
from
my
"Ancient
history
of
Mankind
on
Earth"
E-book.
©
Copyright
2003,
Antonio
Mark
McCoy
Sr. PHYSICAL EVIDENCE OF ATLANTIS: 1. City on the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean off Spain, found by Dr. Maxine Asher's expedition in 1973 and reported by UPI. 2. Pyramid explored by Dr. Ray Brown on the sea floor off the Bahamas in 1970. 3. Ruins of roads and buildings found off Bimini Island in the 1960's by the photographed and published expeditions of Dr. Mansan Valentine. 4. Similar underwater ruins found off Morocco and photographed 50 to 60 feet underwater. 5. A ruined harbor like complex discovered on the sea floor off Bimini by Captain john Alexander. 6. The deep sea diving submarine Aluminaut discovered a well preserved paved road on the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean make of blacktop magnesium oxide, running along the sea floor from Florida to South Carolina. 7. A huge 11 room pyramid found 10,000 feet under water in the mid Atlantic Ocean with a huge crystal top, as reported by Tony Benlk. 8. Several acres of white marble-like ruins found on tile ocean floor off Cuba reported by Lieceser Hemingway. Also a submerged city lying of the Cuban coast in 2,200 feet of water. 9. Mysterious dome structures reportedly seen in clear water by several pilots in the Straits of Florida. 10. Soviet expeditions to the Atlantic Ampere Seamount resulted in photographs of ruins destroyed by lava (like the Aztecs and Mayans wrote Atlan was destroyed by).This discovery was in the New York Times newspaper May 21, 1978. Also reported ruins found off Cadiz, Spain in the same area as Dr., Maxine Asher's previous discovery. 11. 1981 expedition of P. Cappellano discovered mysterious ruins with strange symbols on them on the sea floor off the Canary Islands. 12. 1977 report of a huge pyramid found off Cay Sal in the Bahamas, photographed by Ari Marshall's expedition, about 150 feet underwater. 13. The foundations of a 100 by 75 foot structure photographed on the sea bottom off Andros Island. 14. A sunken city about 400 miles off Portugal found by Soviet expeditions led by Boris Asturua. 15. Pillars found on the Atlantic floor in 1969 by Robert Fero and Michael Grumley. 16. Twenty researchers, including archaeologists, a marine biologist, geologist, and cartographer dove onto ruins on the sea floor off Bimini in 1975 and brought back artifacts from which they concluded that the walls and roads were made of materials not found in that part of the world. 17. The Lixus ruins on the Atlantic shore of North Africa. 18. At
the Mid Atlantic Ridge
site at 19.365° N by 30.3° W, a few Aircraft Pilots spotted an
Underwater Pyramid there. |
INFORMATION
TAKEN FROM MY "SACRED SITES AND LEY LINES" E-BOOK. © Copyright
2004 Antonio Mark McCoy Sr.
Sacred
Sights
in
the
United
States
and
Canada: Moundville,
Alabama
Bay Mounds, Arkansas Turtle Mound, Florida Etowah Mounds, Georgia
Cahokia Mounds Effigy
Mounds, Iowa Norton
Mound
Group Winterville
Mound, North Carolina Aztalan
Mounds Lizard Mound,
Wisconsin Mt. Citlatepetl
Orizaba Honduras: Huaca del Sol and Huaca de la Luna, near Trujillo Mt. Cerro la Raya and ruins of Tucume Pyramid Belize: Ruins of Altun Ha Lubantuum Guatemala: Ruins of Tikal Ruins of Kaminaljuyu Ecuador: Ruins and Pyramids of Cochasqui |
Information
taken from my "ATLANTIS"
E-book. ©
Copyright 2003, 2004,
2005, Antonio Mark McCoy Sr. - The Mayan's were
Olmec
Descendants. The Black or Brown
Mayan's were. As their were also Yellow or Golden Mayan's later in
Mayan
History. Being of a Toltechian descendasy. But the Original Mayan's
were
from the Black Olmec's. As indicated by the Original Mayan Wall
Paintings
below here.
- - The Original Mayan's were of the Black Olmec Race from Atlantis. And are not from the Toltec's from Atlantis. While ruling over Atlantis, Ancient Legends state how the Toltec's had developed psychic and paranormal abilities. As well as, having Jet Propulsion Crafts. Just like other Atlantean Races had done before them. Then it's said some of the Toltec's had begun to misuse sorcery, using their powers to control and manipulate others for evil purposes. Then their moral decay resulted in inundation's and other disasters which led to their downfall. Knocking them from power in Atlantis then. Which was around 15,867 B.C. As it's also said at that exact time, the Toltec's were conquered by the more barbarous Turanian's Who became the Ruling Atlantean Race after them of course. As Remnant's of the once Mighty Toltec's then fled to the America's. Fleeing the Turanian's then. Then taking "thousands" of years to finally gain strength again. Strength enough to conquest again themselves. In the America's after that. Which was the recorded and documented times of the Toltec's. The Hispanic
origin or
race, can indeed be traced back to the Aztec's.
But also to the Olmec's. Thus giving us the so-called White and Black
Hispanic's
today. Mitcondral D.N.A. will prove all of this. From their origin in
Atlantis,
hundreds of thousands of years later, one of their remote family races
ruled magnificently in Mexico and Peru. For long ages before their
Degenerate
Descendants were conquered by the Fiercer Aztec Tribes, who were of
their
peoples as well. The complexion of this race was also a red-brown, but
they were redder or more copper-coloured. They also were a tall race,
averaging
about eight feet during the period of their ascendancy, but of course
dwindling,
as all races did, to the dimensions that are common to-day. The
approximate
birthplace of this Race lay near the west coast of Atlantis about
latitude
30º North, and the whole of the surrounding country, embracing the
bulk of the west coast of the Ancient Continent, was peopled with a
pure
Toltec Race then. The
Toltec
and
Olmec
migrations
into
Mexico:
Now pay attention to the portion of my Ancient Lands Map below. As you will see both the Toltec and the Olmec migrations. Beginning first (1.) with the Olma coming from Mu, long before it's final sinking. As they came around 195,000 years B.C. As they came to Mexico then. Beginning an Ancient Mexican Civilization then. But (2.) they also sailed through the Ancient Amazonian Sea onto what was Southern Atlantis then. And onto Africa. As South America geologically use to be split into two halves by the Ancient Sea. A Sea that ultimately dried-up, becoming the Amazon River. Which is the very reason it is the worlds largest River today. But also the Worlds Widest River. As it's just a tiny remant of an Ancient Sea. - Any ways the
Olma
migrated to Southern Atlantis where they had resided
until the final sinking of Atlantis. As they never became a Ruling Race
whilst in Atlantis. Because the Olma were mostly Farmers and Builders.
Then the remainder of their race, fled Atlantis. Joining the others in
Mexico (3.). As they then built the Greatest Pyramid Complexes in the
area.
They were not
Warrior's like the Toltec's. The Toltec's who guarded
Western Atlantis. Guarding it from possible invasion, and from unwanted
migrations from Mu. As many a peoples from Mu migrated
around Atlantis. As you'll
see in the
map below. The Toltec's were said to have resided in Western Atlantis.
Then migrated to South America and Peru later (4.). After Atlantis
began
it's own sinking. Which was something that took a very long time to do.
As Atlantis lost lands every year to the Sea. As they did, they also
lost
population every year. And "that" was the time when Atlantis began to
expand
into it's many known Colonies around the world. As they then began to
conquest
many lands, in Africa, Asia, the Middle East, Europe, and the America's.
- Now if you pay
attention to the Map or Diagram below. Which
was "sketched" from a previously Ancient Map, in 1931. You'll see a
similar
migration as I have. But what they labeled as the "Negroid" Migration
Line
from Mu, is the same Olma Migrant Line I had found. Basically I found
the
same migration that was spoken of in legend. But also found that the
Olma
went to Mexico and Central America as well as Africa and Atlantis. As
the
Atlantean's did allow them into Atlantis, since they were only Farmers
and Builders. They though, in their Map, show no Olma (or Negroid)
migration
into
Atlantis. Then they speak of a "Carian" Migration Line. Now who in the
hell were the Cara, or the Carian's? The "Original", not the Latter
Carian's,
were
the First Carthaginian's. And were a
Powerful Sea-going Race of peoples. Ones who were also the the same as
the Phoenician's. Who were that same well-known Sea Fairing Race. As it
is a historical fact that the Ancient Phoenician's settled Carthage.
Who
are the same as the Cara Peoples from
Mu.
As they did
later
conquest most of the Mediterranean Sea. But the
map above also shows them migrating into Mexico. !What?
Apparently they
did. The
Carian's were not "African" in a sense. And were more of a Mulatto
mixture.
But many of them were dark skinned. As they later settled Egypt, as
well
as a large portion on the Middle East. As well as Greece. Or what was
called
Ancient Athens long ago. As the Ancient Athenian's, the Egyptian's, and
the Ancient Phoenician's and Carthaginian's are
all cousin through D.N.A. relations. Because the Cara
from
the
Motherland
of
Mu
were
their
Ancestors. The other Negroid's from
Mu were the Olma. Which are
different from
the Cara. Having more "Bushier Hair". While the Cara were more like
Dark-skinned
East Indian's. While many of the Olma were some-what Polonisian-Black
in
appearance. As Mu wasn't called the Motherland for nothing. As it was
indeed
the Motherland of all of the Black, Brown, and Red Races.
Mu came before Atlantis, Lemuria, Babylon, Egypt, India, and all of the other European, African, and Asian Civilizations. As the Motherland of Mu rose around 912,388 B.C. Then began sinking in 195,988 B.C. The very time when the migrations from Mu began. Then is finally and violently sank around 23,188 B.C. So the Ancient Cara migration into the Mediterranean Sea Area, and into Mexico, began some 95,988 years before the first Homo Sapien Sapiens arrived in Africa. As it was probally the Peoples from Mu who initiated it all? As I said in another of my E-Books. Saying how our Homo Sapien Sapien existance probally began from these peoples? The Cara were in Mexico that far back, but so was the Negroid's. Or the Olma. But it was very obvious that the Olma did not in any way dominate Mexico then. Being Farmers and Builders, as they were. The non- threatning Olma were allowed in Atlantis, but not the Cara though. As the Cara then went around Atlantis, onto Europe, Africa, and Asia. But also Mexico. As the Cara were much more successful than the Olma. And soon the Cara became the Enemies of Atlantis. As Atlantis then attempted to expand onto the lands of the Very Successful Cara. Who had dominated all of Egypt, Libya (which was all of North Africa at that time), Mexico, Southern Europe, the Middle East, as well as India. As the Cara then became many different peoples then. As they then opposed the Toltec's in Western Atlantis. Western Atlantis that was no longer connected to Mexico in those times. As Atlantis had many a war and battle against the Cara from the Motherland of Mu. Which went-down in legendary history as the wars between Atlantis and Mu. Since the Cara were from Mu. But later two factions of the Cara, the Egyptian's and the Athenian's, defeated the Atlantean's. The
Mayan's:
It was indeed both the Olmec's and the Toltec's who gave-rise to the Most Intelligent Mayan's. The Mayan's who were probably the first, second, or third smartest people in "ALL" of Earth's History. If second? They would be only second to either the Ancient Egyptian's, or the Ancient Athenian's. No others though. As the Ancient Mayan's great knowledge is still not fully realized by us even today. As they also mastered Pyramid building, as well as astrology. Despite what you might have heard, there were "NO" White Mayan's. There were only Brown Mayan's, Tan or Golden Mayan's, and Light Tan or Yellow Mayan's. And as I stated a bit earlier, the Lighter Complicated Mayan's were of Toltechian origin. As the Great Mayan's were the result of the Toltec's and the Olmec's. As they both created an Incredibly Intelligent Peoples. Which was a result of both races Atlantean Knowledge. - The worlds Two
Greatest Civilization's were ushered-in by the Ancient
Egyptian's (to include the Ancient Nubian's, as well as Ancient
Athenian's),
and by the Mayan's (who were Toltecian and Olmecian in origin). The
Mayan's
are regarded as the Inventors of many aspects of Meso-American Cultures
including the first Calendar and Hieroglyphic Writing in the Western
Hemisphere.
Conventional Archeologists have not settled the relationship between
the
Olmec's and the Mayan's. !Duh. As they see it as a mystery whether the
Mayan's were the Olmec's descendants, trading partners, or had another
relationship. It is agreed though, that the Mayan's developed a Complex
Calendar (which is still better and more accurate than any of our
Calendars
today) and the most elaborate form of Hieroglyphics in America. Both
which
were based on the Olmec's versions. So what the hell does that tell
"these"
Conventional Archeologist, and their equally as dumb Historian Friends?
The Mayan's earliest mentioned leader and deified hero was Itzamná. Being considered to be simply a Sun-God common to the Mayan Civilization. He is represented as having led the first migration from the Far East, beyond the Ocean. From "Atlantis". Which is merely a repeat of Olma and Toltec accounts. As that was said to have been the first migration. The second migration, which seems to have been historic, was led from the west by Kukulcan. Who was a Miraculous Priest and Teacher like the Egyptian Inotep was. As Kukulcan became the founder of the Mayan Kingdom and Civilization. Based upon study of the Mayan's Chronicles and Calendar, places this beginning near the close of the second century of the Christian Era. Under Kukulcan
the
Mayan People were divided into four tribes, ruled
by as many kingly families, the; Cocom, Tutul-xiu, Itzá, and
Chele.
To the first family belonged Kukulcan himself, who established his
residence
at Mayanspan. Which became the capital of the entire nation. The
Tutul-xiu
held vassal rule at Uxmal, the Itzá at Chichen-Itzá, and
the Chelé at Izamal. To the Chele was appointed the hereditary
high
priesthood, and their city became the Sacred City of the Mayan's. Later
on at Mayapan, until about the middle of the fifteenth century, was a
revolt
against the reigning dynasty. As the monarchy was split up into a
number
of Independent Petty States then. In which eighteen existed on the
peninsula
at the time of the arrival of the Spaniard's.
Chichen Itza was
first
populated between 500 and 900 A.D. by Mayan's.
Then for some reason abandoned around 900 A.D. The Great City was then
resettled 100 years later and subsequently invaded by Toltec's from the
North. And "that" was the time when the Toltec Mayan Descendasies
began.
For some reason (some Scientist say drought) the city was abandoned
again
around 1300. And if the inferior and very very jealous Spanish Invaders
not made it a policy to kill all of the Mayan Priests. And to burn all
the Mayan Books, when they arrived in Mexico. We would all have a few
more
answers to our very origins. As the Selfishly Envious and Jealous
Spanish,
had done exactly as the Roman's had done to the Egyptian's Books of
Knowledge.
Despite all of their attempts to erase the great knowledge of the
Mayan's
and the Egyptian's. The world still knows that they were both the
Worlds
Greatest Civilizations. And both Great
Civilizations, have the Worlds Greatest Pyramids to
prove their great and vast knowledge. Both Civilizations are also
related
to the God "Thoth". As I'll explain exactly why later in the book. As
Thoth
was the God of Wisdom. Possibly the wisest of all the Gods? As he was
also
a/the Messenger of the Higher Gods. And his peoples were the Hispanic's
(the pre-Hispanic's) and the Egyptian African's. As all the African's
are
not the same though. Neither is all the Hispanic's. As the Hispanic
origins
is complexed. As most of the Hispanic's are of
Toltec and Olmec
origin. While
others are
of Inca, and other Indian origins. Not being Toltecian or Olmecian in
origin
(speaking of a time before the Spanish Invaders). Note that I'm using
the
term "Hispanic", to describe the pre-Hispanic Peoples. Using it to
identify
all the pre-Hispanic Descendant's today. Who are labeled as Hispanic
today.
Mexican's and Mexican American's are mostly all Toltecian and Olmecian
in origin. Mayan as well. African American's are not all Egyptian in
origin.
Even though you hear many of them clinging-on to the Egyptian origin
claim.
We are "not" all Atlantean Stock either.
|
Information
taken from my "ATLANTIS"
E-book. © Copyright 2003, 2004,
2005, Antonio Mark McCoy Sr. - THE
PRE-HISPANIC
PYRAMID
BUILDERS:
-- Thoth was the God of Wisdom. And he directed the building of the "FIRST" Pyramid Complex at Teotihuacan. As legend states that the builders of the Great City were Atlantean God-Kings who fled the destruction of Atlantis. But I have already shown you geometric alignments that connect Teotihuacan with Giza, Egypt. As the God Thoth was a ruler in both Pyramid Civilizations. As he was known as; Thoth to the Atlantean's and the Egyptian's. Kukulcan to the Mexican, Central American, and South American's. But also Quetzalcoatl. Then Ea (Enik) in Ancient Babylon. Which they were incorrect about though because he was the son of Ea. Not Ea himself. He was also called God Tehuti in Ancient Atlantis. So it is Thoth who taught Mankind the Pyramid Building knowledge. Thoth who was known as a Reptilian-Bird, Shape-shifting Man. Appearing as a Black Man to the Ancient Egyptian's. Then a Shape-shifting Bird-Reptilian White or Pale-Man to the Mayan's. As the three pieces of artwork display him below here: I discovered
exactly
"what" Thoth was in another of my E-Books.
And who exactly he is, and where he is from. As he is very very
ancient,
and a Son of a much higher God. !Satan. Which does not necessarily make
him evil like Satan is. Which I had so revealed in my "Children of
the
God's" E-Book. The Brown Mayan and the Black Egyptian's knew of
Thoth
very well. As he was the Instructor of the building of the two greatest
Pyramid Complexes on Earth. Which use to be three, before Atlantis had
sank.
He directed the Olmec's before the Mayan's. As the Olmec's built the Pyramids at; Alton Ha, Calakmul, Caracol, Palenque, Tikal, Uxmal, Monte Alban, Tenochtitlán, and many other locations. The Olmec's built these Pyramid Complexes, but others got credit for their construction. Which is incorrect. Since others like the Toltec's, the Mayan's, and the Aztec's, mererly inherited the Olmec's Pyramid Complexes, after they were built. Then built-over them in their own Pyramidial style. Later the Olmec's Mayan Descendants re-built (or built-over or upon) many of these great Pyramid Locations. And "that" is the model of Pyramid building. To re-build over older structures. Just like we today remodel our own buildings. Or merely tear them down, then rebuild them later in the exact same locations. As it was proven at Teotihuacan. Now all the Scientist who are dating these Great Pyramid Sites, are doing it all wrong. And should be looking to date the much older structures that are within or underneath the newer ones.
Instead they are doing it backwards. It was proven at the Giza Pyramid Complex as well. As it was previously believed the site was just some 4000 years olds. When in reality it was at least 12500 years old. So the Teotihuacan Site could be the same age? But is probably more near the 11000 year age. Now everyone in the Archaeological Community debates to exactly who built the Teotihuacan Site. Debate no more, because it was Thoth. Then the Cholula Pyramid Site was built by another Fleeing Atlantean, the Giant Xelhua. As legend states. After the building of those two much older Pyramid Complexes, the Olmec's had built theirs, according to Thoth's plan. Then later the Toltec's built a few, at Tula and at Chichen Itza. As Chichen Itza was a joint Toltec Mayan Pyramid Site. The Mayan's built Xochicalo alone though. And there are many others. As Mexico and Central America is littered with Pyramids. As no other place on the Earth has as many Pyramid Sites. !No place. Not China nor Egypt or the Sudan. All of these
legends
and accounts are very real. As real as the Great
Pyramid Complexes that are still standing today. !That real. As they
were
built in; AUSTRALIA, BELIZE, BOLIVIA, BRAZIL, CHINA, TIBET, ECUADOR,
EGYPT,
EL SALVADOR, JAPAN, INDONESIA, PERU, CANARY ISLANDS, SUDAN,
TAHITI, NORTH AMERICA, IRAQ, and other places. In different styles,
from
Ziggurats to Dirt Mounds. To Solid Limestone, Sandstone, and Granite.
All
of which though, represented the same thing. Ancient wisdom that is now
lost to us today.
|
Information
taken
from
my Ancient History of Mankind
on Earth.
© Copyright 2003, Antonio Mark McCoy
Sr.
This is proven by the scientific fact that we as humans on this Earth only use 10-13% of our Brain's Neo Cortex. Coupled with the fact that a complete record of human evolution has not been found through fossil records. There are so-called "Missing Links" that exist. These are all obviously discrepancies that we did not "completely" evolve on this Earth. Because we are partially a product of genetic engineering, just as the Bible said in Genesis. So who do you think did the genetic engineering if we all have Mitochondria D.N.A. from an African Woman? Especially if God and the Elohim's made us in their Images? Who also do you think left ten of our Twelve Strands of D.N.A. disconnected? - The first "Man" created, "Male and Female" are the "Lulu Amelu". Homo Sapiens. Who did multiply and spread throughout the Earth, which is also supported by fossil records. It took them over 200,000 years but they did finally subdue the Earth. Then the next Man he created was "Adam", the first Homo Sapien Sapien, who began around 100,000 years B.C. The God's were also said to have cloned the "Shaggies", which were also known as the "Enkiduites". They are the "Big Foots" to us. After the failure of the previous Lulu Amelu and Shaggy Beings they spliced their own Genes to give rise to the "Adamites". !Us. Now before you get to far in your disbelief, listen to this; "We have a Brain that we are not currently capable of fully utilizing yet. This is because we only utilize 2 of the 12 Strands of our D.N.A. If we only utilize 2 strands, then why can we not, and do not utilize the other 10? The answer is; either someone disconnected our other 10 strands, or we never evolved to utilize them all. Because the present body form we have was inherited from another race of peoples or Beings that did utilize their full Brain capacity and D.N.A. Strands. - Some people call the other ten strands of D.N.A. "Junk D.N.A.", if it was junk, why is it connected within our cells? Our/the first strand of D.N.A. is our/the need to survive. This is the same basic need that other Animals posses also. This is the need for nourishment, the need for shelter, the need for protection, and other basic and necessary needs. Our/The second strand is our/the want for pleasure. This is not a need, it is our want/s. Sex and other "so-called" adrenaline rushes are of this nature. So the Anunnaki connected only these two strands, just for our survival and pleasure. Making us creatures of habit and limited capacity, that way they could manipulate us based on these things. The vast majority (well over 98%) of Humans on Earth only operate within the two D.N.A. Strands. All they care about is survival and pleasure. The go to work, then enjoy myself type attitudes. They think that's all the life has to offer. But there are those who seek a higher understandings of the Cosmos around them. These peoples are probably tuning (or being tuned) into their third strand of D.N.A. They are the worlds Great Thinkers, Knowledge Givers, and the Discovers of Higher Levels of Intelligence. An intelligence that is hidden within our own Human Mind. Something we can only unlock when we meditate or dream. - Information taken from my Ultimate Evolution E-Book © Copyright 2005, Antonio Mark McCoy Sr. All life on Earth now uses D.N.A. as an Information Storage Molecule. As to produce the next copy of itself. And these complexed Microorganisms are doing just that. Insuring their survival by producing copies of themselves. Thus we have Cell division because of it. So the D.N.A. Program deals with the way that information is expressed in cellular growth and metabolism. So D.N.A. from one Being or Animal, is transmitted to another. Which is the instruction to produce another exactly like it. And this is also the basis of Cloning. But we have mothers and fathers. Therefore we receive the D.N.A from both mothers and fathers. Which produces slightly different Animals each time. Because of the two different D.N.A.'s from a mother and from a father. What kinds of traits are inherited. Like of
course;
height, skin pigment,
hair texture and color, etc... Very basic stuff. But also the acquired
characteristics as well. Which can be passed-along from generation to
generation.
And therefore inherited as traits. An example of a acquired
characteristic
is like the ability of a particular peoples to withstand the cold
weather,
longer than other. Like the Eskimo Peoples. Or peoples who have to
ability
to withstand extreme hot temperatures. Like peoples who live around the
Earth's Equator. Etc... But basically many other things are inherited
as
well. Sometimes even obesity. Now a lot of people are out there
claiming
to have inherited this. While very few actually did. But it can be
inherited.
Now as I said earlier. Human Intelligence "CANNOT" be inherited. But
the
capacity for intelligencecan be though. We all have a certain
capacity for
intelligence.
But some persons have a greater capacity though. |
Information
taken
from
my
AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORY E-BOOK. ©
Copyright
2005, Antonio Mark McCoy Sr. - CHAPTER
#6. BLACK HISTORY
TIME
CHART:
The Wasitaw Peoples, and the Black Californian's, both originated from the Motherland of Mu as well. And then survived all the way up to the colonization of the America's by the White Europeans. As each peoples were of course pushed-off their lands. Exterminated, as well as absorbed into the new american society. These were peoples of great stature in the past. !Giants, as told about by many a Spanish Explorer. So were the Black Adena from Atlantis. - CHAPTER #3. Civilizations started by Blacks: The Washitaw, the Black Californian's, the Jamassee, the Califunami (Kalifunami), and other pre-Columbian Blacks of North America were mostly descendants of a prehistoric trade network that began in Africa and spread worldwide over 100,000 years ago, and at various periods afterwards. Many of these peoples migrated to MU, Lemuria, and Atlantis, but some are exclusively from MU. The Black Californian came from MU, to occupy the Western American coast over 75,000 years ago. The Washitaw Peoples were direct descendants from MU, that mass migrated to America around 27,000 years B.C. They called America "Washitaw de Dugdahmoundyah". Around 10,000 B.C. the Washitaw Mound builders of the South Western U.S. build Mounds and were engaged in agriculture and maritime activity as well as trade and commerce, in the Mississippi Region. - CHAPTER #5. OTHER PRE-COLUMBIAN BLACK'S IN AMERICA: The Black Californian's and their legendary Black Amazon Queen Calafia, arrived from MU also. The State of California is named after her. The Spaniard's that evaded America in the latter years told stories about her Amazonian Warrior Descendants. "These were the legendary Amazon Women". The Black Californian's fought until the late 1800's to maintain control of their ancestral lands. Jamassee descendants are scattered throughout Northern Florida, Georgia, Alabama, and South Carolina, while Kalifunami Descendants are scattered throughout the West Indian Islands and Central America. |
Information
taken from my; BLACK
ORIGINS.
THE
CHILDREN
OF
THE
GODS
E-BOOK.
By ANtonio
Mark
McCoy
Sr. - *"Abnormally Large Human Bones", in Stone Graves were found in Williamson County, Tennessee, in 1821. - *"Skeletons of Gigantic Stature" (at least 7 feet in height) were found In White County, Tennessee. - *"Giant Skeletons" were found in the mid-1800's near Rutland and Rodman, New York. - *"A Skeleton of Unusually Large Size" was found in a Mound at Ashland, County, Ohio. - *"A Nine-foot Skeleton" was excavated from a Mound near Brewersville, Indiana, in 1879. - *"A Skeleton of Enormous Dimensions" was found in a Clay Coffin, near Zanesville, Ohio, in 1880. - *"Ten Skeletons of Gigantic Size" were taken from a Mound at Warren, Minnesota, in 1883. - *"Seven Skeletons 7 to 8 feet tall" were discovered in Minnesota in 1888. - *"The Skeleton of a Huge Man" was uncovered at the Beckley Farm, Lake Koronis, Minnesota. - *"Skeletons 8 to 10 feet tall" were found in the Humboldt Lake bed near Lovelock, Nevada, in 1931. - *"An 8 foot Skeleton" was found buried under a rock ledge along the Holly Creek in east central Kentucky, in 1965. - *"A 6 toed Human Foot Print" 16 inches long and 13 inches wide was discovered at Braystown, North Carolina. - *"A Nine Foot Tall Skeleton" was found at Brewesville, Indiana in 1879. - *"22 inch long and 16 inch wide" human foot prints were found at Alkali Flats (White-Sands), New Mexico, in 1931. - *Two
miles
from
Mandan
North
Dakota,
on
the
bluffs
near
the
junction
of
the
Hart
and
Missouri
Rivers.
The Pioneer,
is
an
old
cemetery
of
fully
100
acres
in
extent
filled
with
bones
of
a
Giant
Race.
This
vast
city
of
the
dead
lies
just
east
of
the
Fort
Lincoln
Road.
The
ground
has
the
appearance
of
having
been
filled
with
trenches piled
full
of
dead
bodies,
both
man
and
beast,
and
covered
with
several
feet
of
Earth.
This
has
evidently
been
a grand
battlefield,
where
thousands
of
Giants
had
fallen.
*According
to
the
Winnebago
Indians
of
north
Wisconsin;
"Up
near
where
it
is
always
cold,
was a Tribe
of Giants known as
Wong-a-Rouskah-Podarouhuh-Poruh-Wah-Roughe-a-ga",
or "those who eat people and
have hearts of stone". They were so cruel
that it was said they even had ice in their stomachs.
When ever the Giants appeared among the
Winnebago's
some people would disappear,
never to return.
-
*According
to
the
legends
of
Indians
in
the
east;
the
early
Adena
Indian
Culture
had
Giant
Peoples (the
"Alleghans") who lived amongst them.
They were said to
have been descendants of an Giant Stock that migrated from Mexico many years
before the Adena
Culture began (before 1000 B.C.). Some say that the Adena Peoples themselves
were Descendants
of these Alleghan Peoples, and there
has
been
D.N.A.
evidence
that
proves
that
the
Adena
Indian
Tribes
were
not
Mongoloid
in
descent.
Other
skeletal
remains
have
shown
that
these
pre-Adena
Peoples
had
tall slender bodies, long-heads
with
narrow
skulls.
Were
these
the
same
peoples
as
the
Washitaw's?
- *Among the legends of the ancient Adena Indians and other tribes in the Ohio River Valley, there was a powerful tribe called "Ronnongwetowanca". They were Giants that had a considerable habitation. After a time, and having endured the outrages of these Giants. It is said that the people banded-together, and through the final force of about 800 warriors, successfully annihilated the abhorrent Ronnongwetowanca. After that, it was said that there were no Giants anywhere. This was supposed to have happened around 2,500 winters before Columbus discovered America, which was around 1000 B.C. - Many other Legends tell of these Giants also, such as the Atlantean legends that were passed-down to some of the Native American Indian Tribes. One legend states that the first sub-race of Atlantis was the "Rmoahals", a Nation of Giants. The Rmoahals were said to be a Dark Skinned Race. Their complexion being a sort of mahogany-black. Their height in the early days was about ten or twelve feet tall. Truly a Race of Giants. But through the centuries their stature gradually dwindled. The second sub-race before and after the destruction of Atlantis was the "Tlavatlis", said to be a Giant Statured Red-skinned Wandering Peoples. Physically they were said to be a tall powerful and hardy race of a red-brown color. But they were not quite so tall as the Rmoahals though. Many of them were said to have migrated to North America before the destruction of Atlantis.- |
Information
taken
from THE BLACK TRUTH
© Antonio
Mark
McCoy
Sr.
2003,
2004,
2005. - Abram-(Abraham)-He
was born in the City of UR. A Cushite/Ethiopian founded City that was founded
by
Nimrod,
a
Black
grandson
of
Ham.
So
Abraham
was probally
a
Black
Cushite
and/or
he
mingled
with them extensively. But more
than
likely
he
took
a
non-Cushite
wife,
who
gave
birth
to
his
son.
----| Isaac-He was born in Canaan, probably to a non-Cushite Mother "Sarah". Because in her time Harran, in Padden-Aram (spelled Haran in many English versions of the Bible), where she was from were possibly descendants of Ham, Shem, and Japheth. Even though it was located in the land of Aram. I explain why below. ----| Jacob-He was also born in Canaan, his mother Rebekah was the daughter of Bethuel, from Paddan-Aram. Which is in Syria, near Northern Iraq, and south of the Eastern Turkey border (south of the Black Hittites and Tubal). This was the land of Aram, the son of Shem, but it was also the land of the Black Babylonian descendants of Shem and Ham. ----| Judah-He was born from Leah, from the same land and "family" as Rebekah was from. So was his brothers; Reuben, Simeon, Levi, Issachar, and Zebulum. Then their brothers; Joseph and Benjamin were born to Leah's sister Rachel. She of course was from the same land also. But Judah also married a Black Wife "Tamar". |
Information
taken
from
The
Ancient
history
of
Mankind
on
Earth
©
Copyright
2003,
Antonio
Mark
McCoy
Sr. - Abram, because
he was
from UR. UR was a Black Babylonian City that
was founded by Nimrod, the Black Grandson of Ham, and the son of black
Cush. From there he went to Black Canaan where his Black son Isaac was
born.
From
there
Isaac's
Black
Son
Jacob
was
born.
He
later
became
Israel,
because
he
was
the
father
of
the
at
least
eight
Black
Sons
who
fathered
the
peoples
of
Israel
later.
From there Jacob's twelve Sons (the sons that started the Twelve Tribes of Israel) and their wives, 70 in all. Migrated from Black Canaan to Black Egypt. During their sojourn in Black Egypt the Children of future Israel mingled with the Black Egyptian's. Multiplying from being a family of only 70 people to a nation of over 3 million people. During that occupation in Egypt, they created the Hametic/Shemitic Twelve Tribes of Israel. But there was a small part of the Japhetic Tribe in the Blood-line, from Abraham's, Isaac's, and Jacob' Wives. Which made the skin complexion of the Israelites Black, Brown, Tan, and Olive-skinned Peoples, from mating with the Egyptian's over that long period of time. Like for example, how the Tribe of Joseph was. Joseph had a Black Egyptian Wife named "Asenath", who later gave birth to two Black Sons, named; "Manasseh and Ephraim". Who were the Ancestors of the Tribe of Joseph, numbering 85,200 at the time of the Exodus. Who were all descendant of Black, Brown, and possibly Tan Peoples. Egypt was exclusively a Black Nation of Peoples and did not change until after the Exodus in 1628 B.C. Then came the Exodus which took place in 1628 B.C. From there the future Black Israelites defeated the Black Canaanites in 1588 B.C. Then took-over the land of Israel. So at least eight Black, Brown, Tan, Olive, and Burnt Brass Tribes of Israel were established. Since it is a
fact
that the Biblical Egyptian's were a Black-Skinned People (and not these
phony "so-called" original Egyptian's today), Joseph
had to be Black-Skinned also. If he were White-Skinned, as 80-90% of
the
world's Jews (who are not the Original Jews) are today. His brothers
would
have recognized him easily among the Black-Skinned Egyptian's. Which
was
an all Black Country before the Hyksos invasion, that happened hundreds
of years after Joseph's time. They would have been very curious as to
why
a White-Skinned Hebrew were ruling in Egypt. But his brothers just
thought
that Joseph was another Egyptian, because he was just as "BLACK" as
they
were, and so were most of them.
|
THE
ARAB
SLAVE
TRADE: 18 million Africans transported during a 1,250 year period, from 650 - 1900 A.D. - Africa Egypt, Sudan, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Somalia, Mozambique, Western Sahara, Mauritania, Niger, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Kenya, Tanzania, Madagascar, Seychelles, Mauritius, & Comoros. - Asia Yemen, Oman, United Arab Emirates, Iran, Kuwait, Iraq, Jordan, Israel, Syria, Pakistan, & India. THE ATLANTIC SLAVE TRADE: 12 million Africans transported alive during a 438 year period, from 1450 - 1888 A.D. -- Europe Portugal, Britain, Spain, France, Denmark, & Holland. - Africa Nigeria, Democratic, Republic of Congo, Angola, Ghana, Republic of Congo, Cameroon, Senegal, Mozambique, Sierra Leone, Cote d’Ivoire, Benin, Togo, Madagascar, Guinea, Liberia, Guinea-Bissau, Gabon, Gambia, & Equatorial Guinea. - The America's Haiti, Dominican Republic, Cuba, Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago, Puerto Rico, The Bahamas, Barbados, Netherlads Antilles, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Virgin Islands, Grenada, Antigua and Barbuda, Bermuda, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands, Turks and Caicos Isalnds, Belize, Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Panama, Colombia, Venezuela, Guyana, Suriname, French Guiana, Brazil, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, Chile, Paraguay, Argentina, Uruguay, Mexico, & the United States of America. |
NOW AS I'LL QUOTE MYSELF FROM EARLIER. WHICH WILL EXPLAIN MY ABOVE MAP A LITTLE BETTER: - "First of all. My father's Great Ancestors were the "ORIGINAL NATIVE AMERICAN INDIAN (INDIAN meaning INDIGO, INDIA, and !BLACK) TRIBAL PEOPLES. Of the Blackfoot and the Cherokee Indians of; Virginia, the Carolina's, Tennessee, Kentucky, Alabama, and Georgia. I had discovered that "FACT" after I had prior discovered that "2 of the 13 Tribes of Israel". The Tribes of Benjamin and Judah. Ended up right here in the America's. Via Ships in King Solomon's times." - "The Early Tsonga-Shangaan who were known as "TRADERS" and "SAILORS"." - "The Tsonga-Shangaan and the Venda who claim how they came from Israel to Africa in King Solomon's times (1057 to 1017 B.C.), as his Traders." - "The Peoples of Tanzania (who are the same as the Tsonga-Shangaan and the Venda), the "Venda" (to include the Lembe)." - "The Venda who were later joined by the Famed Lembe Tribe in South Africa. The Lembe Tribe from Israel who were Late-Comers to South Africa. They who had fled Northern Israel after the 797 B.C. Assyrian Invasions of Northern Israel then. Them going to Yemen then, the Land of Sheba. From there to Southern Africa and Zimbabwe. - "The Yuchi who were the same as the Euchee (an African Origin name) and the Uche (a Nigerian Origin name)." - "Cherokee or Yutsi (an African Origin name, same as the Tutsi, Tussi, Batusi, Watusi, and the Watutsi)." - "The Yuchi Indians had migrated to the area of Florida and Georgia from the region of the Bahamas. According to their legends, the Island sank beneath the Sea and they fled for their lives. These same Yuchis later migrated to the Oklahoma territory, where they eventually settled down. They who have identical customs and festivals as the Ancient Hebrew Israelites did. Those which date back to the time of Moses and the Exodus from ancient Egypt (Leviticus 23)." I WHO'LL NOW FINISH THIS BY SAYING: - THE "LGBO/IGBO/IBO" NIGERIAN TRIBE IS SWORN TO BE FROM ISRAEL. THEIR CUSTOMS BEING ANCIENT HEBREW ALSO. LIKE MANY OF THE OTHER AFRICAN TRIBES OF MY ORIGIN I HAD ALREADY SPOKEN OF EARLIER. THE IGBOS CLAIMING TO BE THE "CHOSEN TRIBE" IN THE WHOLE OF NIGERIA. ONE OF THE MOST POPULAR VERSIONS OF THE MIGRATORY STORIES OF ORIGIN OF THE IGBO PEOPLE OR TRIBE. IS THE ONE THAT POINTS TO ISRAEL. THIS ASSUMPTION IS BASED ON THE SO-CALLED SIMILARITIES BETWEEN THE CULTURES OF THE IGBO AND THE ANCIENT HEBREWS. SOME IGBO SCHOLARS CONSIDER THEMSELVES AS OFF-SHOOTS OF THE LOST TRIBES OF THE HEBREWS WHO MIGRATED SOUTHWARD FROM ISRAEL TO NORTHERN AFRICA. THEN TO NIGERIA FROM THERE. -
-
NOW THE WORD "UCHE" ORIGINATED FROM THE IGBO TRIBE IN NIGERIA. FROM THAT WORD WE GET THE WORDS; UCHI, UCHEE, EUCHEE, OOCHEE, AND YUCHI. THOSE BEING ALL OF THE TRIBAL NAMES OF THE "YUCHI" TRIBE THAT ORIGINATED IN THE "BAHAMAS". THE NAMES MEANING "FAR AWAY". MEANING HOW THEY WERE PEOPLES "FAR AWAY" FROM THEIR ORIGINAL HOMELAND. !THAT HOME LAND WHICH WAS IN AFRICA. AS THEY HAD STATED OF THEIR ORIGIN. THEY OF WHO AS I'VE ALREADY SAID. LIVED UPON THE BIMINI ISLAND UNTIL IT'S MAIN MASS SANK LONG AGO. BETWEEN 5,590 TO 3,680 B.C. IT HAD GRADUALLY SANK. - IN THE JUNE 1981 EDITION OF MARINE GEOLOGY. IT GIVES RADIOCARBON DATES FOR MANGROVE PEAT IN THIS AREA. BASED ON THE ESTIMATE OF THE SCIENTIST; BROECKER AND KULP. THEM LISTING DATES BETWEEN 5,590 AND 3,680 B.C. FOR THE GRADUAL SINKING OF THE FLORIDA BIMINI ISLAND REGION. !SO. ACCORDING TO THOSE "SCIENTIFIC". ESTIMATES. THE YUCHI TRIBE LEFT THE ISLAND BETWEEN THOSE TIMES. !WELL. MOST OF THEM DID THEN ANYWAYS. AND THEY "ARE NOT" DESCENDANTS OF AFRICAN "SLAVES" THAT WERE BROUGHT THERE MANY MANY THOUSANDS OF YEARS LATER. AS MOST !RACIST WHITE HISTORIAN'S HAVE STATED. MOST !RACIST WHITE HISTORIAN'S WHO HAVE ALSO STATED HOW THE BAHAMAN ARCHIPELAGO WAS "UNOCCUPIED" BEFORE THE "LUCAYAN" INDIANS ARRIVED IN BETWEEN 600 TO 700 A.D. THEY'RE "CRAZY", AND THEY'RE "RACIST". !THEY OF WHO'LL SAY "ANYTHING" IN ORDER TO "DISCREDIT" ANY "BLACK" FOUNDATIONS AND/OR ACCOMPLISHMENTS. - OTHER WHITE SCIENTIST AND WHITE HISTORIANS WHO HAVE STATED THAT THE GREATER ANTILLES AS A WHOLE WERE UNOCCUPIED BEFORE 6000 TO 5000 B.C. AND THAT THE GREAT BAHAMA BANK ON WHICH THE BIMINI ISLANDS ARE SITUATED ON HAD DISAPPEARED BETWEEN 6000-3000 B.C. THIS WHICH WAS CAUSED BY THE RISE IN SEA LEVEL AFTER THE LAST ICE AGE. SCIENTIST HAVE STATED. AND !THAT MAKES SENSE. THE SINKING OF THE ISLAND, AFTER THE ICE AGE DOES. BUT NO ONE INHABITING THE ISLANDS BEFORE THAT TIME. IS PURE "RACIST" "BULL SHIT" THOUGH. THE SINKING OF THE ISLAND BEING THE TIME THE YUCHI TRIBE LEFT THE ISLAND. AS THEY HAVE STATED IN THEIR ORAL HISTORY. THE ORIGINAL ISLAND INHABITANTS OF THE BIMINI ISLANDS AFTER "ATLANTIS". WHICH WERE THE "YUCHI". FROM THERE THEY SAY HOW THEY MIGRATED TO WHAT IS NOW; FLORIDA, ALABAMA, GEORGIA, TENNESSEE, AND THEN ONTO OKLAHOMA. AND AS I SAID EARLIER. - THE YUCHI THEMSELVES WHO HAVE ALSO STATED THAT ONLY THE "ALGONKIAN (LENAPE)" INDIAN TRIBE WERE ALREADY HERE IN THE AMERICA'S WHEN THEY CAME. THE YUCHI WHO CALLED THE ALGONKIAN THE "OLD ONES". AND !THAT BEING A !FACT. THEY OF WHOM WERE INDEED IN THE AREA LONG BEFORE ANY "SLAVE TRADES". BOTH THE ALGONKIAN AND THE YUCHI WERE. AND !THAT TOO BEING A WELL DOCUMENTED !FACT. IT IS CERTAIN THAT THE YUCHI WERE AMONG THE "ADENA" MOUND-BUILDING PEOPLE. AND THEREFORE AMONG THE OLDEST RECOGNIZABLE PERMANENT RESIDENTS OF THE SOUTHEAST UNITED STATES. THEM BEING "NATIVE AMERICAN'S". - NOW REMEMBER THAT DR. JOSEPH MAHAN HAD UNCOVERED POTTERY FROM THE WATERS AROUND THE BAHAMAS. WHICH TOLD OF INDIAN LEGENDS. STATING HOW THE YUCHI INDIANS HAD MIGRATED TO THE AREA OF FLORIDA AND GEORGIA FROM THE REGION OF THE BAHAMAS. ACCORDING TO THEIR LEGENDS, THE ISLAND SANK BENEATH THE SEA AND THEY FLED FOR THEIR LIVES THEN. THESE SAME YUCHI LATER MIGRATED TO THE OKLAHOMA TERRITORY, WHERE THEY EVENTUALLY SETTLED DOWN THERE. THEY WHO HAVE IDENTICAL CUSTOMS AND FESTIVALS AS THE ANCIENT HEBREW ISRAELITES DID. THOSE WHICH DATE BACK TO THE TIME OF MOSES AND THE EXODUS FROM ANCIENT EGYPT (LEVITICUS 23). - NOW ALSO REMEMBER THAT DR. BARRY FELL HAD PRESENTED A STELE THAT WAS UNEARTHED IN OKLAHOMA THAT HAD REFERENCE TO THE PHOENICIAN AND EGYPTIAN GODS OF BAAL AND RA. IT WHICH HAD INSCRIPTIONS THAT DATED BACK TO THE THIRTEENTH CENTURY B.C. AND THERE WERE ALSO ANCIENT PHOENICIAN SCRIPTS FOUND IN; TENNESSEE, ALABAMA, AND GEORGIA. - THE YUCHI THAT WERE A "BLACK" INDIAN TRIBE. OR AN AFRICAN DESCENDANT INDIAN TRIBE. THEY TOO WHO HAD !STRONG !STRONG HEBREW TRAITS AND CUSTOMS. BECAUSE THEY WERE PEOPLES FROM THE NIGERIAN IGBO TRIBE WHO OBVIOUSLY SAILED HERE TO NORTH AMERICA THOUSANDS OF YEARS AGO. I SAY "THOUSANDS OF YEARS AGO" BECAUSE THEY HAD CLAIMED HOW THEY ONCE LIVED UPON THE BIMINI ISLAND OFF THE COAST OF FLORIDA IN THE BAHAMAS. BEFORE IT SANK. THAT PARTICULAR SINKING THAT HAD OCCURRED THOUSANDS OF YEARS AGO. AND MY D.N.A. RESULTS THAT CONFIRM THEIR STORY. I MEAN HOW ELSE CAN I HAVE D.N.A. THAT GOES BACK THOUSANDS OF YEARS TO THAT TIME. IN ALL THE PLACES THEY SAID THEY WERE? MY D.N.A. EVIDENCE RESULTS SHOW THAT I HAVE STRONG D.N.A. WITH BOTH IN NIGERIA .73%. IN THE BAHAMAS .87%. AND IN NORTH AMERICA IN THE OKLAHOMA REGION .83% - .88%. THESE BEING MY PEOPLES. MY ANCESTORS. - THERE ALSO BEING THE "MUSKOGEAN" TRIBE WHO WERE SAID TO BE THE "YUTCU' LKE". MEANING THAT THEY WERE "YUCHI LIKE". BUT WERE NOT EXACTLY THE YUCHI TRIBE THOUGH. BUT A SEPARATE TRIBE ALSO FROM AFRICA THEY WERE. AND A PEOPLES "FAR AWAY" FROM THEIR HOMELAND. MAKING THEM "YUCHI LIKE". THEM BEING ALSO CALLED THE "YUTSI OR THE YUTSIS". A SIMILAR YUCHI NAME. THE WORD YUTSI BEING ALSO AN AFRICAN ORIGINATED WORD. ONE THAT WAS TAKEN FROM THE WORD "WATUSI". THE YUTSI BEING DESCENDANTS OF A WATUSI PEOPLES. THE WATUSI WHO WERE ALSO NAMED THE; TUTSI, ABATUTSI, BATUSI, TUSSI, AND THE WATUTSI. SOME FORM OF YATUSI PEOPLES WHO OBVIOUSLY SAILED TO THE AMERICA'S AND ESTABLISHING THAT TRIBE. THEY OF WHICH WERE SAID TO BE A "TALL STATURE" INDIAN TRIBE. SO IT WAS SAID ABOUT THEM THOUSANDS OF YEARS AGO. !TODAY. THEM OF COURSE NOT BEING THE SAME "TALLISH" PEOPLES. !OF COURSE NOT. THEM ALL. BOTH OF THESE MYSTERIOUS TRIBES. THAT ARE MORE "DILUTED" WITH MANY MANY OTHER RACES. !BUT. THE D.N.A. TO IDENTIFY THE TRIBE STILL EXISTS TODAY. !OF COURSE. IT WHICH GOES BACK THOUSANDS OF YEARS. IT BEING MY D.N.A. ALSO. - IT ALSO BEING A "FACT" TODAY THAT "CANAANITES" WERE IN THE AMERICA'S THOUSANDS OF YEARS AGO. THE WATUSI WHO WERE INDEED DESCENDANTS OF THE CANAANITES THAT HAD FLED ISRAEL DURING THE WAR AGAINST THE HEBREW'S. THE IGBO AND THE WATUSI TRIBES FROM AFRICA BEING CONTRIBUTORS TO THE "MOST COMPLEXED" NATIVE AMERICAN TRIBES HERE IN NORTH AMERICA. AND MY D.N.A. PROVES "EXACTLY" THAT. THERE WERE !MANY !MANY "BLACK" ORIGINS OF THE ANCIENT NORTH AMERICAN INDIAN TRIBES.
- !BACK TO MY FAMILY. AND MY "BLACK" ANCESTRY HERE IN THE UNITED STATES. HERE IN THE AMERICA'S. BEING ORIGINATED FROM .98% ARABIAN D.N.A. !WE OF WHOM ARE FROM THE "ORIGINAL" SHEBAN TRIBE. !WE OF WHOM ARE "STILL" EXISTING HERE IN NORTH AMERICA. WHICH IS VERY VERY OBVIOUS. WE OF WHOM ARE ALSO FROM THE ISRAELI TRIBES OF BENJAMIN AND JUDAH. DUE TO THE MATING BETWEEN THE SHEBAN TRIBES AND THE ISRAELI TRIBES THEN. AND !BEFORE AND AFTER KING SOLOMON AND THE QUEEN OF SHEBA'S UNION. THE ISRAELI'S AND THE SHEBAN'S THAT WERE ALLIES THEN. AND BOTH BEING "ARABIAN TRIBES" OF PEOPLES THEN, AS NOW. BECAUSE "ISRAEL" IS ON THE "ARABIAN PENINSULA". IF YOU HAVEN'T NOTICED. AS IT WAS BACK IN THOSE TIMES. AND MY "ARABIAN" D.N.A. IS NOT JUST SHEBAN. BUT ALSO ISRAELI. !ISRAEL THAT WAS OCCUPIED BY THE SAME "BLACK" TRIBES OF CUSH OR SEBA THEN. THE SON OF "CUSH" THAT HAD GIVEN-RISE TO THE SHEBANS AND THE FIRST PEOPLES OF ISRAEL, WHO WERE FROM UR. SEE MY MAP AND DIAGRAM FURTHER BELOW. - THE SON OF CUSH WHO WAS FROM "HAM". JUST LIKE HIS BROTHER "CANAAN" WAS. CANAAN WHO GAVE-RISE TO "SIDOM". THEN SIDOM TO THE "PHOENICIANS". AND THEREFORE THE PHOENICIANS WERE A "BLACK" PEOPLES. YET THERE ARE THOSE WHO ARE CLAIMING THEM TO BE A "WHITE" PEOPLES? NOW HOW CAN THAT FRACKING BE? THE TRIBES OF HAM BEING "BLACK PEOPLES". AND IN NO WAY "WHITE PEOPLES". THE PHOENICIANS BEING BLACK PEOPLES LIKE THEIR SIDOMITE ANCESTORS BEFORE THEM. AS SHOWN BELOW WITH THE EARLY AND THE ORIGINAL PHOENICIAN BUST. THE ONE HERE THAT "WHITE" HISTORIANS ATTEMPTED TO MAKE "NOT" LOOK "BLACK". BY CHISELING-OFF THE BROAD-BASED "BLACK NOSE". NOW JUST HOW OBVIOUS IS !THAT SHIT FOR YOU? |
ATDNA (AUTOSOMAL D.N.A.) | |
PRECENTAGES OF MY ATD.N.A. SHARED: | PRECENTAGES
OF MY GLOBAL
GENETIC MATCH ATD.N.A.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold
Reserves
Global
Ranking: |
Total
Tons
of
Gold: |
United States | 8,133.50 |
Germany | 3,401.00 |
Italy | 2,451.80 |
France | 2,435.40 |
China | 1,054.10 |
Switzerland | 1,040.10 |
Qatar | 950.30 |
Russia | 775.20 |
Japan | 765.20 |
Netherlands | 615.50 |
India | 614.80 |
Republic of Taiwan |
466.90 |
Portugal | 421.60 |
Venezuela | 401.10 |
Saudi Arabia | 322.90 |
Iran | 320.00 |
United Kingdom | 310.30 |
Lebanon | 300.00 |
Spain | 281.60 |
Austria | 280.00 |
Belgium | 227.50 |
Pakistan | 184.40 |
Philippines | 175.90 |
Algeria | 173.60 |
Libya | 143.80 |
Singapore | 127.40 |
Sweden | 125.70 |
South Africa | 124.90 |
Turkey | 116.10 |
Greece | 111.70 |
Romania | 103.70 |
Poland | 102.90 |
Mexico | 100.10 |
Thailand | 99.50 |
Australia | 79.90 |
Kuwait | 79.00 |
Egypt | 75.60 |
Indonesia | 73.10 |
Kazakhstan | 67.30 |
Denmark | 66.50 |
Argentina | 54.70 |
Finland | 49.10 |
Bulgaria | 39.90 |
Malaysia | 36.40 |
Peru | 34.70 |
Belarus | 32.00 |
Brazil | 33.60 |
Slovakia | 31.80 |
Bolivia | 28.30 |
Ukraine | 27.20 |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warlpiri
-The Warlpiri are a group of Indigenous Australians, many of whom speak the Warlpiri language. There are 5,000–6,000 Warlpiri, living mostly in a few towns and settlements scattered through their traditional land in Australia's Northern Territory, north and west of Alice Springs. Their largest community is at Yuendumu and many live also at Willowra, Lajamanu, Nyirrpi, Mount Allen and smaller settlements. Many also live in Alice Springs and Tennant Creek. About 3,000 still speak the Warlpiri language. The word "Warlpiri" has also been romanised as Walpiri, Walbiri, Elpira, Ilpara and Wailbri. http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/ruins-of-ancient-city-discovered-in-australian-desert/
Alice Springs| A team of archaeologists working for the Australian National University, who were proceeding to an excavation near the sandstone rock formation of Uluru, has unearthed the ruins of a large precolonial city dating back to more than 1500 years ago. The important number of tombs and artefacts already discovered on the site suggests that it could have been the capital of an ancient empire, completely unknown to historians until now. |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Columbia_gold_rushes The presence of gold in what is now British Columbia is spoken of in many old legends that, in part, led to its discovery. The Strait of Anian, claimed to have been sailed by Juan de Fuca for whom today's Strait of Juan de Fuca is named, was described as passing through a land (Anian) "rich in gold, silver, pearls and fur". Bergi (meaning "mountains"), another legendary land near Anian, was also said to be rich in gold as well. Speculative maps of northwestern North America published before the area was mapped placed the legendary golden cities of Quivira and Cibola in the far inland northwest. No Spanish exploration parties in search of El Dorado, "the golden one" a reference to the legendary king of a lost golden city, are known to have ever reached British Columbia, although archaeological remains point to a brief Spanish presence in the Okanagan and Similkameen regions of the province's Southern Interior. The Muchalaht, the Nuu-chah-nulth group in the area of the community of Gold River, on Vancouver Island, which is a community at the end of a fjord that drains the west coast of Vancouver Island, tell a story of Spanish arriving then burning the valley searching for gold. Prospectors searching the valley have found old crude dug adits on the pass of the White River Valley and the Gold River Valley. |
THE BLACK TRUTH
By Antonio Mark McCoy Sr. © Antonio Mark McCoy Sr. 2003, 2004, 2005. Sakanouye no Tamuramaro: Sakanouye no Tamuramaro-Japan's First "Shogun" - The Prehistoric and
Proto-historic
Populations of Japan were Africoid Types (just like they were
everywhere
else in the world). And were in Japan, anthropologically described as "Aoshima".
The Aoshima appear to be the Ancestors of the early Ainu also. Ainu
traditions
tell of "Race of Black Dwarfs" or "Koropokguru"
which inhabited Japan before the coming of the Ainu. Another Ancient
Japanese
Tradition points to the conquest of Japan from the southeast by a Race
of Warriors of Black or near Black Complexion. Who were the same "African
Pygmie Peoples" who left Africa around 100,000 years B.C. Then
later
navigated the entire Globe. Becoming later the; "Grimaldi",
"Atis", "Mani",
"Semang", "Andamanese",
"Nicobari", and "Wadasa".
Some
Japanese
Scholars
say
these
were
the
Ancestors
of
"Tamuramaro".
The
very
first
Shogun of
Japan.
Who
was
a
Black
Complected
Man
by
the
full
name
of
"Sakanouye
no
Tamuramaro" He was a Warrior
symbolized
in Japanese history as "a paragon of military virtues". Tamuramaro
founded a
Shrine in the
District
of Izawa in Mutsu. Dedicated to Hachiman in which he hung up his Bows
and
Arrows. Tamuramaro was the First Warrior Statesmen of Japan. In later
ages
he was revered by Military Men as a Model Commander and as the first
recipient
of the title Shogun. There is even a Japanese proverb "for a Samurai to
be brave he must have a bit of Black Blood". A Samurai is a "KNIGHT".
And
Knighthood throught the world was created by Black Peoples.
|
The Ancient Chinese Scholar "Sima Qian" wrote in the "Records of the Grand Historian". That the Last Emperor of the Xia Dynasty. He of whom ruled sometime around 1600 B.C.. Was himself an Xiongnu Man. |
I
tell
you
once
again
to
put
your
American
racialist
views
aside
when
studying
Central
Asian
history.
You
can't
divide
central
asians
into
"Black,
white,
asian,
and
Hispanic"
categories
like
in
the
U.S.
because
it
doesn't
make
any
sense.
Turkic,
Mongolic,
and
Iranic
are
cultura-linguistic
identities;
and
one
can
be
Turkic
being
of
Mongoloid,
Europoid,
or
mixed
phenotype.
Owing
to
their
exogamic
traditions,
most
steppe
peoples
are
genetically
very
mixed.
What
defines
them
is
the
language
and
tribal
alliance. - There is a good possibility that the Xiongnu were diverse at that time, that could also be the reason why so many ethnicities claim them as their ancestors. - According to Chinese sources, conventional theory defines 「匈奴� empire as a confederation of nomadic tribes of various ethnic backgrounds with different spoken languages. |
Information taken from my "ATLANTIS"
E-book. © Copyright 2003, 2004,
2005, Antonio Mark McCoy Sr.
-- - THE PRE-HISPANIC PYRAMID BUILDERS: Thoth was the God of Wisdom. And he directed the building of the "FIRST" Pyramid Complex at Teotihuacan. As legend states that the builders of the Great City were Atlantean God-Kings who fled the destruction of Atlantis. But I have already shown you geometric alignments that connect Teotihuacan with Giza, Egypt. As the God Thoth was a ruler in both Pyramid Civilizations. As he was known as; Thoth to the Atlantean's and the Egyptian's. Kukulcan to the Mexican, Central American, and South American's. But also Quetzalcoatl. Then Ea (Enik) in Ancient Babylon. Which they were incorrect about though because he was the son of Ea. Not Ea himself. He was also called God Tehuti in Ancient Atlantis. So it is Thoth who taught Mankind the Pyramid Building knowledge. Thoth who was known as a Reptilian-Bird, Shape-shifting Man. Appearing as a Black Man to the Ancient Egyptian's. Then a Shape-shifting Bird-Reptilian White or Pale-Man to the Mayan's. As the three pieces of artwork display him below here: I discovered
exactly
"what" Thoth was in another of my E-Books.
And who exactly he is, and where he is from. As he is very very
ancient,
and a Son of a much higher God. !Satan. Which does not necessarily make
him evil like Satan is. Which I had so revealed in my "Children of
the
God's" E-Book. The Brown Mayan and the Black Egyptian's knew of
Thoth
very well. As he was the Instructor of the building of the two greatest
Pyramid Complexes on Earth. Which use to be three, before Atlantis had
sank.
- He directed the Olmec's before the Mayan's. As the Olmec's built the Pyramids at; Alton Ha, Calakmul, Caracol, Palenque, Tikal, Uxmal, Monte Alban, Tenochtitlán, and many other locations. The Olmec's built these Pyramid Complexes, but others got credit for their construction. Which is incorrect. Since others like the Toltec's, the Mayan's, and the Aztec's, mererly inherited the Olmec's Pyramid Complexes, after they were built. Then built-over them in their own Pyramidial style. Later the Olmec's Mayan Descendants re-built (or built-over or upon) many of these great Pyramid Locations. And "that" is the model of Pyramid building. To re-build over older structures. Just like we today remodel our own buildings. Or merely tear them down, then rebuild them later in the exact same locations. As it was proven at Teotihuacan. Now all the Scientist who are dating these Great Pyramid Sites, are doing it all wrong. And should be looking to date the much older structures that are within or underneath the newer ones.
Instead they are doing it backwards. It was proven at the Giza Pyramid Complex as well. As it was previously believed the site was just some 4000 years olds. When in reality it was at least 12500 years old. So the Teotihuacan Site could be the same age? But is probably more near the 11000 year age. Now everyone in the Archaeological Community debates to exactly who built the Teotihuacan Site. Debate no more, because it was Thoth. Then the Cholula Pyramid Site was built by another Fleeing Atlantean, the Giant Xelhua. As legend states. After the building of those two much older Pyramid Complexes, the Olmec's had built theirs, according to Thoth's plan. Then later the Toltec's built a few, at Tula and at Chichen Itza. As Chichen Itza was a joint Toltec Mayan Pyramid Site. The Mayan's built Xochicalo alone though. And there are many others. As Mexico and Central America is littered with Pyramids. As no other place on the Earth has as many Pyramid Sites. !No place. Not China nor Egypt or the Sudan. All of these
legends
and accounts are very real. As real as the Great
Pyramid Complexes that are still standing today. !That real. As they
were
built in; AUSTRALIA, BELIZE, BOLIVIA, BRAZIL, CHINA, TIBET, ECUADOR,
EGYPT,
EL SALVADOR, JAPAN, INDONESIA, PERU, CANARY ISLANDS, SUDAN,
TAHITI, NORTH AMERICA, IRAQ, and other places. In different styles,
from
Ziggurats to Dirt Mounds. To Solid Limestone, Sandstone, and Granite.
All
of which though, represented the same thing. Ancient wisdom that is now
lost to us today.
|
A !GREAT !GREAT DEAL OF
THE HEBREW ISRAELITE'S IN ISRAEL. DURING AND AFTER
EXODUS. WERE EGYPTIAN-HEBREWS. AND WHAT'S NOT TALKED ABOUT BY THE
SO-CALLED EGYPT HISTORIAN'S. OR THEY SIMPLY JUST DON'T KNOW ANY OF
THIS? THAT
EGYPT WAS TIED TO ISRAEL EVEN AFTER THE EXODUS. VIA "KINSHIP". THEN
AFTER THE HYSKOS WERE COMPLETELY DRIVEN OUT OF EGYPT BY PHARAOH "AHMOSE".
BETWEEN
1549/50
TO
1524/25
B.C. THE EGYPTIAN-HEBREW
ISRAELITE ANCESTRAL CONNECTION WAS "RENEWED" THEN. THEN IT WAS LATER.
THE EGYPTIAN PHARAOH "THUTMOSE III" (FROM 1479 TO 1424 B.C.).
HAD
"TAKEN-CONTROL" AND/OR HAD "CONQUERED" ALL OF WESTERN AND SOUTHERN
ISRAEL IN
1475 B.C. !THAT OF WHICH WAS POSSIBLY "NOT" A "CONQUEST" THEN THOUGH?
AND WAS MORE
THAN LIKELY A "UNION" INSTEAD? BECAUSE AN "EGYPTIAN" CONQUEST OF ISRAEL
IS "NEVER" SPOKEN OF IN THE BIBLE, FOR THAT TIME. BUT THE INVASION AND
CONQUEST OF SOUTHERN "CANAAN" BY THE EGYPTIAN'S IS THOUGH.
!BUT. THERE WAS NO "SOUTHERN CANAAN" THEN THOUGH. IT BEING THE TRIBE OF JUDAH IN THOSE TIMES THEN. !OR THE LAND THAT IS "SOUTHERN ISRAEL" TODAY. WASN'T PART OF THE TRIBE OF "JUDAH" THEN? AND "WAS" STILL CONSIDERED "SOUTHERN CANAAN" THEN? AND ACCORDING TO THE HISTORY IN "BIBLICAL JUDGES". IT "WASN'T" THE LAND OF "ISRAEL" AS OF YET. AND IT WAS "STILL" CONSIDERED TO BE "SOUTHERN CANAAN" THEN. A LAND THAT WAS ALSO CALLED "AMALEC" THEN. UP UNTIL THE TIME THE PHARAOH "THUTMOSE III" CONQUESTED IT IN 1475 B.C. THEN LATER THE PHARAOH "MERNEPTAH" (1213 - 1203 B.C.) HAD WENT TO WAR AGAINST "ISRAELIS, AND HAD LATER "DEFEATED" THEM. "WIPING THOSE PARTICULAR ISRAELITE PEOPLES OUT IN "CANAAN" (THE WILDERNESS OF ZIN). ACCORDING TO THE "MERNEPTAH STELE". IN ISRAELI-EGYPTIAN HISTORY. WESTERN ISRAEL IS "OCCUPIED" BY THE EGYPTIAN'S A NUMBER OF TIMES. BY PHARAOH SETI I (1290 TO 1279 B.C.) AND BY PHARAOH RAMESSES II (1279 TO 1213 B.C.). !BUT IN THOSE TIMES. IT BEING THE "EGYPTIAN'S" COMING TO THE "AID" OF "ISRAEL" THEN. TO PROTECT THEM FROM THE "HITTITES" IN THE NORTH THEN. VIA "ALLIANCES" MOSTLY THEN. THE PHARAOH RAMESSES II GOING TO "WAR" AGAINST THE HITTIES IN HIS TIME THOUGH. IN 1274 B.C. THOSE PARTICULAR "HITTIES" BEING OF MIXED-RACE ANCESTRY. THEM BEING OF "AFRICAN", "ASIAN", "EUROPEAN", AND "MIDDLE EASTERN" ANCESTRY. !THEM BEING THOUGH. MOSTLY OF THE "INDO-EUROPEAN" DESCENDANT I MIGHT ADD HERE. THEY OF WHOM WERE MOSTLY "KNOCKED-FROM-POWER" BY THE "ASSYRIAN'S" THEN-AFTER THOUGH. THE EARLY ASSYRIAN'S
WHOM WERE A MIXTURE OF "BLACK AKKADIAN'S" AND
"SHEMITES" (NOT SEMITES). THE GREAT ASSYRIAN-AKKADIAN KING "SARGON THE
GREAT (2334 TO
2279 B.C.) WHO "ROSE" THEM INTO POWER THEN. THE ASSYRIAN'S WE ALL KNOW
WHO WENT ON TO INVADE NORTHERN AND EASTERN ISRAEL IN 762 B.C. THE
ASSYRIAN'S WHO "ROSE" TO POWER VIA THE LEADERSHIP OF THE "AKKADIAN"
KING SARGON. THE AKKADIAN'S (WHO WERE LOCATED JUST NORTH OF
SUMER) OF WHO TOOK POWER IN THE LAND OF BABYLON. AND THEN HAD
"INVADED" WHAT WAS LEFT OF "SUMERIA" ALSO THEN. THEN IT BEING THE
"CHALDEAN BABYLONIAN'S" WHO WEAKENED THE ASSYRIAN KINGDOM THEN-AFTER.
AND HAD
EVENTUALLY DEFEATED ASSYRIA BETWEEN 612 TO 608 B.C. VIA THE AID AND
ALLIANCES OF; MEDIANS (ANCIENT IRANIAN'S), OTHER PERSIANS (ANCIENT IRANIAN'S), SCYTHIAN'S,
AND CIMMERIANS. BEFORE THAT. THE CHALDEAN BABYLONIAN'S HAD
INVADED THE SOUTHERN TRIBES OF ISRAEL.
I MUST ALSO NOTE. THAT THOSE PARTICULAR "CHALDEAN BABYLONIAN'S" WHO HAD ONLY "TAKEN" THE ISRAELITE'S WHO WERE; PROFESSIONALS, WEALTHY, AND SKILLED CRAFTSMEN. THE BABYLONIAN'S LEAVING THE SO-CALLED ORDINARY ISRAELITE PEOPLE TO REMAIN IN JUDAH THEN. AND "THAT" EXACTLY SHOWING YOU THE "INTELLIGENCE" AND THE "CREATIVENESS" THE ANCIENT "BLACK HAMITIC AND SHEMITIC ISRAELITES" HAD THEN. WHICH IS "EXACTLY" WHO THEY WERE THEN. !THEY OF WHOM WHO HAD "INTELLIGENCE" AND THE "CREATIVENESS" OVER THE INVADING CHALDEAN BABYLONIAN PEOPLES THEN. CHALDEAN BABYLONIAN PEOPLES THEMSELVES WHO WERE OF "INDO-EUROPEAN" STOCK MOSTLY. PROVING THAT ANCIENT ISRAEL WAS VERY "INTELLIGENT" AND "GIFTED". AND IT ALSO BEING OF MOSTLY "BLACK HAMITIC AND SHEMITIC" STOCKS THEN. AND "THOSE" OF WHOM WERE THE PEOPLES OF ISRAEL. THEM ALSO BEING "BLACK" EGYPTIAN'S IN DESCENDANT. AND THEY "WERE NOT" OF; MEDIAN, PERSIAN, SCYTHIAN, CIMMERIAN, AND/OR OF CHALDEAN BABYLONIAN'S STOCK. MEANING THEY "WERE NOT" OF ANY "INDO-EUROPEAN" STOCK. AND THOSE "NOT" IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM. BEING THE ANCIENT ISRAELITE PEOPLES THEN. "INDO-EUROPEAN" WHITE PEOPLES WEREN'T. AND THIS "PROVES" IT "EXACTLY". AND "WHITE" HISTORIAN'S HAVE ATTEMPTED TO "CHANGE" THE ISRAELI TIME LINE. IN ORDER TO "HIDE" !THIS. THE TRUE IDENTITY OF THESE THE "BLACK HAMITIC AND SHEMITIC ISRAELITES" OF THAT TIME. AND THE EGYPTIAN-ISRAELI ANCESTRAL CONNECTIONS. THAT HAD OCCURRED AFTER THE EXODUS. AND TO ULTIMATELY "HIDE" THE LASTING CONNECTION THE HEBREW-ISRAELITES HAD WITH THEIR "BLACK" EGYPTIAN COUSINS. |
THOSE
PEOPLES THEN OF WHO WERE JAPHETHIAN DESCENDANTS. AND WERE ORIGINALLY
(BEFORE THEIR MIGRATION INTO BABYLON) "INDO
SCYTHIAN'S" THEN. THEY OF WHOM MIGRATED "EAST". AND NOT "WEST". !FALSE
GERMAN HISTORIAN'S TODAY. AS WELL IN "ADOLPH HITLERS" TIMES. WHO HAD
PURPOSELY LEAD THE WORLD TO BELIEVE THAT THE GERMANIC PEOPLES WERE OF
"ARYAN" DESCENDANCY. WHEN IN REALITY. THEY "WERE !NOT". AND ARE INSTEAD
THE COUSINS OF THE EUROPEAN JEWS IN ISRAEL TODAY. AND ARE "ASHKENAZ". AND THE
JEWS BEING "ASHKENAZI".
BOTH BEING FROM THE JAPHETHIC TRIBES OF
"ASHCHENAZ" AND "TOGARMAH".
AND HERE NOW BEING THE "SHOCKER". THE
GERMAN PEOPLES DON'T HAVE A GOD DAMN CLUE OF ANY OF THIS. AND NEITHER
ARE THEY VAGUELY AWARE OF ANY OF THIS:
-- HITLER HIMSELF BEING FROM THE POWERFUL ROYAL ROTHSCHILD "JEWISH" ILLUMINATI FAMILY. THEY WHO ORCHESTRATED THE ENTIRE WAR THEN. FOR PROFIT AND FOR GLOBAL !POWER. HITLER WHO WAS REALLY A "JEW". AND THE ROTHSCHILD BEING EUROPEAN JEWS ALSO. AND THE NAZI HOLOCAUST WAS ALL "RIGGED". WITH "ADOLPH HITLER" BEING "FOOLED" INTO EXTERMINATING THE "FALSE" JEWS IN EUROPE. SO THAT LATER. THE WORLD WOULD FEEL SYMPATHY FOR THOSE "FALSE ASS JEWS". THEN THEY CAN "STEAL-AWAY" ALL OF THE COUNTRY OF ISRAEL FROM THE ARABS LATER. WHICH THEY HAD DONE AFTER THE WAR. IN "MASS". AFTER THE UNITED STATES AND ENGLAND. HAD "GIVEN" THE COUNTRY OF ISRAEL TO THEM THEN. THAT WHICH WAS ALL A "RUSE" TO STEAL ISRAEL. ORCHESTRATED BY THE "ILLUMINATI". SO THAT THOSE FALSE JEW BASTARDS COULD CLAIM THEMSELVES TO BE THE PEOPLES OF GOD. WHEN THEY'RE NOT. AND GODS TRUE PEOPLES ARE "US". WE WHO ARE THE ORIGINAL "BLACK" HEBREW ISRAELITES. WE WHO WERE "NEVER" CALLED "JEWS". AND THE WORD JEW WAS A WORD THOUGHT OF BEFORE THE TIMES OF JESUS. TAKEN FROM THE NAME "JUDAH" (THE TRIBE OF JUDAH). AS THE PLAN WAS DEVELOPED WAY BACK THEN. THEN MANY THOUSANDS OF YEARS LATER. ANOTHER FALSE JEW. "JOHN D ROCKEFELLER". HAD HELPED BRING HITLER INTO POWER. HITLER HIMSELF WHO HAD JEWISH ROOTS. !MY MY. THE ZIONIST FALSE JEWS HAVE WOVEN A !GREAT !GREAT LIE. HAVEN'T THEY? THEM EXTERMINATING MILLIONS OF THEIR OWN PEOPLES IN EUROPE. JUST TO STEAL THE IDENTITY OF GODS PEOPLES. !MANY WHO SAY THE "ALLEGED" WORLD WAR II "JEWISH HOLOCAUST" WAS A !FAKE AND A !HOAX. A !PLAN.
AND
THE
ENTIRE
JEWISH
HOLOCAUST
BEFORE
AND
DURING
WORLD
WAR
II.
WAS
ALL
JUST
"SET-UP"
BY THE ROTHSCHILD'S AND THE ROCKEFELLER'S THEN. BUT
ALSO BY THE "BRITISH GOVERNMENT", AND BY THE "AMERICAN GOVERNMENT". IT
ALL BEING A PLOT TO "ELEVATE" THE GERMANIC/JEWISH RACE. INTO THE HOLY
LAND OF ISRAEL. IN ORDER TO "STEAL-AWAY" THE LAND OF ISRAEL FOR THE
GERMANIC RACES. THE "GERMANIC RACES" OF PEOPLES. BEING THE WHITE
AMERICAN'S, THE WHITE ENGLISH, THE WHITE GERMAN'S OF COURSE. BUT ALSO
THE WHITE ISRAELIS. THEM ALL BEING COUSINS. AND ARE OF THE SAME
BIBLICAL RACES. AND !THIS WILL EXPLAIN "EXACTLY". WHY IT WAS THE
GOVERNMENTS OF "ENGLAND" AND "THE UNITED STATES". HAD "INSURED"
AND "SECURED" THE LAND OF "ISRAEL" FOR THE "FALSE JEWS". AND !THAT OF
WHICH WAS THE
"END GAME" AND THE "PLAN" OF WORLD WAR II THEN-AFTER. AND IT ALSO BEING
THE
"EXACT" REASON WHY THE U.S., THE ENGLISH, AND THE GERMAN GOVERNMENTS.
ARE SO DAMN SUPPORTIVE OF THE GOVERNMENT OF "ISRAEL" TODAY. THIS ALL
BEING AN "END TIME" PLOT TO DEFRAUD GODS !TRUE "BLACK" HEBREW ISRAELITE
PEOPLES. WHO ARE WE THE "BLACK PEOPLES". AND IT BEING A PLAN OF
"SATAN'S". AND IT BEING THE PLAN OF "MAGOG" AND "GOG". AND OF THE
"CAUCASIAN RACE". !IT OF WHICH IS ACCOMPANIED BY THEIR !FALSE RELIGIONS
IN EUROPE AND IN THE AMERICA'S. AND IN GERMANY AND IN ISRAEL. !ALL OF
THEM
WHO ARE "GOG" AND "MAGOG".
|
The
Black
Athenian's: BY ANTONIO MARK MCCOY SR. It was said that
the
Goddess "Athena", who is Zeus' favorite daughter,
founded Athena. As he gave his favorite daughter Athena the land of
Greece.
Of course, since it bears her name, the origin of the Capital City of
Athens
was her Royal City. The Egyptian's further tell us that Ancient
Athens/Athena
was built 17,000 years ago. And Athena was black and woolly haired,
originating
from Africa (Libya). As the Chief God Zeus was a Mulatto God as
I said in my "Children's of the Gods E-Book". The
Goddess Athena
was also known as Anath, Medusa, and the Egyptian Goddess
Neith. As the Ancient
Athenian's and the Ancient Egyptian's were the same peoples. Who were
Sirian
in origin. Descendant from the Sirian Titan's they were. The Cousins of
the Black Sirian's. As the Sirian God "Ra" was the cousin of the Titan
descended God Zeus. As Ra was also the Lemurian, as well as the
Egyptian God. While Zeus was the Atlantean and Greek God.
Confusing, isn't it?
- But whilst Zeus'
Favorite Daughter Athena fought against Atlantis.
Well her peoples did. Zeus' son Hercules, served the
Atlantean's later. As I will inform
you about later. While Thoth or Hermes was also Zeus' figurative son.
And
ruled over Atlantis and over Ancient Egypt later. I can go on with the
connections. As you can see how the Gods. Who were Alien Races of
Peoples
playing Gods then. Played roles in every Major Civilization. As if they
orchestrated it all? The Goddess Athena was Black like her brother
Apollo,
as well as Hercules, Aphrodite, Artemis, Hepaestus, and Ares. As Athena
was given Greece by Zeus. Just like Zeus gave his daughter-wife
"Europa"
Western Europe to rule. While Zeus brother Poseidon ruled rival
Atlantis.
What a mess. Any ways Athena had Greece and modeled a perfect and very
strong society. As she was a strong Goddess, who had modeled her
peoples
after her own likeness. Because they were Powerful Warriors.
- The First Black
Athenian's were virtually the same peoples as the
Ancient Egyptian's. Who were both of Sirian origin. According to
stories
that the Egyptian Priests told Solon. These Athenian's fought an
aggressive
war against the Rulers of Atlantis. These Ancient and Powerful Kings
and
rulers of Atlantis had formed a Confederation by which they had
controlled
Atlantis and other Islands as well. They began a war from their
homeland
in the Atlantic Ocean and sent Fighting Troops to Europe, Africa, and
Asia.
Against this attack the Men of Athens formed a Coalition from all over
Greece to halt it. When this Coalition met with difficulties against
the
Atlantean's, their allies deserted them and the Athenian's fought on
alone
to defeat the Atlantian Rulers eventually.
- The First
Kingdom of
Athena was said to have been (by the Egyptian
Priest) one of the most culturally and militarily superior countries on
Earth during it's time. And also being even greater even than Egypt.
Her
Sister Country. As the Egyptian Priest had described it as being
powerful
in war, as well as in governorship. More importantly, Athens at that
time
had stood as the last line of defense against the imperialist
aggression
of the Great Atlantean Empire. Which had threatened to conquer Egypt,
Athens,
and all of Europe and Asia. Plus the rest of Africa. As the Athenian's
had routed the Atlantean's in the final Atlantean conquest attempt of
Europe,
Africa, and Asia. Sending the Atlantean's fleeing back to their Island
Continent in the year 8,788 B.C.
- Atlantis sought
to
conquer the entire world. All but Athens sued
for peace, leaving Athens to stand alone against the awesome might of
the
Atlantean Armed Forces then. However, Athens had shone forth, in the
excellence
of her virtue and strength, among all Mankind then. Not only repelling
the Atlantean onslaught, but driving them out of Europe and North
Africa
altogether. As Athens had soundly defeated the Atlantean's then. Badly
beaten, the Atlantean Navy had limped back to their home ports. Then,
in
a single day and night, both the Athenian, as well as the Atlantis
Military
were both destroyed. As the Atlantean's had lured the Athenian Navy
into
a trap afterwards. Then destroyed it with the use of Home-Based Death
Ray
Weaponry. As the Athenian Army had pursued the Atlantean's back to
Atlantis,
to finally destroy the Atlantean threat. After that, Atlantis was
herself
destroyed. Leaving the Egyptian's as the new world power then. As
Athens
was then absorbed by it's Sister Country Egypt.
- After the
destruction
of Atlantis and the Flood of Noah, the Second
Athenian's rose up from the Descendants of an Egyptian who was a
Descended
of Ham. Who was named King Kekpere Senusret. Who was known as "Cecrops"
by the Greeks. And Greece was once called 'Negreecia". Negreecia
meaning
"Negra" or "Nigra". Meaning "Black". As it was occupied by Blacks from
Egypt in ancient times. Crete and Cyprus were also Black Settlements
and
Copper was mined by the Egyptian's in Cyprus. The first and original
Minoans
on Crete were called the "Eteo-Cretans". They were a Black Peoples and
of Hametic origin. And they were the Descendants of the Philistines.
It's
a known historical fact that the Black Philistines were the first
Sea-loving
Sea-going peoples after the Great Flood of Noah. We know they are
Descendants
of "Casluhim". Who is a Descendant of "Mizram". Who is a Descendant of
"Ham".-
That very
Sea-loving and
Sea-going nature was inherited by the Black
Minoans later. Who so-called mysteriously appeared on the Island of
Crete
around 3100 B.C. According to some White Historian's. !Yea, what ever.
They didn't mysteriously appear there. They were the Descendants of the
Black Philistines. And that is why they were there. As they were a
Black
Peoples, which is definitely indicated in a 15th century B.C. Egyptian
Wall Painting. An original work that showed Cretans as a Black Peoples.
A painting that can be seen in a book called; "Atlantis and the Lost
Lands
by Roy Stemman". As they were a Black Peoples who
use to trade Cooper with Egypt. Then they lost their island nation to others
later. Of course those others were the White Cretans who took over
Greek
society later. Who were the White Dorian Greeks. Senusret founded the City
of Athens Long
before the arrival of any White Indo-European Greeks. As history shows
the White Greeks arriving as the invasion of
Indo-European Nomads
between 1700 to 1500 B.C. Long, long, long, after
Athena was
established by the
"Original
Egyptian's". As it was first established by the Goddess Athena. Then
later revived years B.C. by Senusret. |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mining_in_Afghanistan Historical
mining
concentrated
mostly
on
precious
stone
production,
with
some
of
the
oldest
known
mines in the
world believed to have been established in Afghanistan. Lapis lazuli
was being mined in the Badakhshan province of Afghanistan as early as
8000 BC.[8] In ancient Egypt, lapis lazuli was a favorite stone for
amulets and ornaments such as scarabs and was used in Egypt's pyramids.
The mine of Aynak's copper has more than 2,000 years of history, from the coins and the tools that were found there. The gold of Zarkashan has more than 2,000 years of history in Ghazni Province. Afghanistan lies on the Tethyan Eurasian mineral belt, which starts in Turkey and runs through Iran to Asia as far as Indonesia. There are other mineral belts in Afghanistan, formed through the violent collisions of tectonic plates tens of millions of years ago, which also created the 25,000 ft mountains in the north-east of the country. |
http://creative.sulekha.com/the-sun-king-and-dasharatha_103216_blog - The Sun King and Dasharatha Subhash Kak - A
sad
consequence
of
the
racist
historiography
of
the
19th
century
Indologists
and
their
successors
is the neglect of India's interaction
with Africa. Cyril Hromnik's Indo-Africa (1981) is the only book on the
Indian contribution to the history of sub-Saharan Africa that I am
aware of, but it is just an exploratory study.
-
- The story of India's interaction with Egypt is better known, if only to scholars. Two important figures in this story are Dasharatha and the Sun King -- and I don't mean the Suryavanshi king Dasharatha and his son Rama, nor Louis IV, the French Sun King. My subjects are two historical persons with Indic connections -- one from North Mesopotamia and the other from Egypt. - The Sun King Akhenaten of Egypt (ruled 1352-1336 BC according to the mainstream view) was the son-in-law to Dasharatha, the Mitanni king of North Syria, through the queen, Kiya. (The name Dasharatha is spelled Tushratta in the Hittite cuneiform script, which does not distinguish between 'd' and 't' very well. Some have suggested that the Sanskrit original is Tvesharatha, “having splendid chariots.”) Letters exchanged between Akhenaten and Dasharatha have been found in Amarna in Egypt and other evidence comes from the tombs of the period that have been discovered in excellent condition. - The Amarna age is now one of the best-known and most romantic periods of ancient Egypt. Akhenaten was a revolutionary in his religious beliefs, and many argue that his ideas mark the beginnings of the Western monotheistic tradition. This period also saw the fabulously beautiful Nefertiti, Akhenaton's first queen who had her own Mitanni connection, palace intrigues, artistic triumph and great personal tragedy. - The Mitanni, who worshiped Vedic gods, belonged to an Indic kingdom that was connected by marriage across several generations to the Egyptian 18th dynasty to which Akhenaten belonged. The first Mitanni king was Sutarna I (“good sun”). He was followed by Paratarna I (“great sun”), Parashukshatra (“ruler with axe”), Saukshatra (“son of Sukshatra, the good ruler”), Paratarna II, Artatama or Ritadhama (“abiding in cosmic law”), Sutarna II, Dasharatha, and finally Mativaja (Matiwazza, “whose wealth is prayer”) during whose lifetime the Mitanni state appears to have become a vassal to Assyria. - The daughter of King Artatama was married to Tuthmose IV, Akhenaten's grandfather, and the daughter of Sutarna II (Gilukhipa) was married to his father, Amenhotep III, the great builder of temples who ruled during 1390-1352 BC (“khipa” of these names is the Sanskrit “kshipa,” night). In his old age, Amenhotep wrote to Dasharatha many times wishing to marry his daughter, Tadukhipa. It appears that by the time she arrived Amenhotep III was dead. Tadukhipa married the new king Akhenaten and she became famous as the queen Kiya (short for Khipa). - The Egyptian kings had other wives as well. Akhenaten's mother, Tiye, was the daughter of Yuya, who was a Mitanni married to a Nubian. It appears that Nefertiti was the daughter of Tiye's brother Ay, who was to become king himself. The 18th dynasty had a liberal dose of Indic blood. But
how
could
an
Indic
kingdom
be
so
far
from
India,
near
Egypt?
After
catastrophic
earthquakes dried up the Sarasvati river around 1900 BC,
many groups of Indic people started moving West. We see Kassites, a
somewhat shadowy aristocracy with Indic names and worshiping Surya and
the Maruts, in Western Iran about 1800 BC. They captured power in
Babylon in 1600 BC, which they were to rule for over 500 years.
- The Mitanni ruled northern Mesopotamia (including Syria) for about 300 years, starting 1600 BC, out of their capital of Vasukhani. (For Mitanni names, I give standard Sanskrit spellings rather than the form that we find in inscriptions in the inadequate cuneiform script, such as Wassukkani for Vasukhani, “a mine of wealth.”) Their warriors were called marya, which is the proper Sanskrit term for it. - In a treaty between the Hittites and the Mitanni, Indic deities Mitra, Varuna, Indra, and Nasatya (Ashvins) are invoked. A text by a Mitannian named Kikkuli uses words such as aika (eka, one), tera (tri, three), panza (pancha, five), satta (sapta, seven), na (nava, nine), vartana (vartana, round). Another text has babru (babhru, brown), parita (palita, grey), and pinkara (pingala, red). Their chief festival was the celebration of vishuva (solstice) very much like in India. It is not only the kings who had Sanskrit names; a large number of other Sanskrit names have been unearthed in the records from the area. - Akhenaten (“glory of the Aten”) ascended the throne as Amenhotep (“Amun is content”) IV but he changed his name to honour Aten (“One god” represented as the solar disk) in his sixth year of rule. He moved his capital from Thebes to Akhetaten (“Horizon of Aten”), now known as Amarna, where palaces and buildings were built from mud brick, and in which he built a splendid temple to Aten filled with religious art. - After his father's death, he built temples on the perimeter of the famous Temple of Amun at Karnak and dedicated them to Aten, rather than Amun (“the Hidden One,” the principal deity at the time, also known as Amen). He erased the names of other gods, particularly Amun, and he also erased his father's name wherever he found it. - Some argue that Akhenaten introduced monotheism by the banishment of all deities excepting his chosen one. He has been seen as a precursor to the Old Testament prophets, and thus to the Abrahamic religions, but he must have been influenced by the belief in 'One Truth' behind appearances of the Vedic system through the three generations of queens in his family from the Mitannis. - If the Vedic element was important, as is perhaps reflected in the mysticism of the Egyptian Book of the Dead, the cult of the dead and resurrection remained the most important element of the Egyptian religion. This cult continues to form the cornerstone of the three Abrahamic faiths. - Akhenaten was succeeded by Smenkhkara, believed by some to be Nefertiti herself, and soon afterwards by Tutankhaten, Akhenaten's son by Tadukhipa (Kiya) under the regentship of Ay. Akhenaten was a fanatic and the country had suffered a great deal during his reign. The nobles now reversed course. Tutankhaten changed his name to Tutankhamen (to invoke Amun), but before he could consolidate power he was dead at the age of sixteen after a rule of just nine years. His tomb was discovered intact in 1922, and now he is widely known as the Boy-King. - Tutankhamen was followed by Ay, Nefertiti's father, who ruled for four years. He, in turn, was followed by the general Horemheb, who now erased all records of Akhenaten, and his successors. The new city was abandoned, and worship of the Amun was reestablished. Akhenaten disappeared from Egyptian history, and he was referred to as “that heretic” or “rebel,” until the reconstruction of history in modern times. Yet, his idea of a jealous god lived on, and prospered. |
http://www.stewartsynopsis.com/backwards.htm - The Global World is in a time of
Backwardness!
-
- "FROM AFRICA--NOT TO AFRICA!" Aryan
infiltrators
who
changed
ancient
Kushite
holy
books
to
suit
their
racist
purposes
introduced
the
racist
caste
system
of
India.
According
to
writers
like
Drusilla
Dunjee
Houston
(Wonderful
Ethiopians
of
the
Ancient
Kushite
Empire),
V.T.
Rajshekar,
Kly
and
Runoko
Rashidi
(Dalit:
The
Black
Untouchables
of
India),
and
Ivan
Van
Sertima/Runoko
Rashidi
(African
Presence
in
Early
Asia),
the
Blacks
of
India
were
forced
into
Casteism
by
religious
doctrine
and
the
trickery
of
the
invaders,
who
used
ancient
tribal
and
labor
traditions
and
made
a
four
tiered
caste
system,
originally
based
on
skin
color
"varna"
to
subjugate
the
native
Black
Indians
of
Kushite
African
racial
origins.
These
Kushite
African
Indians
were
the
original
inhabitants
of
India
and
created
the
first
great
civilizations
there.
Their
descendants
are
called
'Untouchables,"
or
Dalits
today,
and
their
people
of
the
same
racial
origins
and
background,
blood
type,
skin
color,
facial
features,
language
family
(Kushitic,
spread
from
West
Africa
to
the
Horn
of
Africa,
through
South
Arabia
to
India
and
Cambodia)
continue
to
be
a
significant
population
in
India
and
South
Asia.
|
http://www.africaresource.com/rasta/sesostris-the-great-the-egyptian-hercules/ancient-african-kings-of-india-by-dr-clyde-winters/comment-page-5/
-
- Ancient African Kings Of India – By Dr. Clyde Winters - Ethiopians have had very intimate relations with Indians. In fact, in antiquity the Ethiopians ruled much of India. These Ethiopians were called the Naga. It was the Naga who created Sanskrit. - A reading of ancient Dravidian literature which dates back to 500 BC, gives us considerable information on the Naga. In Indian tradition the Naga won central India from the Villavar (bowmen) and Minavar (fishermen). - The Naga were great seamen who ruled much of India, Sri Lanka and Burma. To the Aryans they described as half man and snake. The Tamil knew them as warlike people who used the bow and noose. - The earliest mention of the Naga, appear in the Ramayana , they are also mentioned in the Mahabharata. In the Mahabharata we discover that the Naga had the capital city in the Dekkan, and other cities spread between the Jumna and Ganges as early as 1300 BC. The Dravidian classic, the Chilappathikaran made it clear that the first great kingdom of India was Naganadu. - The Naga probably came from Kush-Punt/Ethiopia. The Puntites were the greatest sailors of the ancient world. In the Egyptian inscriptions there is mention of the Puntite ports of Outculit, Hamesu and Tekaru, which corresponds to Adulis, Hamasen and Tigre. - In Sumerian text, it is claimed that the Puntites traded with the people of the Indus Valley or Dilmun. According to S.N. Kramer in The Sumerians, part of Punt was probably called Meluhha, and Dilmun was probably the ancient name of the Indus Valley. (Today some scholars maintain that Oman, where we find no ancient cities was Dilmun and the Indus Valley may have been Meluhha). - Ancient Ethiopian traditions support the rule of Puntites or Ethiopians of India. In the Kebra Nagast, we find mention of the Arwe kings who ruled India. The founder of the dynasty was Za Besi Angabo. This dynasty according to the Kebra Nagast began around 1370 BC. These rulers of India and Ethiopia were called Nagas. The Kebra Nagast claims that ” Queen Makeda “had servants and merchants; they traded for her at sea and on land in the Indies and Aswan”. It also says that her son Ebna Hakim or Menelik I, made a campaign in the Indian Sea; the king of India made gifts and donations and prostrated himself before him”. It is also said that Menalik ruled an empire that extended from the rivers of Egypt (Blue Nile) to the west and from the south Shoa to eastern India”, according to the Kebra Nagast. The Kebra Nagast identification of an eastern Indian empre ruled by the Naga, corresponds to the Naga colonies in the Dekkan, and on the East coast between the Kaviri and Vaigai rivers. - The presence of Meluhhaites/ Puntites in India may expain the Greek tradition of Kusites ruling India up to the Ganges. It would also explain the Aryan traditions of Mlechchas ( Sanskrit name for some of the non-Aryan people) as one of the aboriginal groups of India. Many scholars associate the name Mlechchas with Meluhha. - The major Naga tribes were the Maravar, Eyinar, Oliyar, Oviyar, Aru-Valur and Parathavar. The Nagas resisted the invansion of the Cholas. In the Kalittokai IV,1-5, the Naga are described as being “of strong limbs and hardy frames and fierce looking tigers wearing long and curled locks of hair.” The Naga kings of Sri Lanka are mentioned in the: Mahawanso, and are said to have later become Dravidians, as testified to by the names of these people: Naganathan, Nagaratnam, Nagaraja and etc. - The major gift of the Naga to India was the writing system: Nagari. Nagari is the name for the Sanskrit script. Over a hundred years ago Sir William Jones, pointed out that the ancient Ethiopic and Sanskrit writing are one and the same. - William Jones, explained that the Ethiopian origin of Sanskrit was supported by the fact that both writing systems the writing went from left to right and the vowels were annexed to the consonants. Today Eurocentric scholars teach that Indians taught writing to the Ethiopians, yet the name Nagari for Sanskrit betrays the Ethiopia origin of this form of writing. Moreover, it is interesting to note that Sanskrit vowels: a,aa,’,I,u,e,o, virama etc., are in the same order as Geez. - The Ethiopian script has influenced many other writing systems. Y.M. Kobishnor, in the Unesco History of Africa, maintains that Ethiopic was used as the model for Armenian writing, as was many of the Transcaucasian scripts. Dravidian literature indicate that the Naga may have introduced worship of Kali, the Serpent, Murugan and the Sun or Krishna. It is interesting to note that a god called Murugan is worshipped by many people in East Africa. - It is interesting that Krishna, who was associated with the Sun, means Black, this is analogous to the meaning of Khons of the Kushites. Homer, described Hercules as follows: “Black he stood as night his bow uncased, his arrow string for flight”. This mention of arrows identifies the Kushites as warriors who used the bow, a common weapon of the Kushites and the Naga. -  - Kumarinadu - The Naga or Ethiopians were defeated by Dravidian speaking people from Kumarinadu. Kamarinadu is suppose to have formerly existed as a large Island in the India ocean which connected India with East Africa. This landmass is mentioned in the Silappadikaram, which said that Kamarinadu was made up of seven nadus or regions. The Dravidian scholars Adiyarkunallar and Nachinaar wrote about the ancient principalities of Tamilaham, which existed on Kamarinadu. - Kumarinadu was ruled by the Pandyans/Pandians at Madurai before it sunk beneath the sea. The greatest king of Kumarinadu was Sengoon. According to Dravidian scholars the Pandyans worshipped the goddess Kumari Amman. This Amman, probably corresponds to the ancient god Amon of the Kushites. - The Kalittokai 104, makes it clear that after the Pandyans were forced to migrate off their Island home into South India, “to compensate for the area lost to the great waves of the sea, King Pandia without tiresome moved to the other countries and won them. Removing the emblems of tiger (Cholas) and bow (Cheras) he, in their place inscribed his reputed emblem fish (Pandia’s) and valiantly made his enemies bow to him”. http://tamilandvedas.com/2012/08/27/did-indians-build-egyptian-pyramids/ - Scholars around the world knew the connection between India and Egypt from 1400 BC. That was the time Mittanni King Dasaratha wrote ten letters (it is available in all the encyclopaedias as Amarna letters) after marrying his daughter to Egyptian king Amhenotep (Sramana Dev). Tushratta/ Dasaratha was a king who ruled Syria (now a Muslim country), but his name and his forefather names are in Sanskrit. To confirm they are Indian Hindus we have an inscription giving the Vedic Gods Mitra, Varuna, Indra and Nasatya (Asvini Devas) in an agreement with the Hittites and a horse manual with Sanskrit numbers. - (Though all these things were in encyclopaedias from 1930s, the ruling British were very careful not to teach this or about South East Asian Hindu Empire to Indian History students. All these excavations were done by non British scholars! British were very successful in sowing the poisonous seeds of divisive Aryan Dravidian Invasion theory which is not in Sangam Tamil or Sanskrit literature. They carefully hid facts like Tamils worshipped Indra, Varuna, Vishnu, Skanda and Durga which was found in the oldest Tamil book Tolkappiam). Bible which was put
to
writing
around 945 BC (Hutchinson Encyclopaedia) also gave Sanskrit words
for
imports from India such as karpasa (cotton),Tuke (Siki for peacock or
Suka for parrots), Kapi (monkey)etc.
-
- But many of us do not know that the first king of Egypt was Manu, the law giver. But they were not Dasaratha of Valmiki Ramayana or Manu of Manu Dharma Sastra. Many of us do not know that the Egyptian builders used the Sanskrit word Sutra for measurements during building Egyptian Pyramids. Sulba Sutras are Vedic manuals giving measurements for Yaga Kundas (fire pits for sacrificial fire ceremonies). It contains Pythagorean Theorem and other Vedic mathematics. Sutra means thread/plumb line,also book of formulas. - Arta Dama, a Mittanni king, married his daughter to Egyptian king Tuthmose IV and the daughter of Sutharna was married to Amenhotep III (1390 BC). Another daughter was married to his son Akhenaten. He was the most revolutionary king who established ONE GOD for the Egyptians. His name in Sanskrit means Eka Aten (One Aten is God). He worshiped Surya (sun). - Egyptian kings’ sun worship looks exactly like Brahmins doing Sandhyavandhana. Brahmins do it thrice a day facing sun. Egyptian kings worship the sun in the same way. - Manu=Nara Meru - In my earlier posts I have established that the big conflict between Krishna/Arjuna pair and the Nagas under the leadership of Maya Dhanava just before 3100 BC resulted in a mass exodus of Nagas to South America and Central America. After Krishna’s burning of Naga lands (Kandava vana) in the Gangetic plains, there were continuous clashes. It was followed by the mass execution of Nagas (Sarpa Yagna) to avenge the assassination of King Parikshit by the Nagas. A Naga hid himself in the fruit basket and killed King Parikshit. - Around 3100 BC another dynasty started their rule in Egypt. Since they were Hindus, they named the first king Manu (Manes). His other name was Narmer i.e. Nara Meru, a pure Sanskrit word meaning Mountain among the Kings. Meru was the holiest and highest mountain in Hindu Mythology. Any high point was named Meru. We have different Merus around the world. Pameru (Pamir Plateau), KuMeru (Kumari in the South of India). Su Meru (Sumerians) of the Middle East. The word Khmer of Cambodia may be related to Kumari/Ku Meru. I will write about it separately. North and South Poles were also called Merus in Hindu Mythologies (Puranas). - Menes was given a legendary date 3100 BC by the Greeks because Indian Kaliyuga Calendar begins in 3102 BC. Mayans also followed this Kali Yuga Calendar. (Full details are in my posts) - Menes (Manu) was praised the first Law Giver of Egypt by the Greek Historian Diodorous Siculus. Egyptians were just like Indian Hindus. They believed kings were half God, half man. Indian words for kings and palaces are synonymous with Gods and Temples. Diodorous links Heracles (Hercules) with Egypt and India. Hercules was one of the 12 ancient Gods of Egypt and he cleared India of wild animals, says Diodorous. - Narmer palette shows his picture as a strict man punishing the wrong ones. - ( In Tamil Khon means King and God, Koil means Palace and temple, In Sanskrit Deva is used for Lord and the King). Khon became Khan in other languages like Kesari/lion gave a new word Caesar. Tele in the Ancient Middle East means temple, which is the corrupted form of Sanskrit word STHALA. Tamils changed it to Thali=temple) - Egyptian kings called themselves children of Surya/sun. This corresponds with the Surya Vamsa of Hindu scriptures. Like Indian Hindu kings, Egyptian kings had two names : 1. Name given at birth 2. Coronation name or Abisheka Nama. http://www.sacred-texts.com/afr/we/we17.htm - THE CIVILIZATION OF INDIA. - Asia is a continent in which republics were unusual in early ages. Here history reveals monarchies under despotic rulers, who were worshipped as though the subjects were mere slaves. India until late ages was under a very different form of government. In early Buddhist times we find the land full of aristocratic republics. This was the same form of government to be found on other Cushite sites. Here in a more isolated clime, remote from outside influences, the old Cushite communal form of government has come on down to our times. Much can be gained from a study of this unique system. Out of it came the gentleness of the Hindu and it was the environment that nourished his exalted mental attainments. Again it is too lightly considered, when we remember that this form of life produced artists and craftsmen who brought into existence lost arts and a skill and originality that we do not today attain. It is a common error to suppose that the tribes that the Aryan invaders found were savages. Ancient annals represented the Cushite Indi as wise and skillful. Heeren said that these writings represented the early Hindu as a commercial people, that their merchants could travel from one - p. 211 - of the Nile flowing through Barabra (Ethiopia) and the mountains of the Moon. Even the name Hindu is Ethiopian. Ancient records of authority made Hind and Sind sons of Cush. Philostratus. in Vit. Apollon (Lib. II), says, "The Indi are the wisest of mankind. The Ethiopians are a colony of them, and they inherit the wisdom of their fathers." The separation of India from the parent Cushite stock was in ages long before the rise of the so-called Aryans in India. The older Greeks always associated the sacred waves of the Indian Sea with the wonderful Ethiopians. Ephorus stated that they occupied all the southern coasts of Asia and Africa. As in Chaldea they brought to the aboriginal tribes of India the knowledge of metals to take the place of stone implements, they brought the knowledge of the arts. Their funeral remains all over India reveal the stone circles and upright massive menhirs of North Africa. They understood in those far distant ages how to make hard earthenware, iron weapons and ornaments of gold. Today in a state of degenerated art, Sind is the only province where the potters craft is artistic. Before Megathenes, a Greek ambassador to the court of the non-Aryan Chandra Gupta, about 300 B. C., the Greeks mentioned as Indi only the Cushites of the areas between the Hindu Kush and Persia. - The name India means black, and Condor thinks that it was employed only to designate the home of the Asiatic Ethiopians. Let us look for a brief space at the land. India has often been described - p. 212 - as almost a continent of itself, surrounded as it is by high mountain ranges to the north with the spurs stretching out to east and west, leaving only two natural passages down into the peninsula. India has a rich and varied climate and landscape. First come the Himalayas with their colder atmosphere, then the vast, fertile, densely populated plains of northern India watered by the Indus, the great Ganges and the Bramaputra. These have the greatest volume of any rivers of the world. South of the great northern plain is the elevated plateau of Decan. The Ganges has meant so much to the life and development of the country that it is a sacred river to the Hindu. Almost all the traffic of the country passes up and down this river. Southern India has a tropical climate. The Indian plains are sultry but Decan and the slopes of the Himalayas enjoy a temperate climate. There are two annual seasons the rainy and the dry. - Modern books deal with forest destruction in India and the wearing out of the land. These are the result of conquest and the crowding back of tribes upon the more waste areas. The great Indian rivers cause terrible disasters through floods that sweep off cattle, grain, stores and houses. The mighty currents undermine and carry away soil to build up monstrous deltas. Still with all these disasters India has an age old system of agriculture and we see everywhere the evidences of a people long skilled in agriculture. Northern India produces the plants of the temperate zone in profusion. Southern India abounds - p. 213 - in tropical verdure. Two harvests are sometimes reaped in one year. Rice grows in the irrigated districts. Many think that cotton was first developed in India and that many other important plants found there their origin. We find indigo, jute, tobacco, sugar cane, cocoa, the date and other palms. Among the tropical fruits are the orange, lime, citron, melon, pineapple, fig and other fruits. The dense growth of tropical woods affords some of the world's most important plants. Here we find resins, gums, perfumes and varnishes with hundreds of other articles of commerce or luxury. - These wonderful and useful plains and fruits of India are not the result of accident, but are the fruit of the genius of some continuously agricultural race. These products were the foundation of the age old art and commerce of the Indies, that in the days of Columbus made the route to India the world sought quest of western nations. Nearly every article that produces commerce abounds in India. All the shrubs and herbs needed for the healing of the nations may be found there and are used as native medicines. Rice and millet are the staple foods, though sweet potatoes, onions, barley and garlic are much used. The vast forests are densely populated with wild animals and birds. The leopard, wolf, tiger, hyena, fox and jackal abound, the lion is extinct. Snakes and reptiles cause innumerable death. The tiger is in every part of the country. One tiger in the course of three years killed one hundred and eight persons and another caused thirteen - p. 214 - villages to be abandoned. There is a government price on the tiger's head. The tamer animals are deer, sheep, goats, antelope, oxen, camels, mules, horses and many birds. With this rich flora and fauna a distinctive ancient life developed and flowered as gorgeously in religion and art. - A glance at India today reveals a great difference from the old condition of opulence. The country has grown overpopulated. Many districts are so overcrowded that the natives can hardly secure land to cultivate. Life in the British Isles is very congested, the population being about 213 to a square mile, but in India we find 271 to the square mile. In England the people support themselves by working in the industries. India has very few large towns. Millions are struggling to live and support themselves on half an acre. If the rains fall short by only a few inches, there is terrible scarcity of food and thousands die. This condition is due to the fact also that the old industrial system of the Hindu has been destroyed. Once they manufactured in their homes and thus kept themselves from want. During the centuries of misrule after the various conquests of India, the land became full of robbers and armed bands. Since introduction of railroads by the English, the natives are slowly moving from the congested districts to the few remaining spare lands. In ancient days each rural family was rooted to the spot of its ancestry. - The first glimpses that we catch of the Hindu in historical times we find a people of varied - p. 215 - ethnology. The popular theory emphasizes an Aryan invasion that took place in late ages, compared to the primitive times when the deeds of the Indian epics were, enacted. As late as the authoritative records of history, the most powerful kingdoms of India were ruled over by non-Aryan princes. These were the Indi of the ancient records. This ruling race had produced the culture that passed down, and just as across all the wide belt of the equator the civilization of the ancient Cushite was appropriated--here it was not destroyed. So intermixed are all the classes of the Hindu today that all Brahmin, and Soudra have identically the same formation of skull, the old formation of Ethiopia. This later Brahmic type which has only ruled India in the Christian Era is Turanian in the same sense that the races of western Europe may be so called. These Turanians entering India were inferior in culture to the Indi. Today after continued conquest, we find great peoples using literary languages among the Dravidians who represent the primitive Cushite stock. Such are the Tamils, Telugu, Malayalam and Kanarese. Authorities dispute the claim that the black Rajputs were the same race as the invading Turanians. The ancient books read without prejudice reveal a deadly contest between Brahmins and the Kshattriyas, the original royal stock. - The literature reveals that this hostility did not come to an end until the Brahmins gave up the hope of holding the sovereignty and took over the custody of the ancient books and the - p. 216 - priesthood. We read in Buddhist India, p. 44, that it is a common error to suppose that the tribes with whom the so-called Aryans came in contact were savages. Some were, but there were also settled communities with a highly developed social organization, wealthy enough to excite the cupidity of invaders. These people were too much addicted to peace to be able to offer prolonged resistance, but they were strong enough to impose many of their ideas and institutions upon their conquerors. On page 59 we read, "It is now generally admitted that there are no pure Aryans in India, in spite of the theoretical restrictions on intermarriage. Aryan, Kolarin and Dravidian could not at the time of the rise of Buddah be recognized. Long before the theory of caste had been brought into working order a fusion sufficient at least to obliterate completely the old landmarks had been accomplished." In the ancient books of India there is, no mention of caste. Long before the time of Alexander all the Hindu were a dark race. - Baldwin declares that Indo-Aryans were but a small proportion of the whole population of India. All over the country are masses, whose dialects reveal that they did not belong to the Indo-European group. Cushites entering India in primitive ages perhaps found aboriginal Malays. They did not exterminate them but conciliated, civilized and to some extent absorbed them. This was the Ethiopian custom over their wide domains. In the central provinces an aboriginal Malay race forms a large proportion of the - p. 217 - population, showing that the Cushites may have refused to intermix. The struggle represented as taking place between these Cushites and their conquerors might have been but a later emigration of their race as the Cassite invaders of Chaldea. We would think this from the identity of skull formation of all the racial divisions of India. The hill people of the Himalayas have always been fair, as we find Cushite people on all the continents where they were not exposed to the torrid rays of the sun. The Casdim or Cassites of ancient days occupied the highlands of southwestern Asia from Caucasus to the highlands of India. Does it not seem more reasonable that this learned race as proved by the Chaldeans and Elamites sent the type into India that made her ruling class. 5000 years ago we
have
shown
there was no branch of the Aryan race that could have produced the
Rig-Veda. 5000 years ago no Japhethic nation possessed blacksmiths,
chariots, and the civilization that the Rig-Veda reveals. It seems to
be the story of the passage to the southwest of Hindu colonists from
the mountains of Hindu-Kush (Cush) down into the plains of India. Note
the name of the region from which they came. In the beginning these
invaders took Dravidian wives because most probably they, were
primarily of the same stock. 3000 to 4500 B. C. the father is
represented with the ancient Cushite traits in all their glory. He was
priest of the family. He conducted human sacrifice, for which the horse
sacrifice was substituted in later
-
- p. 218 - ages. There was no burning of widows and woman enjoyed a high position. The Rig-Veda represents these people at this far distant age as blacksmiths, barbers, coppersmiths, goldsmiths, carpenters and husbandmen. They fought from chariots as did all Cushite nations. They settled down as husbandmen to till the fields. Unlike the modern Hindu they ate beef. They adored gods identical with those of Egypt, Chaldea and Ethiopia. Who were these people who 4500 B. C. possessed towns and built ships? Semites and Turanians had no such arts. - When the Hebrews left Egypt they did not understand the art of welding iron. Persians in late ages used Egyptians as their carpenters. The historic Greek and Roman at this early age had not emerged from caves and use of rude stone tools. Let us glance at the Goths as they appeared on the plains of western Europe as late as the Christian Era and see if we find the race traits that the Rig-Veda reveals. They possessed no knowledge of metals. They scorned images and temples, therefore they had no priests. The name of not a single Gothic deity has come down to us. They showed not the faintest glimmer of the mentality and austerity of life of the Buddhist. They were coarse and gluttonous. They loved strong drink and would lay for days in drunken stupor in the ashes of their hearths. They appropriated the gods of the long headed race of western Europe, Odin and Thor. They knew nothing of agriculture being a nomadic race fitted for conquest. They had no communal interests - p. 219 - as the people of India, they were extreme individualists. They battered down the grand structures of antiquity, they did not create them and smashed the art treasures of ages. Even in the Middle Ages they had developed none of the traits of the gentle Hindu and regarded not the rights of others unless compelled to do so by the sword. - Beside this picture let us line the Hindu priest. His is a type that early was devoted to ceremony. His whole life was mapped out for stages of discipline. When he had reared a family and gained a practical knowledge of the world, he retired into the forest as a recluse, using nature's wild foods. Here he practiced religious duties with increased devotion. Next he entered upon an ascetic and rigorous self-denial, wandering as a religious mendicant, wholly withdrawn from joy or pain, wholly absorbed in final absorption into the deity. He ate nothing but what was given him unasked, remained not more than one day in a village. Throughout his life he took no wine, curbed desire, shut out tumults of war, his duty was to pray and not to fight, to study-and practice self restraint. The Brahmin represents a race in India that holds supremacy not by force of arms but by vigor of hereditary culture and temperence. Dynasties have fallen, religions have spread themselves over the land and disappeared, but since the dawn of history the Brahmin has calmly ruled. - As late as the Græco-Bactrian and Scythian inroads 327 B. C. to 544 A. D. we find the fairest - p. 220 - districts of northern India still in possession of Cushites. In almost every part of Oudh and the northwestern provinces are to be found ruins ascribed to this race, which reigned at different periods from the fifth to the eleventh centuries A. D. The early invaders found as the Vedas describe, these people in possession of wealth, having cattle, cities and forts. The literature represents them as making alliances with the native Cushite princes, this would have been impossible if they had not been of the same race. The Nubians (Cushites) of old Ethiopia will not intermarry with Arabs or Egyptians. Some superficial interpretations of the Vedas attempt to make out the Dravidian Cushites as disturbers of sacrifices, lawless, without gods, and without rites. This would not describe Cushites anywhere in the world. For at no stage of their development do they seem to be without sacrifice, law and religion, which rites they gave to the ancient world. That section of the Vedas describes Cushites finding the aborigines of the country without these rites, which they naturally at first opposed. - To those who read the Rig-Veda intelligently and without the confusing glasses of prejudice, these mutilated and interpolated writings are but a description of the familiar traits and customs of Cushite Ethiopians. The Brahmins were probably a much later and intermixed branch of the inhabitants of Hindu-Kush. That they were intermixed we can tell by their cruelty. Full blooded Cushites are very gentle. The fact that the Brahmins altered the Sanskrit writings to such great - p. 221 - extent is proof itself that they were not the original authors of these works. They took over and appropriated much from Buddhism that would appeal to the masses when they found it otherwise impossible for them to sit in the saddle of the priesthood. An ancient treatise tells us of the early Cushite element, that they adorned their dead with gifts, with raiment, and ornaments, imagining thereby that they shall attain the world to come. Their ornaments were bronze, copper and gold. One non-Aryan chief described this race as of fearful swiftness, unyielding in battle, in color like a dark blue cloud. This old type is represented today by the compact masses at the south. These Dravidians constitute forty-six millions of southern Indians today. They represent the unmixed Cushite type. All the rest of the blood of India is heavily mixed with this strain. - These Dravidians that the untruthful book seeks to represent today as despised outcasts when they are still a very important division of the Hindu population, entered India in primitive times by the northwest passage. They were a part of that advancing wave of the Old Race that swept eastward and westward, peopling primitive Arabia, Egypt and Chaldea. The rich merchants of the ancient Indian commerce had been Dravidians. One of their greatest kingdoms was Pandya so noted in the Sanskrit writings. The Nandas in Behar of whom the great Chandra Gupta sprang and his greater grandson Asoka, were non-Aryan. These were of the supposed-to-be degraded Sudra. The Takshak and Naga nations - p. 222 - who figure so largely in Sanskrit traditions are words purely African. Koch or Kush (Cush) form the masses of Bengal and Behar. By virtue of their descent from the old dominant race they retain their name of Kshattriya and call themselves Rajbansis a term exactly corresponding to Rajput. The rajas of Kuch Behar claim a divine descent. The name Rajput means of royal descent. It was the title of the old conquering class of the ancient Cushites. There was alliance between them and the Brahmins. We find distinguished bodies of the Kshattriyan so-called caste received into the Brahmin caste and for the same reason sections of aboriginal races manufactured into Brahmins. - In the Hindu Puranas the Dravidian kingdom of Pandya was given two dynasties. The first had seventy-three kings, the second forty-three kings. The last king of the second dynasty was overthrown 1324 A. D. by the Mohammedans. No other Dravidian kingdom can boast so continuous a succession as the kings of Madura. The chronicles enumerate fifty Chara kings and fifty-six Chola kings as well as many minor dynasties. Dr. Deiche and Isaac Taylor thought the Hindu alphabet derived from the south Arabian and adopted a thousand years later by the Brahmins. The early history of the Dravidians is yet to be deciphered from mouldering palm leaves and more trustworthy inscriptions on copper and stone. Like the Minoan script of Crete and the Merotic of Ethiopia this is a third of the Ethiopic stem the has not been interpreted. In the - p. 223 - territory of the Dravidians, we find extensive ruins of ancient temples, fortifications, tanks, bridges and vast remains. - The Dravidians in ethnic type are Ethiopian and are the race of India from which her civilization originated. Megathenes said that the natives of India and Ethiopia were not much different in complexion or feature. Dravidians are short like the race of the Mediterranean called Iberians and the Chaldeans. Their complexions are black or very dark. Their hair is plentiful and crispy. Their heads are elongated with the nose very broad. They occupy the oldest geological formation of India. They are descendants of that race of black men with short woolly hair that were the primitive inhabitants of ancient Media, Susiana and Persia, mentioned repeatedly in the Iranian legends, and whose faces look out at us from the sculptures of Babylon and Nineveh Dravidian is spoken by forty-six millions of India, not including the numerous uncultivated hill tribes and retired communities. A form of speech similar to it is spoken in Beluchistan, which originally was Cushite. In all the political changes that come to India, the communal type of life to which these natives cling never changes. - In ancient times India was ruled by Rajas, who were assisted by a council of elders. Sometimes the Raja was influenced by a queen mother or dowager. In Cushite races lineage was traced through the mother. The succession of the Rajah was traced in the same way. This was changed upon the ascendency of the Brahmins. Turanians - p. 224 - trace lineage from the father's side. Some authors have sought to prove that the metronymic system or inheritance through the female line is evidence of promiscuity in the beginning of human life. In savage life men and women pair in mating, also among anthropoid apes proving that this instinct is as old as the human species. The spirit of the Cushite was to honor and exalt woman, therefore lineage was thus traced. Nephews when born of sisters were treated as sons and inherited the property to the exclusion of sons. Devalle described the queen of Ilaza as a black Ethiopian. He said she ruled like a woman of judgment. Marco Polo described the inhabitants of India as black and adorned with massive gold bracelets and strings of rare and precious gems. They had temples and priests. Vasco de Gama while circumnavigating the globe found the inhabitants black. - The Dravidians Sudanese /Ethiopian Indians Africa extended
into what
is
now called India. The Dravidians or original peoples sometimes referred
to as Dalits are Ethiopians/Africans. The term Dalits means Bound and
the name may have been given to them by those who enslaved them and put
them in a racist caste system at the lowest levels. the Dalits or
Dravidians were the indigenous peoples of India or the Eastern
Ethiopians or Eastern Africans.
-
- "The distinction between the black-skinned Sudroid races of southern India and the fair-skinned Aryan races of northern India is not an invention of English colonialist historians; it is a feature mentioned by the earliest Greek travelers who visited south Asia centuries before the advent of Robert Clive. - The ancient Greeks considered the Africans and Sudras (modern Dalits and Dravidians) as belonging to the same `Ethiopian' stock. `Ethiopian' was the Greek word for `Negro', and Greek authors referred to the African Negroes as `Western Ethiopians' and to the Sudroids as `Eastern Ethiopians' (ie. Eastern Negroes) [ cf. Herodotus.VI.70 ] - Witness the following citation from Herodotus - - " The Eastern Ethiopians, [ ie. Sudras ] differed in nothing from the other Ethiopians, save in their language, and the character of their hair. For the Eastern Ethiopians have straight hair, while they of Libya are more woolly-haired than any other people in the world. " - " [I]n other respects India is not unlike Ethiopia, and the Indian rivers have crocodiles like the Ethiopian and Egyptian Nile; and some of the Indian rivers have fish and other large water animals like those of the Nile, save the river-horse: though Onesicritus states that they do have the river-horse also. The appearance of the inhabitants, too, is not so far different in India and Ethiopia; the southern Indians resemble the Ethiopians a good deal, and, are black of countenance, and their hair black also, only they are not as snub-nosed or so woolly-haired as the Ethiopians; but the northern Indians are most like the Egyptians in appearance. " Arrian, `Anabasis Alexandri, Book VIII (Indica),' Chapter 6, tr. E. Iliff Robson (1933) - The Two Ethiopia's: - "I might almost say that the same animals are to be found in India as in Aethiopia and Egypt, and that the Indian rivers have all the other river animals except the hippopotamus, although Onesicritus says that the hippopotamus is also to be found in India. As for the people of India, those in the south are like the Aethiopians in colour, although they are like the rest in respect to countenance and hair (for on account of the humidity of the air their hair does not curl), whereas those in the north are like the Egyptians. " - It is sometimes alleged that these eminent historians are not referring to the Sudras in general, but only to the Pygmies of the Andamans. This theory is refuted by the following statement of the Periplus, which no doubt describes the tall and black Malabari Dravidians - - Beyond the gulf of Baraca is that of Barygaza and the coast of the country of Ariaca, which is the beginning of the Kingdom of Nambanus and of all India. - "That part of it lying inland and adjoining Scythia is called Abiria, but the coast is called Syrastrene. It is a fertile country, yielding wheat and rice and sesame oil and clarified butter, cotton and the Indian cloths made there from, of the coarser sorts. Very many cattle are pastured there, and the men are of great stature and black in color. The metropolis of this country is Minnagara, from which much cotton cloth is brought down to Barygaza. In these places there remain even to the present time signs of the expedition of Alexander, such as ancient shrines, walls of forts and great wells. The sailing course along this coast, from Barbaricum to the promontory called Papica opposite Barygaza, and before Astacampra, is of three thousand stadia. "Periplus.41 - The Makran was referred to by the Greeks as `Gedrosia', ie. the land of the black people. Black Sudroids form a sizeable portion of the population in this region to this day, and formed one of the groups referred to as `East Ethiopians' [ Kondratov, p.145 ]. Indeed, several geographers considered India merely another extension of Ethiopia or Abyssinia -India as a whole originates from the north, embraces all the area which is Persian, and continues as far as Egypt and the lands of Ethiopia. " - Sources: - Riddles of 3 Oceans', Alexander Kondratov - `Anabasis Alexandri, Book VIII (Indica) ' by Arrian, tr. E. Iliff Robson (1933) - `Herodotus, The History' , trans. George Rawlinson, Dutton & Co., N.York, 1862 - `Itinerarium Alexandri,' Anonymous, 4th century AD, `Alexander's Itinerary, An English Translation' by Iolo Davies, The Ancient History Bulletin 12.1-2 (1998) 29-54 - `The Periplus of the Erythraean Sea: Travel and Trade in the Indian Ocean by a Merchant of the First Century,' W.H. Schoff (tr. & ed.), London, Bombay & Calcutta 1912. - `History of India', Mountstuart Elphinstone, J.Murray, Albemarle Street, London 1841, reprinted 1988, Atlantic Publishers New Delhi 1988. - `Geography,', Strabo, translated by H. L. Jones (ed.), http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/. - The First to populate India - When we see pictures of Indians and India most of us have no knowledge of the Dravidians or Dalits, we see black people but somehow we do not relate to them as part f our family. - The Caste system was instituted by the ruling Aryan class that invaded India. Here a some comments on that history: - "The Dravidians entered India before the Aryans, before 2000 B.C., after passing through Mesopotamia, Iran, and Baluchistan where the Brahuis, a Dravidian race, still live. On grounds of cultural affinities such as inheritance through women, snake cults, organization of society, and structure of temples, some historians connect the Dravidians with the Elamites and Mesopotamians. The evidence of Indian skulls from the Indus Valley indicates that the Mediter-ranean stock became established in north India before the Harappab Civilization came into existence around 2000 B.C." - "Of particular significance is archeologist B. B. Lal's contention that the Dravidians probably came from Nubia, Upper Egypt. This theory would give them among other things their Mediterranean features and dark complexion. Lal writes: "At Timos the Indian team dug up several megalithic sites of ancient Nubians which bear an uncanny resemblance to the cemeteries of early Dravidians which are found all over Western India from Kathiawar to Cape Comorin. The intriguing similarity extends from the subterranean structure found near them. Even the earthenware ring-stands used by the Dravidians and Nubians to hold pots were identical." According to Lal, the Nubian megaliths date from around 1000 B.C." - Here is an excerpt of an essay by Mukesh Paswan: - "Distorted Race Theory" - The term "distorted race theory" in application to the Dravidian movement, which is compared to Nazism and Hindutva. The latest genetic research, which conclusively proves that the Dravidians and Dalits belong to the same Negroid stock. The poisonous casteism, which the Indian iconoclasts suffering from, is entirely Aryan and Brahmanic origin. Historians have conclusively established that caste did not exist in the pre-Aryan age. It was introduced by racist color-conscious Aryan invaders who wished to "maintain their racial purity" from "contamination" with native Dravidians. - During the Harappan Golden Age, that the Dravidians and Dalits existed as one people, known as `Sudras'. The division between Dravidians and Adi-Dravidians is purely artificial and the result of Aryan invasions, with the former choosing to adopting Aryan culture and submit as slaves to the Aryans and the latter battling the savage Aryans, retaining their freedom in the jungles. Adi-Dravida means - it means `Original Dravidian'. `Dravida' is Sanskrit : - Dravida is of Sanskrit origin and the term `Sudra' and `Adi-Sudra' are now more in vogue for this very reason. The word `Sudra' is attested from the Vedic Dark Ages, and this word is of African origin, whilst the terms `Dravida' and `Dalit' are much later innovations. The following diagram shows how the Dravidian word `Sudra' is in fact derived from `Sudan' : - Sudan ----> Sudra (Central Africa) (Black Indian Caste) - Sanskrit - The word 'Hindu' has its origin in Sanskrit literature. In the Rig Veda, India was referred to as the country of'Sapta Sindhu', i.e. the country of seven great rivers. The word 'Sindhu' refers to rivers and sea and not merely to the specific river called the Sindhu (Indus), now in Pakistan. In Vedic Sanskrit, according to ancient dictionaries, 'sa' was pronounced as 'ha'. Thus 'Sapta Sindhu' was pronounced as 'Hapta Hindu'; similarly 'Saraswati' was pronounced as 'Haravyati' or 'Harahwati'. This is how the word 'Hindu' came into being. The ancient Persians also referred to India as 'Hapta Hind', as recorded in their ancient classic 'Bern Riyadh'. That is why some scholars came to believe that the word 'Hindu' had its origin in Persia. The Greeks who invaded India under Alexander the Great, dropped the 'H' completely and used the name Indoos or Indus which later led to the formation of the word 'India'. - Aren't we all Hapi? Hapi (Hep, Hap,
Hapy) was
probably a predynastic name for the Nile - later on, the Egyptians just
called the Nile iterw, meaning 'the river' - and so it became the name
of the god of the Nile. ('Nile' comes from the Greek corruption Neilos
- of the Egyptian 'nwy' which means 'water'.) He was mentioned in the
Pyramid Texts ("who comest forth from Hep") where he was to send the
river into the underworld from certain caverns, where he was thought to
have lived at the 1st Cataract.
- Is that HAPI another connection between the Africans in Africa and those in India and beyond? The depiction of Hapi himself, though, was that of a rather well-fed, blue or green man with the false beard of the pharaoh on his chin. - Sanskrit is a language which is mother of all languages. Sanskrit, S-a-n-s-k-r-i-t, Sanskrit language. So this is the original language of this..., not only of this planet. In other planets also, this language is spoken. - - Swami Prabhpada - Dravidian Origin: Another view which is not accepted in the west, but which is proposed in India is that the common proto language of Sanskrit was none other than some proto Dravidian language or the language spoken by the Indus people. - Sanskrit is listed with many of the sacred languages [priestly] as in heirogylphs [Egyptian] Geez [Ethiopian], original Hebrew and many others. - The term `Dalit' largely refers to the Hindi-speaking Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. The term `Adi-Dravida' (original Dalits) is most generally used by educated `Dravidian Dalits' to refer to themselves. Far from repudiating their Dravidian identity, such persons have reclaimed it from those amongst whom it exists in a purer state - What they never told you in History class. - by - Indus K. Kush The ancient Indians were described by Professor Lynn Thorndike as - ‘Short, black men with almost Negro noses.’ - Short History of Civilization p. 227 - ~~~~~~~~~~~~ - Dr. Will Durant pictures theses early Hindus as: - ‘dark skinned, broad nosed people whom, without knowing the origin of the word, we call Dravidians.’ - Our Oriental Heritage. P. 396 - ~~~~~~~~~~~~ - Shiva - The early Aryan literature of India, the hymns of the Rigvedas, which, it is commonly agreed, date from about 1000BC speak of the people whom the proud Aryan invaders found in India as black sinned…’ John Jackson Man, Go, and Civilization. - The Indus valley Civilization was a work written by Sir Mortimer Wheeler and on the book jacket it was reported that: - ‘ In 1922 at Harappa, a small town in the Punjab, and in 1922 at Mahenjo-daro in Sind, evidence was discovered of an evolved urban culture nearly 2,000 years older than any previously recognized in the Indo-Pakistan subcontinent"…’From the distribution of the sites foist explored, the culture was named the Indus Valley Civilization…" - " …a third body of evidence come from the city Chanhu-Daro which was excavated in 1031. We are now aware of the staggering 1000 Indus Valley cities covering a cultural area of more than 1100 miles east to west and 800 miles north or south, all which are pre-Aryan. - ‘…the revelation of the Indus Valley Civilization, constructed and enveloped by the south Indian Dravidians, descendants of the Nile Valley, ahs led to a complete revision of Indian History.’ Dr. Runoko Rhasidi – Nile Valley Civilization. - ‘The Ganges River, sacred to India is named after an Ethiopian King of that name who conquered Asia as far as this river.’ J.A. Rodgers - 100 amazing facts about the Negro. - There’s more! - The word Hindu is found, of course, in Persian literature. Hindu-e-falak means ‘the black of the sky’ and ‘Saturn’. In the Arabic language Hind not Hindu means nation. It is shameful and ridiculous to have read all along in history that the name Hindu was given by the Persians to the people of our country when they landed on the sacred soil of Sindhu." (R. N. Suryanarayan, Universal Religion, p 1-2, published from Mysore in 1952.) - The word Hindu may be as old as the Indus Valley Civilization. To find the meaning of ‘Hindu’ one ought to look at the term ‘Hindu Kush’ (killer of Hindus?/or Kush meaning the Biblical Ethiopian). Who were the people, who named this mountain range as Hindu Kush? Why these mountains were called the killers of Hindus? As I mentioned earlier, the Indian subcontinent was inhabited by dark complexioned people before the migration of Caucasian tribes from Caucasus. - The fair skinned Caucasian tribes who lived on the Northwest of Hindu Kush Mountain range called the Indian subcontinent as the land of Hindus (land of black people). The Northwest expansion of the inhabitants of Indus Valley was prevented by of Hindu Kush Mountains. Whenever the plain dwelling Hindus attempted to cross these mountains, they met death due harsh terrain and heavy snow. That is how these mountains were given the name Hindu Kush by mountain dwelling Caucasian tribes. - Hindu’ means black, he would have been hesitant to accept it, as the inferiority complex of ‘blackness’ is deeply imbedded in the psyche of Indians. Most Indians except the Dalits consider themselves as the descendents of Caucasian tribes, who ruled over India before the onslaught of Muslims. So for Hindus to accept that ‘Hindu’ means black would make them descendents of native Indians, who are black people That is why Hindus insist that ‘Hindu’ is the corrupted form of Sindhu [River]. Indians of today are the products of thousands of years of miscegenation between Caucasian groups and native Indians. - In Pashto, the language of the dominant Afghan tribe of Pashtoons, Hindu is pronounced as Indu (h is silent). The Greeks called the people of Indus Valley Indos or Indus and hence, the name India. The Muslims called it Hindustan. http://www.dalitstan.org/sol/hindu.html - Here's even more! - ‘ F. Willord states: ‘It is certain that very ancient statues of the Gods of India have crisp hair and the features of Negroes. Some have caps… Others indeed seem to have locked curled…But this will not account for the thick lips and the noses of the ancient images; nor can it be reasonably doubted that a race of Negroes formally had power and preeminence in India. In several parts of India the mountaineers still have resemblance to Negroes in the countenance and hair which is curled and has a tendency to wool.’ [Asiatick Researches, Vol. III, London]. - Child with Horus knot - "Bhrama,Vishnu and Shiva are revered as the Supreme Trinity of multitude of manifestations of Divinity. It is said that all that is true, all that is good and all that is beautiful is God (Satyam Shivam Sundaram). Shiva (Sanskrit for “auspicious one”) also called Siva, Shiva is referred to as 'the good one' or the 'auspicious one'. Shiva - Rudra is considered to be the destroyer of evil and sorrow. Shiva - Shankara is the doer of good. Shiva is 'tri netra' or three eyed, and is 'neela kantha' - blue necked (having consumed poison to save the world from destruction. Shiva - Nataraja is the Divine Cosmic Dancer. Shiva - Ardhanareeswara is both man and woman.". - 'The Vedas or Vedams are the sacred volume of the Hindoos...The date of these books is more than 25 centuries prior to our era; their contents prove that all reveries of the Greek metaphysicians come from India and Egypt.' Count Volney - Ruins of Empire p. 100. - '...the blacks, under their renowned leader Krishna, that is The Black, fought with valor, especially on the banks of the Jumna. - The Negro strain is apparent in the large masses of the Indian population, even in the North. there are any number of East Indians who are indistinguishable form Afro-American mulattoes. ' J.A. Rogers Sex and Race Vol. 1 p. 62-63 - The Black Buddah - Dvaravati Period in Thailand; ninth century. Photo courtesy of Larry Williams. From: The African Presence of Early Asia Page 239 - Here we have several religions and religious icons mentioned as having Black or African antecedents. - Khrisna -Usage: Indian, Hindu Mythology - Pronounced: KRISH-na Means "Black, Dark" in Sanskrit. This is the name of a Hindu god believed to be an incarnation of the god Vishnu. He was the youngest of King Vasudeva's eight children, six of whom were killed by King Kamsa because of a prophecy that a child of Vasudeva would kill Kamsa. Krishna however was saved and he eventually killed the king as well as performing many other great feats. - SHYAM m Usage: Indian, Hindu Mythology Derived from Sanskrit syama meaning "dark, black, blue". This is another name of the god Krishna in Hindu mythology. - Vishnu - VISHNU - Usage: Hindu Mythology Pronounced: VISH-noo Possibly means "all-pervasive" in Sanskrit. The Hindu god Vishnu is the protector and preserver of the universe. By some Hindus he is regarded as the supreme god. - Manu - The founder of the human race. Manu was saved by Brahma from a deluge. - Nidra - The black-skinned goddess that is clothed in yellow and dark blue silk. She is the sister of Vishnu. - Shiva - Usage: Indian, Hindu Mythology - Pronounced: SHEE-va Derived from Sanskrit Siva meaning "benign". Shiva is the Hindu god of destruction and restoration, the husband of the mother goddess Parvati. His aspect is usually terrifying, but it can also be gentle. - Kali -Usage: Hindu Mythology -Pronounced: KAH-lee Means "The Black One" in Sanskrit. In Hindu mythology Kali is the fierce destructive form of the wife of Shiva. She is also known as Kalikamata ("black earth-mother") and Kalaratri ("black night"). Among the Tamils she is known as Kottavei. Kali is worshipped particularly in Bengal. Her best known temples are in Kalighat and Dakshineshvara. - Black: Black in the ancient Hindu language of Sanskrit is kaala. The feminine form is Kali. Black is a symbol of The Infinite and the seed stage of all colors. - The original people of India were African. theses people that re now considered in the lowest caste and untouchable were those who made history and the progenitors of India culture. Those called by historians Eastern Ethiopians are our people who settled the Indus Valley. Our Indus Valley brothers were educated in the Mysteries of Egypt and Great Zimbabwe and spread civilization and culture to the East. |
INFORMATION
TAKEN FROM MY: AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORY E-BOOK: ©Copyright 2005 Antonio Mark McCoy Sr. - CHAPTER
#3.
Civilizations started by Blacks: First of all, considering that the founders of the many world religions on all Continents were "BLACK" Peoples with "woolly-type" hair, to include the earliest God's. Is evidence that all of these religions, then the cultures and/or civilizations were started by Blacks. Given that the Black Race is the oldest race, it should come to no surprise that the Black Race were the first to build civilizations. Historically Blacks have played the earliest civilizing role in the world as shown by the Kam in Ancient Egypt, Sumer, Babylon, Canaan, Kush (Ethiopia), the Indus Kush and Harrappa (in the Ancient India Indus Valley), the Olmec's (in Ancient Mexico and the America's) and the Xian in Ancient China. As far as Religious and God-like Figures; Buddha was Black, he had a wide nose, full-lips, and woolly hair. His hair was always shown in small tight curls and a corn rowed style. Early sculptures of him clearly reveal his Black Africanoid-type features. Buddha originated in India, where the darkest complected Indian Peoples existed (before the Aryan invasions displaced them all). Krishna of India also means the Black One! He is always portrayed with blue or blue-black skin. Mohammed, the founder of Islam was also 'bluish' in color with 'frizzy' hair. Moses was Black according to Mohammedan tradition and early portraits of him. Other Black religious and/or God-like figures were; Zaha of Japan, Fu-Hsi of China, Sommonacom of Siam, Isis of Egypt and then Rome, and Tyr of "Scandinavia". Amon/Amen/Amun-Ra, Ptah, Seth, and Horus, are all Black Egyptian God's. Osiris, one of the greatest of the Egyptian God's, name means "Lord of the Perfect Black." He was also called "The Great Black". The chief title of Zeus, the greatest of the Greek God's was "Ethiops", which means "burnt faced". Most of the Earliest Statues of God's in India have Africoid features and woolly hair. The name of the Mexican God "Ixtliton" means "blacked faced." In fact many of the Ancient Mexican God's are all portrayed with jet black skin and with Africoid features. Not to speak of the African Featured Olmec Stone Heads that were found throughout Mexico and Central America. Maybe these are the heads of their God-like figures? Legends
from
around
the
world,
from
Ireland
to
Japan
speak
of
the
earliest
inhabitants
of
their
land
as
being
"small
blacks"
or
"dark
dwarfs".
It
is
said
that
such
Black
Dwarfs
built
Stone
Henge
in
England
also.
The
original
Irish
"Leprechauns"
and
"Fairies"
were
in
fact
Black
Pygmies!
So
let's
now
take
a
look
of
some
of
the
evidence
that
proves
that
Blacks
are
the
founders
of
the
worlds
great
civilizations.
All
of
which
is
supported
by
legends,
fossil
records,
artifacts,
and
other
structures.
The
first
people
of
India
were
African's!
In
fact
the
word
India
itself
means
"Black".
But
of
course
we
can
easily
see
that
the
Indian
Peoples
origin
were
Black.
The
Latin
word
"India"
is
from
the
Greek
word
Indus
(or
Indos)
which
means
Black.
The
earliest
people of
India (often called
Dravidian's) were
Black
African's! It is believed that many of them came from Ethiopia. The
light-skinned
or White Indian Peoples are descendants of White invaders of India. The
Aryan's who invaded India and the Indus Valley, committed genocide
against
the Black Peoples there, enslaved the survivors, and attempted to erase
their African heritage through genetic mixing. Around
1500
B.C.
the
Rigvedic
Aryan
Invasion
of
India
consisted
of
the
annihilation
of
the
Semito-Negroid
(Sudra-Panian)
Indus
Valley
Civilization
by
the
Aryan
Hordes
of
Indra,
and
the
slaughter
of
5
million
of
its
inhabitants.
The
Indus
irrigation
system
was
shattered
to
permanently
destroy
agriculture
in
the
region
while
Sudroid
Negroid's
were
displaced
from
all
of
North
India.
Then around 1400 B.C. the Second Aryan Invasion was from Afghanistan, which conquered much of the upper Ganges valley. The Third Aryan Invasion occurred around 1200 BC, Western India (Gujarat, Rajastan etc.) was invaded. The Aryan's then established a capital there, naming it Dwarka. They then destroyed the surviving traces of the Indus Valley civilization, abducting and raping 16,000 women of the Negroid Races they attempted to exterminated. Survivals of these acts are found in the "Krishna-gopi Songs". The Fourth Aryan Invasion occurred between 900 and 800 B.C. This Digvijay Aryan invasion led to the enslavement of all of India. Then a major revolt, which was lead by the Negroid's and mixed race, led to the terrible Mahabharatan War. An Aryan victory enabled them to invade and settle in the Ganges Valley, which confirmed their Aryan dominance in that region. The genocide's committed in this war permanently changed the racial composition of India. The
Fifth
Aryan
invasion
occurred
around
800
B.C.
From
the
Caspian
they
swept
down into
India, driving the preceding
peoples
before them, and exterminating various Negroid Aboriginal Races. The
Ramaite
Aryan Invasion and Dravidian Holocaust occurred around 600 B.C. After
the
invasion the Apartheid Varna System was imposed, and most of the
Negroid
Dravidian's were exterminated.
The
Buddhist
Aryan
Invasion
occurred
around
260
B.C.
During
this
invasion
200,000
Negroid
Aboriginal's
were
killed
and
countless
more
enslaved.
Several
wars
with
the
Negroid
Aboriginal
Races
were
waged
by
the
evil
Aryan's.
The
Aryanised
religions
of
Jainism
and
Buddhism
invaded
South
India,
the
Aryan
Sinhalese
Buddhists
invaded
from
East
India,
and
they
exterminated
the
entire
population
of
native
Negroid
Dravidoids. Another invasion
occurred around 250
A.D.
when the Samudra Gupta of the Gupta dynasty
in
Aryavarta
invaded
south
India
and
conquered
several
non-Aryan
nations. Between
1336
to
1646
A.D.
the
Vijayanagaran
Aryan
Invasion
occurred.
The
semi-
Aryanized
Andhras
systematically
exterminated
the
Dravidian
Races.
Dravidian
Sudra
Negro's
were
shot
on
sight.
Around
1612
the
British
(who
are
largely
Aryan
in
descent)
began
their
conquest
of
India.
Further
proof
of
the
conquest
of
the
India
and
the
Indus
Valley
is
the
Indian
Peoples
themselves.
They
are
naturally
considered
to
be
Caucasians,
but
their
skin
pigment
is
dark
like
that
of
the
Africans.
This
is
clearly
evidence
of
racial
mixing
of
a
peoples
and
how
the
peoples
of
India
inherited
their
European
features.
After
each
of
these
invasions
the
Cast
System
was
inforced.
NOW EXACTLY WHO WERE THE "ARYANS"? THEY OF WHOM WERE "ORIGINALLY" FROM THE "SUM-ARYANS". - SUMER AND THE SUMERIAN'S/SUM-ARYAN'S:
-BY ANTONIO MARK MCCOY SR. - 2013 THE "RISE" OF "SUMER" BEGAN SOON AFTER THE "FALL" OF NIMROD'S "BABYLON". IN FACT. "SUMER" WOULD OF HAD "NEVER" RISEN. IF IT WASN'T FOR THE "FALL" OF NIMROD'S BABYLON PRIOR. NIMROD'S BABYLON THAT CAME AFTER THE GREAT FLOOD OF HIS GRANDFATHER "NOAH". BUT BEFORE THAT OF "SUMER" THOUGH. NIMROD'S BABYLON THAT WAS MOSTLY MADE-UP OF HAMITE (IN THE FORM OF HIS INVADING CUSHITES) AND SHEMITE (THE INVADED PEOPLES THERE) PEOPLES. THE "CUSHITE'S" OF "NIMRODS" KINGDOM OF BABYLON. AND THE "SHEMITES" OF BABYLON. WHO WERE UNDER NIMROD'S BABYLONIAN RULE THEN OF COURSE. WERE "ALL" LATER "SCATTERED" AROUND THE WORLD. TO THE "FOUR CORNERS OF THE EARTH" THEN. INCLUDING TO "AMEXUM" (NORTH AMERICA) AFTER THE "DESTRUCTION" OF THE "TOWER OF "BABYLON" IN 4,288 B.C. BY "GOD" OR BY THE "GODS". AND !THAT WHICH HAD LEFT THE REGION OF BABYLON. "WIDE-OPEN" FOR CONQUEST THERE-AFTER. AS THE "JAPHETHIAN TRIBES" ("INDO-SCYTHIAN'S") FROM THE NORTH TOOK IT OVER THEN-AFTER. !THEY OF WHOM COULD OF HAD "NEVER" CONQUEST NIMROD'S BABYLON PRIOR. BECAUSE THE CUSHITE ARMIES OF NIMROD WERE "TOO POWERFUL" FOR THE SCYTHIAN'S THEN. AND NOT EVEN THE "SCYTHIAN'S" WANTED TO FACE THEM THEN. THE LATER CONQUESTING "SCYTHIAN'S" OF WHOM. BECAME THE "SUMERIAN'S" AND THE "SUM-ARYANS". AND THAT BEING HOW THEY LATER TOOK ON THE NAME THE "SUM-ARYAN'S". THE NAME "SUM-ARYAN'S" MEANING THE "ARYAN'S OF THE LAND OF SUMER". - NOW ALLOW ME TO EXPLAIN SOMETHING TO YOU HERE. THE NIMROD BABYLONIAN'S, AND THE LATER SUMERIAN'S. OFTEN GET "INTEGRATED" BY HISTORICAL RESEARCHERS. MANY ALLEGED HISTORICAL RESEARCHERS WHO "FAIL" TO SEE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE 2 CULTURES. BOTH CULTURES THAT HAD STARTED IN THE EXACT SAME REGION. AND THAT REGION BEING "BABYLON" (WHICH IS IRAN AND IRAQ TODAY). SOME BLACK HISTORICAL RESEARCHERS WHO BELIEVE THAT THE ORIGINAL AND FIRST "SUMERIANS" WERE OF THE "BLACK" RACE. !BECAUSE THEY OF WHOM ARE "CONFUSED" BETWEEN THE TWO CULTURES. THAT'S WHY. !THEY OF WHOM ARE REFERRING TO THE PREVIOUS NIMROD BABYLON CULTURE AS BEING "BLACK". THINKING OF "THAT" TO HAVE BEEN "SUMER" THAT CAME LATER. OTHERS WHO SUGGEST HOW THE "SUMERIANS" HAD "SUDDENLY" APPEARED IN HISTORY. FROM VIRTUALLY "OUT OF NOWHERE". THEY TOO WHO ARE "CONFUSED". "CONFUSED" OF WHO THE EXACT PEOPLES WERE "BEFORE" THEY WERE CALLED THE "SUMERIAN'S". AND ALSO. ALL OF THESE "ALLEGED" HISTORICAL RESEARCHERS. !FAIL TO READ THE GOD DAMN "BIBLE". DON'T THEY? THE BIBLE THAT "CLEARLY" GIVES THE HINT TO WHAT HAD "ENDED" THE NIMROD RULED BABYLON. AND BEGAN SUMER THERE-AFTER. !DUH. IT'S ALL IN THE "BIBLE". !DUH. - NOW ALLOW ME TO ADD. THE "SUM-ARYAN'S" WHO ORIGINATED IN OLD BABYLON. WHO WERE THE "JAPHETHIAN TRIBES" ("INDO-SCYTHIAN'S") FROM THE NORTH. THEY OF WHOM TOOK IT OVER THEN. AS I HAD SAID EARLIER. THE AREA WHICH WAS IRAQ AND IRAN IN THOSE TIMES. !THEY OF WHOM WERE THE ANCESTORS OF THE LATER "ARYAN'S" WHO MOVED EAST INTO ASIA THEN-AFTER. AND !THEM ALSO BEING THE ORIGIN OF THE "ARYAN'S" AND THE "INDO-ARYAN'S". THEN LATTER GROUPS OF "SUM-ARYAN'S" MOVED ELSEWHERE INTO NORTHERN AFRICA. ALL THE WAY TO "MALI". THERE BEING DIRECT DESCENDANTS OF THE ORIGINAL SUM-ARYAN'S IN MALI TODAY. WHO ARE MEMBERS OF THE FAMED "DOGON TRIBE", AND OF OTHER MALIAN TRIBES. - MALIAN TRIBES OF PEOPLES BEING BLACK AFRICAN SUMERIAN DESCENDANTS THEY CALL THEMSELVES. AND "NOT" "SUM-ARYAN'S". THE ORIGINAL "SUM-ARYAN'S" FROM OLD BABYLON. WHO'S GENERATIONS BECAME "DILUTED" VIA THE MATING WITH VARIOUS OTHER TRIBES OF PEOPLES THEN-AFTER THEIR "TAKE-OVER" OF BABYLON. AND HERE IS HOW BLACK AFRICAN MALIANS ARE DESCENDANTS. IN ASIA. VARIOUS PEOPLES ARE "SUM-ARYAN DESCENDANTS. FROM IRAQ AND IRAN. ALL THE WAY TO INDIA, TIBET, AND CHINA. IN SUMMARY. HERE'S WHERE THE "BLACK NORTHERN AFRICAN CAUCASIAN", THE "MIXED-RACE MIDDLE EASTERN CAUCASIAN", THE "SOUTH EAST ASIAN CAUCASIAN", AND THE "CHINESE AND EAST ASIAN CAUCASIAN" LOOKS ORIGINATED FROM. !THEY TOO WHO ARE "CAUCASIAN'S" TODAY. - THOSE PEOPLES THEN OF WHO WERE JAPHETHIAN DESCENDANTS. AND WERE ORIGINALLY (BEFORE THEIR MIGRATION INTO BABYLON) "INDO-SCYTHIAN'S" THEN. THEY OF WHOM MIGRATED "EAST". AND NOT "WEST". !FALSE GERMAN HISTORIAN'S TODAY. AS WELL IN "ADOLPH HITLERS" TIMES. WHO HAD PURPOSELY LEAD THE WORLD TO BELIEVE THAT THE GERMANIC PEOPLES WERE OF "ARYAN" DESCENDANCY. WHEN IN REALITY. THEY "WERE !NOT". AND ARE INSTEAD THE COUSINS OF THE EUROPEAN JEWS IN ISRAEL TODAY. AND ARE "ASHKENAZ". AND THE JEWS BEING "ASHKENAZI". BOTH BEING FROM THE JAPHETHIC TRIBES OF "ASHCHENAZ" AND "TOGARMAH". THE "JAPHETHIAN TRIBES" THAT WERE MERELY THE "INVADERS" OF OTHER TRIBAL LANDS. BECAUSE THEY WERE OF THE "EVIL" AND "LUSTFUL" GENETIC "CRO-MAGNON" RACE. !THEY OF WHICH WAS THE GENETIC "CAUCASIAN" RACE ALSO. !THEY OF WHO WERE ALSO THE "INVADERS" OF OTHER LANDS THAT WEREN'T THEIRS IN THEIR TIMES. AND !THAT BEING THE TRUE NATURE OF THE "CAUCASIAN'S" THROUGHOUT HISTORY. ISN'T IT? BECAUSE SINCE THE !GREAT FLOOD OF NOAH. THE "CAUCASIAN'S" HAVE DONE NOTHING BUT "INVADE" AND "TAKE" THE LANDS OF OTHERS. !THEM OUT TO STEAL AWAY BLACK LANDS MOSTLY THEN. AND TO ALSO "COVER-UP" OUR HISTORY. WHICH HAS BEEN THEIR OBJECTIVE SINCE THE GREAT FLOOD. AS PER MY BIBLICAL INVASION DIAGRAM HERE BELOW. AS YOU CAN SEE. THE "GAULS" THAT CAME FROM THE EAST, AND MOVED ALL THE WAY WEST TO FRANCE. OR WHAT WAS "FRANCE" THEN. !THEM "NOT" BEING CALLED THE "GAULS" OR THE "GAULIC TRIBES" LONG BEFORE 1300 B.C. AND AS YOU CAN ALSO SEE. THE "WHITE HITTITES" (AS I CALL THEM). THAT INVADED AND TOOK THE ARABIAN PENINSULA. THE FIRST HITTITES BEFORE THEM (BEFORE 1595 B.C.) WHO WERE OF THE "HAMITIC" AND THE "SEMITIC" TRIBES. AND WERE "NOT" OF THE "JAPHETHIAN TRIBES". AS YOU CAN SEE ALSO. THE "HYKSOS" OR "SHEPARD KINGS". WHO WERE ALSO OF WHITE "JAPHETHIAN TRIBES". !BUT WERE ALSO A MIXTURE OF HAMITIC AND SEMITIC TRIBES THOUGH. BY THE TIME OF 1593 B.C. THEY WERE. THEM AT FIRST BEING PRIMARILY A "SEMITIC" TRIBAL RACE THOUGH. BUT WERE LATER "DILUTED" BY MANY OTHER TRIBES. AND AS YOU CAN ALSO SEE. THE "SCYTHIAN'S" THAT WERE THE "MOST SUCCESSFUL" WHITE "JAPHETHIAN TRIBE/S". THEY OF WHOM HAD ALSO CONTRIBUTED TO THE CHINESE "XIEH" MONGOLIAN TRIBE/S THAT HAD "GIVEN-RISE" TO THE "SHANG-YIN". THE FIRST CHINESE "MONGOLIAN" DYNASTY. - - THE
"SHANG-YIN"
BEING THE FIRST "WHITE RACE ASIAN'S" THAT HAD "TAKEN
POWER" IN ANCIENT CHINA. THE PREVIOUS "BLACK" XIAN DYNASTY (IT
BEING
THE
VERY
FIRST
CHINESE
DYNASTY)
IN CHINA. THAT WERE OF BLACK AND OF BROWN ASIAN RACE PEOPLES. AND OF
BLACK "EGYPTIAN" PEOPLES ALSO. THE "ORIGINAL GENETICALLY CREATED
ASIAN'S". THAT CAME LONG BEFORE THAT TIME. WHO WERE BLACK AND BROWN
"MOSTLY". AND A "NON-MONGOLIAN RACE" OF PEOPLES. THEY OF WHO WERE MORE
OR SO LIKE TODAY'S "DARKER-SKINNED" SOUTH EAST ASIAN AND INDIAN
ASIAN'S. THE ORIGINAL SOUTH EAST ASIA AND INDIAN ASIAN BLACK AND BROWN
(DARKER-SKINNED) FOLKS. THAT STILL EXIST TO THIS VERY DAY. THE CHINESE
WHITE MONGOLIAN TYPE ASIAN'S. THAT HAD "INVADED" THEIR ASIAN LANDS FROM
1750 B.C. AND AFTER. THEN EITHER "ASSIMILATING" OR "MIXING" WITH THE
ORIGINAL ASIAN TRIBES THERE. !THROUGHOUT ASIA THEY DID. GIVING US. THE
"COMPLEX" ASIAN MIXTURE OF PEOPLES TODAY. !ASIA INDEED BEING !VERY
!VERY COMPLEXED IN RACIAL MIXTURE BECAUSE OF SUCH. FROM THE COUNTRY OF
"IRAN". ALL THE WAY TO THE COUNTRY OF "JAPAN". BEING THE REMNANTS OF
THE ANCIENT ASIAN PEOPLES. IT BEING A STORY THAT "FEW" "FEW" HISTORIANS
CAN TELL ABOUT. OTHER THAN "MYSELF" YOU SEE.
- I OF WHOM HAVE "ALSO". LONG-SINCE KNOWN. THAT THE XIA/XI BLACK PEOPLES WERE ORIGINALLY FROM THE NOW SUNKEN CONTINENT OF MU AND FROM LEMURIA. HAD MIGRATED TO AFRICA, TO BABYLON, TO IRAN, AND TO INDIA. BUT ALSO TO SOUTHERN CHINA. TO SOUTH EAST ASIA. AND TO "ATLANTIS". SOME OF THEM MIGRATING INTO CHINA AROUND 2800 B.C. AND ESTABLISHING THE FIRST CHINESE DYNASTY IN 2205 B.C. THEY OF WHOM WERE THE FIRST CHINESE DYNASTY. SO IT'S "WRITTEN". THEY OF WHOM HAD BUILT THE CITY OF XIAN THAT'S NAMED AFTER THEM. AND THE XIAN PYRAMIDS. THE XI PEOPLES WHO WERE ALSO "EXACTLY" LIKE THE EGYPTIAN'S WERE IN RELIGION. AND IN MANY MANY OTHER WAYS. JUST LIKE THEIR OLMA/OLMEC XI COUSINS WERE IN CENTRAL AMERICA. BECAUSE MANY OF THEM WERE DESCENDANTS OF "EGYPTIAN'S". THE BLACK XI PEOPLES IN CHINA WHO'S "PYRAMIDS" THAT WERE BUILT TO ALIGN WITH THE STAR CONSTELLATION OF "ORION". JUST LIKE THE EGYPTIAN PYRAMIDS WERE MANY THOUSANDS OF YEARS PRIOR. BECAUSE THEY WERE THE SAME PEOPLES. THE XI PEOPLES WHO WERE MERELY EGYPTIAN DESCENDANTS. I SAY AGAIN HERE. - THE XI
PEOPLES WHO WERE
MERELY
EGYPTIAN DESCENDANTS BACK THEN. I SAY AGAIN HERE. THEM THEN BECOMING THE "LI MIN" LATER.
THEN AROUND 1675 B.C. THEY
BECAME THE "SHANG-LI" OR "BLACK SHANGS". THEN AFTER THEIR DOWN-FALL VIA
WAR AGAINST OTHER MONGOLIAN CHINESE TRIBE (THE SHANG-YIN) OF PEOPLES.
MANY OF THEM
MOVED OR MIGRATED NORTH. "JOINING" THE "XIONGNU" IN PRE-MONGOLIA THERE.
- THE "WAR-LIKE" XIONGNU PEOPLES WHO'S HISTORY AND D.N.A. SHOWS TO HAD BEEN A COMBINATION OF PEOPLES. THEM BEING; INDO-EUROPEAN (PROTO-TURKS AND PROTO-IRANIAN'S), SAKA-SCYTIAN'S, AND "SOME" XIA PEOPLES. THE VERY NAME "XIONGNU" BEING TAKING FROM THE NAME "XIAN" OR "XI" OR "XIA". !YET HISTORIAN'S "STUPIDLY" "FAIL" TO GIVE THE ORIGIN OF "XIONGNU" AND "XIAN" CONNECTION. WITHOUT A DOUBT THE XI PEOPLES MIGRATED NORTH INTO WHAT IS TODAY MONGOLIAN TERRITORY. !THAT BEING VERY VERY OBVIOUS. THE XIONGNU THAT WERE INDEED A "MIXED-RACE" OF NON-MONGOLIAN PEOPLES. THE XIONGNU WHO "WERE NOT" THE SAME AS THE PROTO-MONGOLIAN PEOPLES THE "XIANBEI/XIEH". THE XI ONGNU WHO HAD "ASSEMBLED" WHERE MONGOLIA IS TODAY. THE DIFFERENT TRIBES THAT MADE-UP THE XIONGNU OF WHOM. HAD MIGRATED FROM THE NORTH, THE SOUTH, THE EAST, AND THE WEST. AND ONE "CANNOT" GIVE THEIR ANCIENT "TRIBE OF PEOPLES" A DISTINCT "RACIAL" IDENTITY. - -
AS I HAD SAID PRIOR; "IN "AFGHANISTAN". ANCIENT EGYPTIAN'S WERE IN THE AREA WHERE THE "MES AYNAK" RUINS ARE. !THERE WHERE THERE'S AN "ANCIENT COPPER MINE" EXISTS. !YES. ANCIENT EGYPTIAN'S WHO WERE "MINING" COPPER THERE. !THERE ALSO WHERE INDIAN MINERS EXISTED AT THE SAME TIME. !YES. BECAUSE BOTH "EGYPTIAN" AND "INDIAN" MINERS HAD "COEXISTED" THEN. "EXACTLY" LIKE IN THE "GRAND CANYON" THEY DID. BECAUSE THEY WERE "COUSINS". AS ALSO PROVEN BY "DNA". THE "MINING" THAT HAD "PROBABLY" OCCURED DURING THE "GANDHARA EMPIRE" (FROM "1,500 B.C. TO 500 B.C.")? AND THE ANCIENT SITE THAT'S AT LEAST "3,000 YEARS OLD". THE ANCIENT SITES THAT ALSO HAVE "PYRAMIDS". !OR THEY WERE "PYRAMID-CARVED MOUNTAIN-TOPS? WHICH WAS THE EXACT SAME THING MY ANCIENT ANCESTORS HAD ALSO DONE IN THE "GRAND CANYON"." |
UNDERWORLD: The HOLLOW EARTH INVESTIGATORS: They claimed that the mummies wore armbands, and were holding golden spears. Included in other artifacts they described were giant statues. The source of light for the underground city, they claimed that they discovered, was an ingenious system fueled by subterranean gases. As they allegedly followed the tunnels and caverns upward toward the eastern slope of the mountains, they speculated that the ancient city likely was underwater centuries ago, which might explain the arched structures that appeared to be quays that they thought were docks for vessels. Lee reports in his book that the two explorers retrieved some of the treasures from the site, and attempted to market them to scientists they thought were associated with the Smithsonian Institution. But the artifacts were apparently stolen and the two men were never heard from ever again. It would seem that someone did not want Bill and Jack's little secret to get-out, and the two men probably were murdered to keep it a secret. Then in 1946, more than a decade after Lee wrote of the Death Valley tale, Dr. F Bruce Russell claimed to have found a similar underground civilization beneath Death Valley in 1931, the year before Lee's book was published. He also reported finding eight-foot-tall mummies beneath the mountains, and described artifacts of Egyptian and American Indian design. Dr. Russell and a group of
investors reportedly formed an enterprise called "Amazing Explorations,
Inc" to profit from artifacts they found in the caverns. Russell and
his
colleagues also couldn't find the entranced to the caverns again, and
soon thereafter, his car was found broken down and abandoned in Death
Valley.
Russell's suitcase was in the car, but his body was never found. It
would
seem that he had a similar demise. !Listen, it's like this, the aliens
underneath our surface do not want word to get out that there down
there,
so them and their collaborators within our governments has done what
they
had to do to keep it a secret. The Paihute Indian's knew about and
underground
civilization in this valley long ago. They also knew that peoples
ventured
into it never to return, so they called it "The Valley of Death", and
that's
where the name "Death Valley" originated from.
|
http://io9.com/5875252/when-the-smithsonian-discovered-an-ancient-egyptian-colony-in-the-grand-canyonWhen the Smithsonian discovered an ancient Egyptian colony in the Grand CanyonDid
Egyptians
cross
the
Pacific
Ocean
and
wander
the
American
Southwest
thousands
of
years
ago?
In
the
early
20th
century,
claims
of
such
a
discovery
were
made
by
two
Smithsonian-funded
archaeologists,
who
spoke
of
a
thriving
civilization
tucked
within
a
series
of
caverns
carved
into
the
side
of
a
remote
portion
of
the
Grand
Canyon.
What
did
the
archaeologists
find?
What
evidence
did
they
bring
back?
A
story
on
the
front
page
of
the
April
5,
1909
edition
of
the Arizona
Gazette recounted
the discovery of a series of bizarre caves and artifacts in the Marble
Canyon region of the Grand Canyon. The report claimed two
Smithsonian-funded archaeologists, Prof. S. A. Jordan and G.E. Kinkaid,
are responsible for the find. As the article noted:
|
http://paranormal.about.com/od/ancientanomalies/a/History-Mystery-Ancients-In-America_2.htm In 1914, archaeologist M.A. Gonzales was excavating some Mayan ruins in the city of Acajutla, Mexico when he was surprised by the discovery of two statuettes that were clearly Egyptian. One male and one female, the carvings bore ancient Egyptian dress and cartouches. They are thought to depict Osiris and Isis. |
https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/ancient-pyramid-discovered-in-the-caribbean-566682991.html - Ancient Pyramid Discovered in the Caribbean TORONTO
/CNW/ – Amateur archaeologist Raymond Julien finds an Egyptian-style
pyramid sticking out of the ocean. The island pyramid is covered in
tropical trees and lava. The trees covering the island reveal the shape
of something hidden underneath, resembling the outline of a pyramid
with 40 degree angles on each side. Having visited the island last
March, the pyramid is colossal and sticks out of the ocean like the top
of a giant obelisk. It doesn’t follow the pattern of rolling hills like
the rest of the nearby landscape. “It’s an oddity, to say the least.
Mother Nature doesn’t make volcanic islands in the shape of pyramids,”
said Julien.
- In my opinion, this is evidence of the lost civilization of Atlantis. It falls into place with all the mythology about Atlantis. First, there is evidence of volcanic activity. This fits with the philosopher Plato’s story of Atlantis’ destruction by volcanic eruption and earthquakes.Plato also said that Atlantis was beyond the Pillar of Hercules and was over 9000 years before his time. In this case, the Pillar of Hercules is the Strait of Gilbraltar and beyond that is the Atlantic Ocean. The best evidence of all is the fact that the pyramid is half submerged in the Atlantic ocean, making it at least 12,500 years old. Evidently, the pyramid was once above water, prior to the last ice age meltdown around 12,500 years ago. No other existing civilization 12,500 years ago fills the gap in history, except one: Atlantis! - I’m really looking for some kind of corporate funding, sponsorships or donations. The visual evidence alone is worth further investigating as this could be a truly tremendous find. We don’t have to spend millions of dollars in underwater equipment to get access to the deep ocean depths to look for traces of Atlantis as it is now more accessible with this discovery. This was probably one of the ancient high grounds of the lost continent of Atlantis that is still partially sticking out of the ocean and for that reason, a lot more accessible to excavate without all of the costly funding required for underwater equipment. - The pyramid is called Sugarloaf Island and is situated on the northern tip of Grenada in the Caribbean. - SOURCE Raymond Julien |
The
cluster of mounds known as the
Bessemer Site was the largest indigenous mound site in what is now
Jefferson County, and it once dominated a large territory in what
became north-central Alabama. Occupied from about AD 1150 to 1250
during the early Mississippian period, the site included three mounds
near the confluence of Halls Mill Creek and Valley Creek west of
Downtown Bessemer. In the 1930s, archaeologists completely
excavated all three mounds, so no above-ground evidence of them
remains. These mounds included a “domiciliary” (residential)
mound, a small burial mound, and a large ceremonial mound. The
two-tiered ceremonial mound was built atop an unusual stone foundation
that is rarely seen associated with mounds in the Southeast.
Other unique features included preserved stair-steps on the domiciliary
mound and the remnants of a double-walled palisade encircling the
burial mound. Beneath the mounds, archaeologists also discovered
the remains of buildings and other structures that pre-dated
construction of the mounds. During the mounds’ occupation, an active village surrounded the site where people lived in rectangular wattle and daub houses with thatched roofs. In the bottomlands along Valley Creek beyond the mound center, members of this community cultivated important food crops such as corn, beans, squash, amaranth, and sunflower, and supplemented these crops by gathering fruits and nuts, hunting game, and fishing. The Bessemer Site has played an important and changing role in the interpretation of Mississippian cultural developments in central Alabama. Early studies of pottery from the site suggested a close association with the Moundville Chiefdom, which is located 75 miles downstream along the Black Warrior River. However, a more recent and better understanding of Mississippian ceramics indicates that the Bessemer Site was actually the center of a separate chiefdom that was similar to Moundville, but distinct from it. This site is very important to numerous Southeastern indigenous tribes who assert an ancestral connection with those who built and occupied Alabama’s ancient mounds. The earthwork landscapes and the objects and information recovered from them reveal a rich cultural tradition that still thrives today among these tribes. Our indigenous mound sites represent a heritage for all Alabamians to cherish, and it is important that we protect and preserve them for future generations. NOTE THAT THESE MOUNDS THAT NO LONGER EXIST. !BECAUSE THE "WHITE PEOPLES" THAT HAD "BLACK PEOPLES" DESTROYED THEM LONG AGO, IN THE "1930'S" THEN. AS !SO SHOWN HERE !BELOW:
The Bessemer Site, also known as the Talley Mounds and the Jonesboro Mounds, is a South Appalachian Mississippian culture archaeological site located near the confluence of Halls Mill Creek and Valley Creek (a tributary of the Black Warrior River), west of downtown Bessemer in Jefferson County, Alabama. The site was occupied in the early Mississippian period from about 1150 to 1250. |
As the Negroid Skull is rounder. So they know that a Negroid
Peoples
were buried in such Mounds. And they deny it. The Mongoloid Peoples of
the world. With the exception of the Asian Mongoloids. Never said that
they built the Pyramids. And this was very evident in South and Central
America. Because when the Spanish asked them who constructed such
things,
they replied how they did not know. Then many of them took credit for
them
later.
These Black Peoples fought to preserve their great cities
and great
accomplishments. As well as their land and their freedom. But
eventually
lost it all to the greedy and murderous White Europeans. Who took their
land, destroyed their Pyramids and Mounds (all but a few of them), then
murdered them in the process. Then once that was all said and done, to
add insult to injury, they attempted to wipe-away their very existence.
Attempting to wipe- away their history.
The name Mississippi comes from the French "Messipi" - the French rendering of the native American Anishinaabe (Ojibwe or Algonquin) name for the river, "Misi-ziibi," meaning "Great River."
AS "I"
QUOTE
WHAT
OTHER'S
HAD
SAID
ABOUT
IT
HERE:
- "The Big Apple of the 14th Century" by National Geographic, Moundville Archaeological Park was once the site of a powerful prehistoric community that, at its peak, was America’s largest city north of Mexico. -
-
The Moundville site, occupied from around A.D. 1000 until A.D. 1450, is a large Mississippian culture settlement situated on the Black Warrior River in central Alabama. At the time of Moundville’s heaviest residential population, the community took the form of a three hundred-acre city built on a bluff overlooking the river. - The Moundville site is a Mississippian Era mound complex that reached its zenith in A.D. 1200. It is considered to be one of the most important archaeological sites in America. The
earthen
mounds
which
give
the
site
its
modern
name
were
built
by
an
unknown
tribe
associated
with
the
Mississippian
Culture. The ancient name of the city is unknown.
Moundville is the second largest "mound builder" site preserved in the
USA after Cahokia in Illinois and is often compared with it but the two
were significantly different in many ways. One of the major differences
between them is that the elite of the Moundville people lived and
buried their dead on the mounds they created as a matter of course
while, at Cahokia, only some mounds were used as graves or to support
residences.
- To early-nineteenth-century Anglo-American settlers, the earthen mounds they encountered along the Black Warrior River and other Alabama waterways presented a tantalizing mystery. Some speculated about a vanished race of "Mound Builders;" others, more biblically grounded, wondered if they were a testament to the "Lost Tribes of Israel." Most found it hard to associate them in any way with the dispirited native tribesmen around them, glumly awaiting their forced exile to the West. Moundville, Alabama's Ancient Indian Mounds Led Souls to the Stars. Archaeoastronomy
evaluation at the Moundville, Alabama Native American Indian Mound
Complex shows alignments to the constellations of Cygnus and Orion 800
years ago. For hundreds of years it has been recognized
that the placement of mounds and earthworks was not random but involved
topographical/geographical factors and other, then unknown, purposes.
The Path of Souls alignments clearly show that many features at such
ancient sites were purposely arranged to create alignments with the
stars involved in the death ritual. It
came to light that Moundville was once a vast compound, a fortified
town, and consisted of an assortment of houses and fields, a center for
religious ceremonies, and a large graveyard. The mounds themselves were
used for civic and sacred purposes and for the homes of nobles.
- The Mississippian religion was polytheistic and centered on the belief in a spirit world that governed the physical world. Shamans played an important role in communicating with the spirit world and performing rituals to ensure successful crops and hunting. They also performed sacrifices, including human sacrifices, to appease the spirits. - Mississippian culture left a powerful legacy on the southeastern United States, including the namesake state of Mississippi. In addition to their stunning architectural achievements, they developed a vast trading network and widespread agricultural practices. - The legacy of the Mississippian Indians is undeniable, influencing history, art, architecture, and culture for generations to come. By recognizing their contributions and understanding their complex society, we can learn from their culture and integrate their traditions into our modern-day society. Through education and preservation, we can ensure that their memory lives on and their rich cultural heritage remains intact. |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motillas# The motillas were the first attested settlement of La Mancha (Spain), which took place in the Middle Bronze Age by people belonging to the culture of Bronze of Levante. The motillas are human-made hills atop of which are placed fortified settlements. Most of the sites of this culture belong to this category. Only a few sites in the skirts of Sierra Morena make an exception, being these fortified towns of larger size. Their height is usually between four and five meters and the motillas are separated from each other by a distance of four or five kilometers. The motillas were created as a consequence of the destruction of fortified enclaves that existed from c. 2200 BCE to c. 1500 BCE and were used as a control center of the resources the place offered; the motillas were thus erected c. 1500 BCE and abandoned c. 1300 BCE, coincident with the end of the Argarian civilization. The motillas were first believed to be antique burial mounds. However, this theory was ruled out when an excavation at the Motilla de Azuer that took place in the seventies proved their defensive and management faculties. This way, a wide area could be controlled easily. |
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_suppressedearthhistory02.htm There are mysterious prehistoric towers called motillas in Spain, which consist of a conical tower in an enclosure. One was excavated in 1947 and metalwork dated to the middle Bronze Age was found. - The Bower chronicle says that the followers of Scota settled for a while in Spain and built,
Numerous Egyptian
artifacts have been found in Spain, dating from the Third Dynasty (well
before the time of Akhenaten and the supposed flight of
Meritaten), indicating long-established links between Egypt and
Spain. (However, as far as I can see the author does not claim that
Egyptian artifacts have been found at motilla sites).
|
https://www.vanguardngr.com/2014/08/igbo-originate/
-
- Where did Igbo originate from? - * The biblical connection - BY VINCENT UJUMADU THERE is a debate over the origin of Igbo. Two Anambra communities – Nri in Anaocha local government area and Aguleri in Anambra East local government area claim the Igbo originated from their areas. - It was Eze Obidiegwu Onyesoh, the traditional ruler of Nri, who started the argument when he said his community is the origin of Igbo. Shortly after, Aguleri debunked it, saying Onyeso ought to know the truth because he had to visit Aguleri before his coronation in 1988 to receive blessing as Igbo custom demanded of him. According to Aguleri people, Aguleri is the first son of Eri who migrated from Egypt. But
Onyesoh
would
not
accept
that
as
he insisted that his community is the
first home of the Igbo before they migrated to other areas and
even beyond the shores of eastern Nigeria.
-
- His words: The origin of Nri is Egypt about two centuries ago and the father of Nri was called Gad. Gad was the son of Jacob while Jacob was the son of Isaac and Isaac was the son of Abraham. The family tree of Nri was traced from the origin of Abraham who was the favourite child of God. - A man called Eri, the progenitor of Ndigbo, lived in Egypt and was the special adviser on religious matters to the 5th dynasty of Pharaohs of Egypt. - It was in those days in Egypt that Eri determined who was going to be the next Pharaoh. And by their law, there was a deity called Emem and anything to happen during the time, the man called Eri, in his capacity as the religion adviser to the Pharaoh of Egypt, was responsible. - Now Eri needed people to help him and he recruited devotees. These devotees were all appointed by him but he had to do something to really found their own loyalty. In their movement towards southern side, they arrived another confluence. This confluence was the tributary of River Niger and Benue known as Ezu na Omambala. - The last son of Eri, Agulu remained by the sea side because he was a fisherman. The first child Eri remained in his father’s house until he had a vision and was called to serve God in their own way. Nri was an incarnate to his grandfather, Eri. - So Nri was the reincarnate of Eri, and the functions which their grandfather performed came back to him. While his siblings all left to their respective farming positions, he remained in his father’s compound. The Ofo Ndigbo resides at Nri because the process is from one Eze-Nri to another. There is a handover known as Ofo and Alo and to become Eze-Nri without original Ofo and Alo, you are not Eze Nri. The Ofo and Alo have been existing for the past 1,009 years. When I finish and gone as the Eze Nri, the Ofo and Alo will be handed to the next Eze-Nri. - Today, about 180 communities could trace their origin from Nri and the civilization of Nri spread around. He founded the Ozo title just like his father did; he spoke about anything that has to do with fairness and justice. Everywhere he founded was on behalf of his grandfather and they called themselves, Igbo. - He added: Aguleri, the last born of Eri, remained at the very close of the water front. Aguleri cannot claim that Nri came from Aguleri. Nri came from a place called Eriaka and, for now, Eriaka has gone defunct because the main man left Eriaka. - Eze Nri, Onyesoh said, doesn t go to Aguleri to be crowned or be purified, adding that Eze Nri, as part of the tradition, after crowning him and other things perfected, must go to where there is water divided into two. He continued: We don t have any other water divided into two as found in Lokoja, the confluence between River Niger and River Benue. The place is too far for us and the closest one to us is the tributary river of Niger and Benue known as Ezu and Omambala. They have two rivers there, now it is at that river where the covenant must be taken. That covenant is what we know as ‘Udu-Eze’. - Any person telling you that Eze-Nri must go to Aguleri for any other thing is lying. Apart from the distance, one could also go to converging place between Niger and Benue to performance the rite instead of going to Aguleri. So, all manner of propaganda you now hear are all tissues of lies. - Nri has no similar culture with Aguleri. Since the beginning of Aguleri, it has no traditional institution. - If Nri and Aguleri have much in common, Aguleri would be producing their own traditional ruler just as Nri does. For the past 110 years, it has been only Idigo dynasty that occupies the kingship. - ‘Historical distortion’ - But Aguleri people described Igwe Onyesoh s story as a historical distortion and a travesty of Igbo history. They appointed nine persons from the area who chronicled their community s version of Igbo origin. Those who carried the assignment are Ralph Igwah, Eddy Okoye, Osita Chinwuba, Jerome Nnechi, Paul Nnamah, Raph Chikwenze, Emma Ikem, George Ejimofor and Charles Chieze. - In their report, they said: We find it difficult to believe that a prominent member of the family of Eri, the progenitor of the Igbo, and of all personages, His Royal Majesty Obidiegwu Onyeso of Nri, is credited with such a grievous falsification of facts on the history of the Igbo. Igwe
Onyeso’s present stance, as reflected in the story, is a shocking
contradiction to what he knows and believes to be the correct
situation, as he practically and faithfully demonstrated during his
visit to Aguleri in 1988, as part of the necessary traditional rites
for the traditional ruler of Agukwu-Nri.
For him to be singing a different tune now, even to the point of contesting the headship of Eri clan, and by extension of Ndi Igbo, with Aguleri is, indeed, unfortunate. The erroneous assertions by Igwe Onyeso have made it necessary to correct that impression and set the records of Igbo history straight, particularly their settlement in Nigeria. - The continued: Eri from Israel was the fifth son of Gad, the seventh son of Jacob (Genesis 46:15-18 and Numbers 26:16:18). He migrated from Egypt with a group of companions just before the exodus of the Israelites from Egypt many centuries ago. They travelled by water and finally arrived at the confluence of Ezu and Omambala (Anambra) Rivers, located in present-day Aguleri, where, according to oral tradition, it was spiritually or divinely revealed to Eri that the point was to be their final destination and settlement. They moved into the hinterland and settled in the present-day Aguleri. Eri lived and died at Aguleri. - Agulu was the eldest son of Eri, and not Menri, as claimed by Igwe Onyeso. This is supported by oral tradition in Aguleri and in other communities of Eri clan. It is also confirmed by historical accounts by many writers of Igbo history. - As the population at the settlement of Eri at Aguleri increased, and in combination with other factors, the children of Eri and/or their descendants left the settlement and founded various other settlements outside Aguleri, while Agulu, the first son, remained in their father’s home at Aguleri with his descendants. Agulu, fondly called Agulu-Nwa-Eri, appended the name of their father, Eri, to his name and founded Agulu-Eri (Aguleri). Menri left Aguleri and settled at a big forest, where he engaged in hunting and farming, while also performing his spiritual work. He called the settlement Agu-Ukwu (Nri). - When he was getting very old, he told his children to take him back to his ancestral home, as he would not want to die outside his father’s home. Menri was brought back to Aguleri, where he died and was buried. His grave is still marked at Okpu, in Ivite Aguleri, till this day. There is no other grave site of Menri, the founder of Nri, anywhere else in Igbo land, even in Nri itself, except in Aguleri. - It is also a known fact that, by tradition, no Nri man would break the kolanut where an Aguleri man is present, except with his permission. This is in deference to the fact that Agulu (Aguleri) was the elder brother of Menri (Nri). Furthermore, in recognition of the fact that Aguleri is the first son of Eri and the ancestral home of Ndi-Igbo, as well as the custodian of all the spiritual sites and places of Eri kingdom, traditional rulers of Agukwu-Nri, from time past, till date, including the famous late Igwe Tabansi Udene, visited Aguleri for certain traditional rites, without which they would not have become traditional rulers of Nri. These facts amply confirm that Aguleri was the first settlement and the ancestral home of the Igbos, and not Nri, as erroneously claimed by Igwe Onyeso. - In fulfillment of the age-long traditional rites for kingship in Nri, Igwe Obidiegwu Onyeso, as Igwe-elect, visited Aguleri in 1988, accompanied by a delegation from Nri, which included the late prominent lawyer, Chief Ezebilo Umeadi (SAN). Igwe-elect Onyeso and his delegation spent seven days in Aguleri, from 9th February to 15th February, 1988, visiting sacred places, paying homage and making sacrifices to certain deities/shrines. - It is, indeed, unbelievable that after going through these entire coronation rites, Igwe Onyeso could refer to his visit to Aguleri in 1988 in a very casual and less-than-honest manner. Also, by saying that Aguleri and Nri do not have much in common, Igwe Onyeso knows, from the bottom of his heart, that he was being very economical with the truth. His visit to Aguleri to collect the Ududu-Eze or clay from Agbanabo is not a casual affair. It goes with a lot of ceremonies and tradition. - Besides, Agbanabo, in the oral tradition of Eri clan, including Nri, is not just any place ‘where two rivers meet’. It has great spiritual significance, because it was at this point that Eri had a divine revelation that they had reached their ordained place of settlement. Members of Eri clan, including Nri, therefore, have a strong spiritual attachment to Agbanabo. And this has made it an important and mandatory feature in the coronation rites of the people of Nri. That was why Igwe Onyeso had to go to Agbanabo, at Aguleri, as a matter of traditional obligation, and not merely as any place ‘where two rivers meet’. - The visit of Igwe Obidiegwu Onyeso, as Igwe-elect, with his people to Aguleri in 1988, including the places he went to, making sacrifices and paying homage to certain deities/shrines, was well captured in a video coverage. The video is available in Aguleri archives for anyone who cares to see and is interested in knowing the truth. - From historical facts, Aguleri, and not Nri, is the first son of Eri and the ancestral home of Ndi-Igbo. We do not know what propelled our brother, Igwe Obidiegwu Onyeso, to engage in virtual apostasy by repudiating the traditional rites he went through at Aguleri, as well as the unwarranted denigration of Aguleri and the sacred and spiritual facts about Eri and his descendants, even to the extent of saying that ‘Aguleri and Nri do not have much in common’. This was after he had stated that Aguleri and Nri were among the direct children of Eri. - We are, indeed, at a loss to understand our brother any more. We hope it is not a case of ‘he who the gods want to destroy, they first make mad’. The spiritual and traditional bond between Aguleri and Nri cannot easily be wished away, just as we are reminded of the fate of some Igwes of Nri in the past, who failed to visit Aguleri to consummate the traditional rites for kingship in Nri. Perhaps, what happened to them is instructive and should be a guide to all it may concern! |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mauritius#History The island of
Mauritius was uninhabited before its first recorded visit during the
Middle Ages by Arab
sailors, who named it Dina Arobi. However, the island might have been
visited well before by sailors of ancient times; wax tablets were found
on the shores of Mauritius by the Dutch, but since the tablets were not
preserved, it cannot be said whether they were of Greek or Phoenician
or Arabic origin.
|
The Cwezi or the Bachwezi were an ancient people on the source of the Nile River believed to have lived and ruled peacefully the ancient empire of Kitara or Empire of the Sun from perhaps 10,000 BC up until 1500 A.D. They were said to be demi-godly in nature and possessed a high intellect in addition to paranormal capabilities. However, legend has them shrouded in great mystery, yet they remain revered and praised across the western parts of great rift valley of East Africa particularly in most cultures of Uganda and are heard about through Tutsi oral traditions. Cwezi are still worshiped by tribes in Ankole,Toro,Buganda,East Congo,Tanzania,Burundi and Rwanda.
Varying schools of thought suggest Cwezi were part of the superhuman races, or remnants of such ancient people/beings that may have landed along the Nile valley from around 5000 BCE or pre-historic times, establishing great civilizations along it’s banks from deeper areas past Lake Tanganyika around Zimba-za Mabwe ( Zimbabwe)-Houses of stones (ruins) through to the Nile delta ,Cwezi (Suez) canal and Sumeria.A time period that may have seen the constructions of great Kamitic and Sudanic pyramids and ancient Kushitic civilizations.Lets also not rule out that, these mysterious people may have been fathers of the great Kings and Queens of Kush,Nubia and Khamiti or of the same blood or part of the group of known Sudanic and Kamitic Gods but not just ancients of Uganda.
Cwezi may have been of the bloodline of the off springs of super races that stemmed from those millennia and far exceedingly perhaps,were of extraterrestrial in origin.
Modern scholars disregard strong physical remains in addition to oral legend around the source of the Nile as evidence.Ancient sites of their residence and activities were confirmed at BIGO BYA MUGENYI which is thought to have been the principle base and capital of their rulership within the interlacustrine region of East Africa.More sites are at Ntusi and Toro dating from time unknown to around the 16th century.
Also, contrary to* European staunch belief in physical evidence, Africans traditionally put strong emphasis on keeping records and information orally;and as such, a strong oral tradition of passing down historical information and other important knowledge as well as saving records in form of artifacts has been observed, maintained and handed down to younger generations from time to time in almost amongst all African peoples,since time immemorial.The timeless secret teachings passed down through word of mouth,rituals or sometimes encrypted into songs ,temples and artecrafts concealed and enshrined behind a veil of hieroglyphs and symbolism.
Modern theorists cast the Cwezi to have arrived in the western part of Uganda around 500 C.E ( a major misconception) from the north of the Nile planting seeds of leaders and introducing more organized kingdoms in the east African region.
The Cwezi ruled Kitara empire which stretched from modern day Eastern Congo, western/ eastern parts of Uganda,Kano plains of Kenya to Karagwe, Rwanda and Burundi but not secluded around lake George and Albert as previously assumed. Their bloodlines went on to form modern day kingdoms of Toro, Buganda, Ankole, Rwanda and Burundi and perhaps lost kingdoms of the Kongo and Zanj.
Oral legend further state that Bacwezi were half gods and half humans while some writers describe them as beings with one foot on earth and another foot astral thus the belief to have held and combined an alien quality with that of Earth.
Cwezi Qualities
Oral tradition describes the Cwezi to have been very tall,dark to dark-brown and sometimes brown with supernatural abilities and practiced teleportation and telekinesis.
While modern scientists are still dumbfounded on how the Giza pyramids were constructed, it was largely through telekinesis that 30 ton blocks of rocks were lifted miles from South Sudan to Cairo in the construction of Pyramids. The initial weight of granite before transportation to Giza was more than 30 ton in weight before final block was precisely cutout using a lost magic/laser technology into desired shape and size that only people of the time knew so well.The rocks were not chiseled out and conveyed up with primitive tools as modern scientists purport.Such presumption came from an idea forced on by belief in accepted hypothesis by secular paleontologists that, nothing ancient should be intelligent than that which we have today, in their quest to validate paleolithic age as that of a primitive Human.
Cwezi were reported to have possessed super natural powers and a laser technology that simplified mega works of Masonry. They were also described to be clairvoyant and could telepathically read thoughts and foresee events.Oral legend say that Cwezi could disappear and reappear in an instant and as such they simply disappeared when about to die or when an imminence of danger felt inevitable or when in urgent need to travel afar.This also suggest that they may have been influencing other parts of Africa or the world at the same time. Maybe in Mali or southern Africa considering similar account of such beings on oral tales of the Bambara people,the Ife of west Africa and the San people of kalahari.
The aspect of air travel
using
mysterious powers was reported of Cwezi.This
phenomenon or ability to
levitate and defy gravity and conduct air travel
on a Mat to far away distances was still
practiced by people of Gisaka (Kibungo) in Rwanda and
Karagwe until the late 1980s when evangelical Christianity took root
into east Africa and discouraged heirs and guardians of that secret
knowledge from practicing the mysticism which got labeled as
Witchcraft. Later,most custodians of that knowledge faced extermination
in the 1994 Rwandan genocide. Unconventional Air travel among Africans
was well known within certain tribes long before western
discovery of aerodynamics.This
ability to travel without modern technology may have been additional
aid in ancient migrations of groups to far corners of the planet and
even to outer planets.
- By Antonio Mark McCoy Sr. © Copyright 2005, Antonio Mark McCoy Sr. - Now to more of
our
Human Evolution. As I explain each line of
evolution.
But as you also can see, there are broken fossil records as well. Like
from Robustus to Rudolfensis. And from Homo Ergaster to
Australopithecus
Habilis. And from Australopithecus Anamensis to Paranthropus
Bosei. Which tells us that these Beings were all
of a different evolutionary family. But all did give-rise to man
though.
And I gave you the answer to why there are missing links between them,
in my other E-Books.
Now allow me to
continue with another of my charts. One that was
actually taken from one of my other E-Books. Which is minus some
information
that I have decided to exclude. But it clearly shows our Human
evolution
and division, from the stage of Homo Erectus. But also from the stage
of
the Neanderthals as well. Which brings me to my point here. Which is
the
"Neanderthals". Some Scientist speak of them as if they were sort of
"Frankenstein
Monster". When they were actually part of our Human evolution. They did
not give-rise to our Homo Sapient Sapient Species. But they are part of
it
though. With their Genes within many of us today. Simply because they
were
all absorbed into our Homo Sapient Sapient Species. And around 100,000
years
B.C. the Homo Sapient Sapiens did arrive to take-over from the already
existing
Neanderthals then. Some scientist believe after that, the more
intelligent
Homo Sapient Sapiens either killed-off, absorbed, or out-competed the
already
existing Neanderthals. I believe that it was a host of reasons. And all
of the above.
But as you can
see in
my chart above, the Neanderthals also mated
with the already existing Homo Sapiens. Who came 60,000 years before
the
Neanderthals themselves. And it was obvious that all three
branches of Humans were able to
successfully
mate together. Now the difference between the three is the Brain
basically.
As I did explain the difference in these three peoples in one of my
other
E-Books. As I told you how it was Genetic tampering that created each
group
of peoples. But I'm not about to get into that here. So where
are these Neanderthals today? Well they are all intertwined
within our genetics. !That's where. And I'll leave it at that for now.
|
http://www.monitor.co.ug/artsculture/Reviews/Ancient-Egyptian-Pharaohs-related-to-Ugandans---DNA/-/691232/2419938/-/cjldv9/-/index.html Ancient Egyptian Pharaohs related to Ugandans - DNA This year, Ugandans have witnessed the use of DNA tests to settle prominent public cases in the media concerning the paternity of children and of celebrities who have died. What has not been known to many people is the dispute concerning the ethnicity of the ancient Egyptians by scholars in the 20th Century. This dispute has been solved scientifically by the DNA tests conducted on the mummies of the ancient Egyptians in 2012 and 2013. In December 2012, DNA tests were conducted on the mummies of Pharaoh Rameses III and his son, which proved that they belonged to human Y chromosome group E1b1a. This is the Y chromosome group of Sub Saharan Africans who speak Niger–Congo languages. The disclosed Y chromosome group of the Pharaoh, at the time of releasing the report, was considered as just one of the details to make the investigation scientifically solid with facts. But its revelation caused a stir equal to the purpose of the original forensic investigation. Another group of mummies from the Amarna period of Egyptian pharaohs were tested by DNA Tribes, an American Company which specialises in conducting DNA tests, in 2013. The conclusion of the tests were that the mummies autosomal profiles would be most frequent in the present day populations of the African Great Lakes region and Southern Africa. Subsequent analysis of the autosomal profile of the mummy of Pharaoh Rameses III also concluded that this matched the genetic profiles of the population of the Great Lakes region as well. It was reported in the DNA Tribe’s digest of February 2013, that the DNA match results of the ancient Egyptian Amarna royal mummies with the present day world regions reflect the population changes in Africa after the time of Rameses III. One issue which remains unresolved is that of language. The language of ancient Egypt is classified as belonging to the Afro-Asiatic family of languages, which are spoken by people like the Somali and Amhara of Ethiopia, while the genetic profiles of the mummies match those of Niger–Congo language speakers. The most likely explanation is that some of the Niger-Congo speaking people, who were carriers of human Y chromosome E1b1a, moved into ancient Egypt along the Nile from the Sahara region as the region dried up and fused with the Afro-Asiatic speaking people, giving rise to the unique language of ancient Egypt. However, these speakers of the Niger–Congo language went on to form the ruling class producing pharaohs for Egypt, while retaining the customs which they practised in common with their relatives who had migrated south into the Great Lakes region as the genetic tests have shown. The writer is a cultural heritage consultant THE CONNECTIONS The strong cultural connection between the ancient Egyptians and the modern people of the Great Lakes region of Africa have long been noted for more than a century now by ethnographers (people who study ethnicity). The following examples illustrate this connection. Female heirs. The Egyptian pharaohs, like the rulers of the Great Lakes kingdoms of East Africa, ascended to their thrones with their sisters or cousins as co-rulers. In Bunyoro and Tooro kingdoms, the sister was called the Rubuga, but is currently called the Batebe. In Buganda kingdom, she was called the Lubuga, now called Nalinya. In Buganda, this custom from antiquity of having female co-heirs is still practised in all cultural succession events. Royal drums. Secondly, in all the Great Lakes kingdoms, ceremonies were carried out at certain intervals to welcome the appearance of the new moon. Regalia such as the royal drums and twin objects were brought out on these occasions to pray for the wellbeing of the kingdoms as was done in the courts of the ancient Egyptian pharaohs. Bows and arrows. Another custom of the pharaohs in common with the kings of Great Lakes kingdoms were the use of bows and arrows in the coronation ceremonies. The coronation rituals of the pharaohs were repeated in the Sed festivals of the pharaohs, a record of which has been kept by historians. A description of the bow and arrow part of the coronation section reads: “Next, the pharaoh was carried to the chapels of the gods Horus and Seth, where he was handed a bow and arrows with which he shot an arrow in each of the four directions” i.e. East, West, North and South. In Bunyoro. An identical ceremony was enacted during the coronation of the Omukama of Bunyoro Kingdom. In his book: Abakama Ba Bunyoro Kitara, published in 1947, John William Nyakatura, a historian and a county chief of Bunyoro Kingdom, recorded the following ceremony for the new king: “Then the king was handed bows and arrows. He shot four arrows in all directions- one arrow was shot in the direction where the sun rises (Buganda and Busoga), the second one was shot in the direction where the sun sets, the third one in the southward direction (Nkore and Rwanda), the fourth one was shot in the northward direction (Bukedi and other countries). This action meant every rebel/rival who came from any of these directions would be killed with an arrow. In Buganda. Buganda Kingdom in precolonial times also had a bow and arrow coronation ceremony as part and parcel of the enthronement rituals of the kings. In fact, the one of Buganda was deadly. A captive would be shot with an arrow by the new Kabaka to indicate that he would be vigorous in protecting his kingdom. The victim would then be killed by the king’s guards thereafter. Musical instruments. The similarities between ancient Egypt and the Great Lakes also extended to the material culture. Scholars have noted the resemblance of the musical instrument in ancient Egypt and the kingdoms of the Great Lakes, notably the bow- harps and flutes. This fact is mentioned in the display of Ugandan bow harps at the Uganda Museum. The plank sewn canoes on Lake Victoria used in precolonial times were bound together using vegetative materials and were assembled in a similar way to the boats used by the ancient Egyptians on the Nile. This similarity was noticed by the scholars when British rule was established in East Africa. Civilisation. In the 19th Century, explorers and anthropologists encountered the Great Lakes kingdoms and noted the unexpected sophistication of the societies in these kingdoms. It was assumed that Egyptian culture had influenced the culture of the Great Lakes region. In the actual fact, the direction of influence was the other way round. The anthropologists were observing a society similar to one out of which the ancient Egyptian civilisation had emerged. editorial@ug.nationmedia.com |
http://thetruthwins.com/archives/newly-found-megalithic-ruins-in-russia-contain-the-largest-blocks-of-stone-ever-discoveredNewly Found Megalithic Ruins In Russia Contain The Largest Blocks Of Stone Ever DiscoveredAn incredible
discovery
that was
recently made in Russia threatens to
shatter conventional theories about the history of the planet. On
Mount Shoria in southern Siberia, researchers have found an absolutely
massive wall of granite stones. Some of these gigantic granite
stones
are estimated to weigh more than 3,000 tons, and as
you will see below, many of them were cut “with flat surfaces, right
angles, and sharp corners”. Nothing of this magnitude has ever
been
discovered before. The largest stone found at the megalithic
ruins at
Baalbek, Lebanon is less than 1,500 tons. So how in the world did
someone cut 3,000 ton granite stones with extreme precision, transport
them up the side of a mountain and stack them 40 meters high?
According to the commonly accepted version of history, it would be impossible
for ancient humans with very limited technology to accomplish such a
thing. Could it be possible that there is much more to the
history of
this planet than we are being taught?
https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.435853863203273.1073741952.208845839237411&type=3 Megaliths of Shoria: The Russia StonehengeIn
what
may
soon
be
considered
a
find
for
the
ages,
Russian
geologists
are
carefully
releasing information on
a newly discovered Megalithic site nestled in the mountains of southern
Kuzbass. First documented in 1991 the "Russian Stonehenge" is located
in the Kemerovo region 1200 meters (about a mile), above sea level.
According to some of the early testing, the site is around 100,000
years old, rises about 40 meters high, (131 feet) and extends for 200
meters,(656 feet), in an area of the Shoria mountains. As you view
these incredible images – you’ll notice that the rocks are position in
a systematic manner – and some of the stonework is 1,000+ tons.
- - |
http://www.africaresource.com/rasta/articles/african-roots-of-ireland/ There are credible sources for the African association with Ireland. The most likely of these is that they were Phoenicians and/or Egyptians. The Phoenicians were Canaanites, which came from the line of Ham. Ham is the mythological ancestor of the Black nation. The Phoenicians were also well-known for their sailing skills, and are said to have traveled to the British Isles, which they called the “Tin Islands”. Perhaps, before Ireland was a Celtic domain, which it wasn’t until a few centuries BCE, the Phoenicians colonized it. It is noteworthy that the name Fomorians sounds a bit like Phoenicians. |
http://www.raceandhistory.com/cgi-bin/forum/webbbs_config.pl?md=read;id=1372 Ancient Irish
mythology refers to the original inhabitants of the
island as being a giant, sea-faring people called the Fomorians
(Fomors), which means "dark of the sea". They are said to be of Hamitic
stock. These demons, as they are portrayed as, defeated the first few
incoming waves of invaders, but could not defeat the Firbolgs, who
settled the land and lived side-by-side with the native Fomors. Two
more invasions, the first led by the godly Tuatha de Danaan, and the
second by the Celtic Milesians, took control of Ireland, mixing
together with the Fomorians until they were no more.
|
http://www.patflannery.com/IrishHistory/TheMilesians.htm The Fomorians But we do have the equivalent of the Jewish biblical scrolls: the Lebor Gabála or 'Book of Invasions', passed down in Ireland from time immemorial. Just as in reading the Jewish Bible when you peer through the fantasy weaved by the storytellers you see the outline of the history beneath. There
is
abundant
reference
to
a
race
of
people
called
the
Fomorians
who
were
an
ancient
race
thought
to
have
come
from
Northern
Africa
or
Asia
who
had
dark
hair
and
dark
skin
and
were
great
seafarers. The
name
in
Gaelic means faoi-mhuir “from beneath the
sea” (viewed from ashore arriving ships seem to come up from the sea,
seafarers). These
Fomorians were
not confined to Ireland. They colonized the whole western European
seaboard as far north as Norway.
|
http://www.ireland-information.com/articles/blackirish.htm 'Black
Irish'
is
often
a
description
of
people
of
Irish
origin
who
had
dark
features, black hair, dark
complexion and eyes. A
quick review of Irish history reveals that the island was subject to a
number of influxes of foreign people. The Celts arrived
on the island
about the year 500
B.C. Whether or not this was an actual invasion or
rather a more gradual migration and assimilation of their culture by
the natives is open to conjecture, but there is sufficient evidence to
suggest that this later explanation is more likely. The next great
influx came from Northern Europe with Viking raids occurring as early
as 795 A.D.
|
https://selfuni.wordpress.com/2014/03/18/irish-leprechauns-were-originally-black/
“…Candid authorities like the British Egyptologists Gerald Massey and Albert Churchward, the Scottish historian David Mac Ritchie, and the British antiquarian Godfrey Higgins, have done exhaustive research and brought many facts to our knowledge. Tacitus, Pliny, Claudian and other writers have described the Blacks they encountered in the British Isles as “Black as Ethiopians,” “Cum Nigris Gentibus,” “nimble-footed blackamoors,” and so on. From all indications, the ancient dwellers of the British Isles and Ireland, like the Kymry (one of the names given to the earliest inhabitants, from whom the Picts and Scots descended), were Blacks. David Mac Ritchie has provided substantial evidence in his two-volume work, Ancient and Modern Britons that the Picts as well as the ancient Danes were Blacks. The Partholans, Formorians, Nemeds, Firbolgs, Tuatha De Danann, Milesians of Ireland and the Picts of Northern Scotland were all Blacks. The Firbolgs (believed to be a section of the Nemeds) are believed to be so-called pygmies or the Twa. They are the dwarfs, dark elves or leprechauns in Irish History. The British Egyptologist Albert Churchward is convinced that the Tuatha-de-Danann, who came to Ireland, were of the same race and spoke the same language as the Fir-Bogs and the Formorians…” (http://culturalhealth.blogspot.com/2011/03/irish-leprechauns-were-originally-black.html) According to legend, St. Patrick was well known for “chasing the serpents out of Ireland”. Now on the outside they make it sound like some miracle that he saved the people from deadly serpents. There is in fact no evidence that real serpents ever existed in Ireland. But if you understand that the “serpents” they are speaking of are really a symbol for something else, this particular plot point in the story becomes a lot more interesting. As will be demonstrated below the “serpents” of the story are an allusion to the people of African descent (the Twa) who lived in Ireland. Its important to note, that in addition to Twa, some of the names for our people include; Naga, Nagar and Negus, which means loosely “serpent people” or “people of the serpent”. The name is also synonymous with Pharaohs and Kings. In many African cultures the serpent is not a symbol of evil but one of eternal life, regeneration, power, protection and wisdom. Chasing the serpents out of Ireland is a metaphor for genocide.
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Celts The earliest
archaeological culture that may justifiably be considered Proto-Celtic
is the Late Bronze Age Urnfield
culture of Central Europe, which flourished from around 1200 B.C.
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newgrange Newgrange
(Irish: Sí an Bhrú) is
a prehistoric monument in County Meath, Ireland, about one kilometre
north of the River Boyne.
It was built
about 3200 BC.
|
http://www.timeslive.co.za/scitech/2014/01/27/europeans-were-once-black-studyThe DNA of a hunter-gatherer who lived in Spain some 7 000 years ago suggests that Europeans were dark-skinned until much more recently than previously thought, researchers said Sunday.Genetic material recovered from a tooth of La Brana 1, an ancient man whose skeleton was dug up in a deep cave system in Spain in 2006, revealed a strange combination of dark skin and blue eyes, according to a study in the journal Nature. Europeans from the Mesolithic Period between 10 000 and 5 000 years ago, when La Brana lived, were thought to have already been fair-skinned due to low ultraviolet radiation levels at these high latitudes. "Until now, it was assumed that light skin colour evolved quite early in Europe, (during) the Upper Palaeolithic... But this is clearly not the case," study co-author Carles Lalueza-Fox from Spain's Evolutionary Biology Institute, told AFP. "This individual had the African variants for the pigmentation genes." The Upper Palaeolithic or Late Stone Age stretched from 50 000-10 000 years ago, followed by the Mesolithic or Middle Stone Age that lasted until about 5 000 years ago, when it was followed in Europe by the Neolithic or New Stone Age. Lalueza-Fox said light-skinned Europeans emerged "much later" than once believed - possibly only in the Neolithic era when erstwhile hunter-gatherers became farmers. |
http://blog.ancient.eu.com/2013/11/21/scota-mother-of-the-scottish-people/ - The Story of Scota The
tale
begins
with
a
Greek
prince
named
Gaythelos,
who
is
called
“Goídel
Glas”
by
Bower.
As happens quite often in history, the royal prince was
not given any position of power by his father. Gaythelos, being angry
about this, caused much destruction and trouble in his father’s
kingdom, even going so far as gathering his own army. His father forced
Gaythelos into exile.
-
- Gaythelos sailed across the Mediterranean to Egypt where the Pharaoh Chencres was in a struggle to drive the Ethiopians out of his lands. The Ethiopians had a powerful kingdom to the south and at various times had ruled parts of Egypt. Gaythelos joined his army with that of the Pharaoh during the fight, and together they pushed the Ethiopians out of Egypt. At the end of these hostilities, Gaythelos formed another alliance with Chencres to help keep the Children of Israel in bondage. In recognition of Gaythelos’ loyalty, bravery, and strength, Chencres gave Gaythelos his daughter Scota in marriage. - The Scotichronicon goes on to tell us that Chencres was the pharaoh who died when the Red Sea parted as he was chasing the Children of Israel. The people of Egypt were looking for reform and saw the death of the pharaoh as their opportunity to make changes. Gaythelos was viewed as a continuation of the status quo, and after a period of civil unrest, Gaythelos was again driven into exile. The
army
and
people
that
went
into
exile
with
Gaythelos
proclaimed
him
their
king
and
called themselves “Scots”
after
their
queen;
however,
there
was
no
kingdom
to
rule.
They
wandered
the
desert
for
years
before
Gaythelos
took
his
family
and
his
tribe
of
Scots
and
sailed
from
the
African
continent
to
the
Iberian
Peninsula
(present-day
Spain
and
Portugal).
There,
they
settled
in
the
northwest
corner
of
the
peninsula
at
a
place
called
Brigancia.
The
Romans
later
called
this
city
“Brigantium,”
and
it
is
now
the
city
of
A
Coruña,
located
in
the
autonomous
province
of
Galicia,
Spain.
- Scota gave birth to a son named Hyber; it is said the old name for Ireland, “Hibernia,” comes from this son. The descendants of the Scots tribe lived on the Iberian Peninsula for several generations in a state of perpetual war with the local Iberian tribes. Eventually, some members of the tribe sailed across the Cantabrian Sea — the Bay of Biscay — in search of a new place to live, and settled in Ireland. Some of these settlers established a home in Scotland in the area that comprises contemporary Argyll. After the time of the Romans, the people in this area were called the “Scotti” and ultimately the name of the country to the north of Britain became “Scotland.” - There is another version of the legend in the Irish record called the “Leabhar Gabhála” or the “Book of Invasions.” This chronicle was written by monks in Ireland in the late 11th century CE to rationalize the existence of Gaels in Ireland. In this version of the legend, the ultimate ancestor of the Gaels was a Scythian king named Fennius Farsa. Scythia was located north of the Black Sea in what is now the eastern Ukraine. For unknown reasons, Farsa lost his throne and escaped to Egypt. His son, Nial, married the daughter of the pharaoh and had a son named Goidel. This family refused to participate in the persecution of the Children of Israel and was banished from Egypt, wandering throughout northern Africa. Eventually they sailed through the Straits of Gibraltar and settled in Iberia. - Among the descendants of Farsa was a man named Mil — also known as Milesius and “Míle Easpain” or “the Soldier of Spain.” Mil’s nephew had been killed in Ireland by the Tuatha Dé Danaan, the previous occupiers of the island, and Mils departed Spain on an expedition to avenge this death, bringing his wife Scota with him. Tragically, both Mil and Scota were killed in the fighting leaving their three sons — Eber, Eremon and Amairgen — to complete the conquest of Ireland. The Gaels considered Scota to be their ancestral mother and called themselves the “Scots” for this reason. |
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_suppressedearthhistory02.htm -
Medieval legend - A medieval manuscript called the Scotichronicon, or Chronicles of the Scots, written in AD 1435 by a monk named Walter Bower, gives the following legend about the origin of the Scots:
The manuscript goes on to
say that the Egyptians settled in what is now Scotland, were
later chased out by the local population and moved to Ireland, where
they merged with an Irish tribe and became known as the Scotti.
They became High Kings of Ireland, and eventually re-invaded and
re-conquered Scotland, which gains its name from their founding
princess, Scota. - Orkneyinga Saga, written in Iceland
in about 1200
AD, attributes the name of Norway to a legendary founder called
Nor, and Historia Brittonum, written
in
northern Britain around 830 AD, attributes the names of major European
tribes (Franks, Goths, Alamans, Burgundians, Longobards, Saxones,
Vandals) to the sons of a descendant of Noah.
- Kingdom of the Ark attempts to find evidence to support the story of Scota's journey from Egypt to Britain or Ireland. - Egyptian history
- As Scota is not an Egyptian name, the first task for the author is to identify a plausible candidate princess from surviving Egyptian records. The Walter Bower manuscript gives the name of Scota's father as Achencres, and a historian called Manetho, writing around 300 BC, gives Achencres as the Greek version of Akhenaten. As readers of the recent novel Nefertiti will know, Akhenaten ruled in Egypt around 1350 BC and instigated a political and religious revolution, moving the capital to a new city at a site known today as Amarna and attempting to change the religion of Egypt to sole worship of the sun-disk or Aten. - Six daughters of Akhenaten and his queen Nefertiti are known from carvings in the royal palaces excavated at Amarna. The author argues that five of the daughters appear to have died in Egypt, and that the eldest daughter Meritaten disappears from the records at around the time of Akhenaten's death and met an unknown fate. -
On the strength of this,
she identifies Meritaten as 'Scota'. -
Given this upheaval, it is
not implausible that a daughter of Akhenaten might have had good reason
to become a political refugee and look for a new life outside Egypt,
perhaps with a foreign husband. Several chapters in Kingdom of the
Ark are devoted to Akhenaten's chaotic reign and its aftermath, and
are among the most detailed and informative in the book (probably
reflecting the author's background as an Egyptologist). - This relies mainly on material from a range of archaeological sources, summarized below. - -
A second, similar,
necklace was found in a Bronze Age burial mound in Devon in 1889. As
the faience beads are similar to those found in Egypt at the same
period, the author suggests that the burials may have been high-ranking
Egyptians. -
Amber from the Baltic Sea
is found in Bronze Age contexts in Britain and in Mycenae (Greece),
indicating the existence of long-distance trading routes across Europe.
The amber's source can be identified by infrared analysis. - The Bower chronicle says that the followers of Scota settled for a while in Spain and built, Numerous Egyptian artifacts have been found in Spain, dating from the Third Dynasty (well before the time of Akhenaten and the supposed flight of Meritaten), indicating long-established links between Egypt and Spain. (However, as far as I can see the author does not claim that Egyptian artifacts have been found at motilla sites). - Two barrow burials near Stonehenge in Britain were excavated in 1808 and 1818 and contained amber jewellery and gold artifacts that resemble types found in the eastern Mediterranean. - Tin ingots have been found in Cornwall that resemble those found in the eastern Mediterranean. The author suggests that Cornish tin may have been traded, probably by the Phoenicians, into the Mediterranean in the Bronze Age, but notes that it cannot be proved because the Cornish ingots cannot be dated. - Two Bronze Age shipwrecks found in the English Channel, one near Dover and one in Devon, date to about 1200 BC and appear to have been carrying cargoes of bronze artifacts of types found in Continental Europe, indicating that seaborne trade between Britain and Europe occurred in the Bronze Age. |
THE
FALSE
"WHITE"
ROYALS:
-
BY ANTONIO MARK MCCOY SR. - 2013 - ALL OF THE "WHITE EUROPEAN" AND THE "WHITE ASIAN" ROYALS ARE NOTHING BUT !PHONIES. AND THE SOLE BASIS OF THEIR ROYALTY IS !FALSE ALSO. AND ALL OF THEIR ROYAL FAMILIES WERE CREATED VIA "THEFT". BECAUSE THE CREATORS OR THE ORIGINATORS OF THEIR ROYAL HOUSES ALL STARTED IN GREEK, ROMAN, AND IN MEDIEVAL TIMES. WITH THEIR THIEVING ANCESTORS WHO RAPED AND PILLAGED. THEN STOLE THE TAXES OF THEIR OWN PEOPLES. AND OF OTHER PEOPLES. THEN CONTROLLED THEM THROUGH FEAR, INTIMIDATION, AND THROUGH TAXES. JUST LIKE TODAY. CALLING THEMSELVES THE "KINGS" AND THE "QUEENS" OF THOSE TIMES. THEY OF WHO HAVE
NO REAL BASIS OF TRUE ROYALTY. TRUE
ROYALTY IS
"AFRICAN ROYALTY" ONLY. !EGYPTIAN, ISRAELI (HEBREW) , AND SHEBAN
ROYALTY ONLY. IT
WHICH HAD BEGUN VIA THE ORIGINAL HEBREW KINGS AND
QUEENS WHO WERE THE ONLY TRUE ROYALS THEN. AND THEIR EGYPTIAN AND
ETHIOPIAN COUNTERPARTS. AND THEIR SHEBAN COUNTERPARTS. AND THE WHITE EUROPEAN AND ASIAN
ROYALS CAME MUCH MUCH LATER AFTER THAT. BEGINNING WITH THE PAGAN GREEK,
ROMANS,
AND OTHERS LIKE THEM. !THEY OF WHOM ATTEMPTED TO MIMIC THE ORIGINAL
AFRICAN ROYALTY THERE-AFTER. !THEY OF WHICH ARE
ALL "SELFISH" AND "FALSE" ROYALS.
- AND ONLY TRUE ROYALS "LOOK-AFTER" AND CARE FOR THEIR PEOPLES !FIRST. BEFORE THEY DO THEMSELVES. TRUE ROYALS WHO !WON'T ALLOW THEIR PEOPLES TO "GO-HUNGRY". AND TO STARVE IN THE STREETS. TRUE ROYALS WHO'LL ENSURE THAT EVERYONE WITHIN THEIR COUNTRY HAS A JOB. AND HAS HEALTH CARE. AND WELL BEING. AND DECENT HOMES TO LIVE IN. AND DECENT FOOD TO EAT. AND ALL OF THE ROYALS TODAY. ARE EITHER "HIDDEN". OR APPEARING TO BE MONARCHS WITH NO REAL POWER. THEY OF WHO THEN "ALLOW" THE LIKES OF THE PRESIDENTS AND THE PRIME MINISTER TO APPEAR TO BE RUNNING THEIR COUNTRIES. JUST SO THEY THE ROYALS "CAN'T" BURDEN THE SOLE BLAME WHEN THINGS AREN'T RUNNING RIGHT WITHIN THEIR COUNTRIES. - THESE !FALSE "WHITE" EUROPEAN AND ASIAN ROYALS. WHO HAVE EVEN ATTEMPTED TO ASSOCIATE THE ORIGINS OF THEIR !FALSE ROYALTY. WITH "BLACK" EGYPTIAN AND "BLACK" SHEBAN ROYALTY. AND ALSO WITH "BLACK" ISRAELITE (HEBREW) ROYALTY. IN ORDER TO JUSTIFY THEIR OWN !FALSE ROYALTY THAT WAY. AND !THAT BEING THE SOLE REASON WHY THEY HAVE ALSO ATTEMPTED TO "FALSIFY" AND TO "STEAL-AWAY" "BLACK" EGYPTIAN, "BLACK" SHEBAN, AND "BLACK" ISRAELI (HEBREW) HISTORY FOR THEMSELVES. THEY OF WHO HAVE ATTEMPTED TO "WHITE-WASH" THE IMAGES AND THE HISTORY OUR "BLACK" EGYPTIAN, SHEBAN, AND ISRAELI ROYAL ANCESTRY. - THEIR "WHITE" ROYALTY WHICH IS !FALSE. AND HAS NO CLAIM TO THE ORIGINAL ROYALTY OF THE EARTH. !THAT WHICH IS THE EGYPTIAN, THE SHEBAN, AND THE ISRAELI (HEBREW) ROYALTY. |
Bantu man... Yuya and Thuya relative? |
Egyptian man... not Yuya and Thuya relative? |
The
Sirian Gods and
God-Kings on Mars and on Earth. Had amazingly
preserved proof of their existence in "STONE". Almost like they were
saying how; "The truth that they existed will be shown to Future
Inhabitants of Planet Earth and Planet Mars." But also; "Our
legacy shall not be robbed or distorted by White Race Aliens and White
Race Peoples in the Future. And we shall ensure that the Future
Inhabitants on Planet Earth. Know that it was a Black Race of Peoples
who are responsible for the many wonders in Ancient Egypt and on
Ancient
Mars". And that message exactly is what they had done in Stone. In
Egypt there is a Statue of a Giant of enormous size, with 6 toes.
Who is said to be the Egyptian God of War Ashur. He who was worshiped
in both Egyptian and Babylonian Civilization. As well as many of the
other Egyptian Statues. Them being Giant in size. Perhaps to tell us
today
how their Rulers God-Kings were Giants? On the Wall Relief's in many an
Egyptian Temple and
Pyramid. They are Giants, standing along side, or commanding Much
Smaller Humans.
Information taken from my AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORY E-BOOK. © Copyright 2005 Antonio Mark McCoy Sr.
6786 B.C. The Civilization of Ta-Seti in Nubia existed then. Which was separate from the Egyptian Empire then. While the Natufian and Badarian Cultures in Egypt existed at the same time.
6280 B.C. Towns and cities spread
throughout
the Ethiopian
Empire around this time. As their Empire included; Egypt, Sudan, Iraq,
Ethiopia, Libya, Somalia, Israel, Jordan, Syria, Mesopotamia, South
Arabia,
and India. So there was an Ethiopian Empire that dominated after the
Egyptian
Empire did. From Egypt to Babylon, to India.
CHAPTER
#24. ANCIENT EGYPT:
The ancient Egyptian's (before the Great Flood on
Noah)
called
themselves
"Kam" or "Kam-Au", which means "Black" or "Black People". The key words
here are "Ancient Egyptian's". They were the original ancient founders
of the Egyptian Civilization and they were dark-skinned African's. This
is the very reason why the Egyptian God Amon/Amen-Ra" was represented
with
the color "Black" thereafter. It is also the reason why the following
Egyptian
Statues, Statuettes, Relief's, and Portraits represent many of these
Black
African Peoples. There "PROOF" that the Ancient Egyptian's were black.
The Egyptian Civilization that so many so-called Scholars and Historians teach today was not the first Egyptian Civilization. The first Ancient Egyptian Civilization dated all the way back to the latter years of MU, Lemuria, and Atlantis. Dating back to 48,500 years B.C. The first peoples of that particular Ancient Egyptian Civilization were black peoples who were descendants of Lemuria, because Lemurian's were Black Peoples also. They fled from Lemuria around 48,500 B.C. after many great cataclysms were destroying Lemuria.
Because Lemuria was located in the Indian Ocean, these peoples naturally migrated to India (around 70,000 B.C.) and then Africa (around 48,500 B.C.). The others that survived the destruction of Lemuria (around 23,200 B.C.) became today's Aborigines in Australia, the Maori in New Zealand, the Indonesian's, the Malaysian's, the New Guinean's, and the Philippine's. Even though the origins of these types of people seems to be different from that of many of the other dark-skinned African's in Africa, there still from the same "Root Race" from Lemuria.
Legend states that Lemuria sank into a small island called "Rutas", just before it's final demise. Left on the island of Rutas, long after the others had left Lemuria in 70,000 and 48,500 B.C. were two similar dark-skinned tribes. One was the Wadasa Tribe, that had flat broad noses and curly-type hair, and the other was the Wahindu Tribe, which had thin noses and straight-type hair. It is very obvious that the Wadasa Tribe migrated to Africa in 48,500 B.C. while the Wahindu Tribe migrated to India in 70,000 B.C. The India hill tribes of the; Kadar, Kanikkar, Uralis, and Paniyar have curly to frizzy hair, dark-brown skin, broad-noses, thick-lips, and round-heads that are characteristic of their Negroid cousins of the Andaman Islands, Malay Peninsula, and Africa.
During the destruction of Lemuria the cataclysms were destroying it's rival Atlantis also. Many of the refugees from the sinking Atlantis migrated to Europe, Northern Africa and the America's. Atlantis was completely destroyed later but long before that, Atlantis and Lemuria (MU also) fought wars against one another. This was probably one of the first so-called "Race Wars" ever recorded (through legend) by man on this Earth.
As I stated in another one of my Web Sites called; "From the Stars", "Atlantis was founded by Caucasian Extraterrestrials from the Pleiades and Venus, around 400,000 B.C. Before that MU and Lemuria was founded by Dark Skinned Extraterrestrials from the Sirius and Arturas Star Systems, and the Planet Nibiru, around 900,000 B.C.". The descendants of these Extraterrestrials colonized Mexico, Babylon, India, and Egypt. Even though the Atlantean's and the Lemurian's were at war with one another, that did not stop many other Atlantean's and Lemurian's from mating genetically. The results from that mating was a so-called "Mulatto Race of Peoples" that occupied the areas of; Northern Africa, Southern Europe, the Middle East, and Asia Minor. This mating was also said to be how the so-called "Atlantean Red Race" began.
With this
genetic
mating the
earlier Egyptian Civilization (which was
mostly all black peoples from Lemuria) became more racially diversed.
Creating
the various shades of Egyptian Peoples that were recorded in the many
statues,
statuettes, relief's, and portraits, that were found as Ancient
Egyptian
Artifacts. The first Egyptian Civilization began in 48,500 B.C. and
successfully
flourished for a recorded (through legend) 30 Dynasties. These
Dynasties
consisted of 113 descents or generations
and 36,525 years.
If you
divide those
36,525
years
by the 113 descents you will get 323.2
years per descent. Could these peoples have lived that long? Well the
Holy
Bible states that people have lived even longer. Certainly today we
cannot
live as long as that, which proves that we do not have the knowledge to
sustain our lives for those periods of time. This sheds some light on
the
nature of the ancients. Were they Extraterrestrials, or descendants of?
What else could they have been to have acquired a knowledge that is
greater
than ours today.
CHAPTERS # 8. and # 9. The ANCIENT EGYPTIAN'S:Ancient Nubia was the southern region of Ancient Egypt (Cush, Sudan, or Lower Egypt). Though some have called it Upper Egypt though. It is even know by today's so-called Scholar and Historian's as the Egyptian Kingdom that had the Dark-skinned Egyptian Pharaoh's (Kings) and peoples. I am very surprised they finally admitted that after all of these years of denial. These were Pharaoh's and peoples who all worshiped the Egyptian God Ra. Now it's time for me to show you proof of these dark-skinned peoples, Pharaoh's, and God's. These were a symbol of the Ancient Egyptian Hierarchy. One that was covered-up and white-washed, Or ignored. The following is a list of other vandalism these modern conspirators have perpetrated upon world history, in their bid to thoroughly erase the truth of african intelligence:
1.
Ignore
or
refuse
to
publish
any
facts
of
African
history"
that
would
not
support
their
racial
theories.
2.
Create a religious and 'scientific' doctrine" to ease the white
conscience
for oppressing and enslaving
African
people.
3.
Flood the world with hastily thrown together African 'histories'" that
contain European perspectives only.
4.
Start renaming people and places. Replace African names of persons,
places,
and things with Arabic and
European
names."
This
will disguise their true black identity.
5.
Change the criteria for defining race. For example, one drop of Negro
blood
in America makes you a Negro,
no
matter
how
light your skin. When reporting ancient history,
reverse
the standard. Make one drop
of
white
blood
render someone a Caucasian no matter how dark the
skin.
6.
When black participation in civilization is so obvious your best
schemes
can't hide it, find a way to attribute
the
success
to
outside white influence.
7.
When all the ancient historians contradict your theory, seek to
discredit
them.
8.
Replace Black African Artefacts with white fakes.
Queen
Nefertiti
THIS
FOLLOWING
INFORMATION
WITHIN
THIS
TABLE.
IS
NOT
PART
OF
THE
BOOK
PAGES
I'M
DISPLAYING
HERE
ABOUT
THE
EGYPTIAN'S.
- IT BEING ABOUT THE "NEFERTITI BUST" IN GERMANY THAT IS A "FAKE". AND HOW DAMN OBVIOUS IS IT? "ALL" OF THE OTHER RELIEFS AND STATURES OF QUEEN NEFERTITI. THAT DEPICT HER AS BEING A "100%" BLACK PERSON OF NO MIXED RACE". MANY OF WHICH THAT ARE SHOWN HERE BELOW. AND ALSO IN THE IMAGE TO THE UPPER RIGHT. WHILST THE IMAGE OF THE BUST IN THE UPPER LEFT. IS THE "FAKE". !IT OF WHICH WAS "DOCTORED-UP" BE THE GERMANS OF COURSE. FOR OBVIOUS REASONS. BECAUSE THE GERMAN'S. AND THEN LATER "ADOLPH HITLER". HAD ATTEMPTED TO "STEAL-AWAY" THE RACIAL IDENTITY OF THE ANCIENT EGYPTIAN'S. HITLER HIMSELF WHO CLAIMED THAT THE ANCIENT EGYPTIAN'S WERE "WHITE GERMANIC PERSONS". !IMPOSSIBLE. !IMPOSSIBLE AND "ABSOLUTELY FUCKING "RIDICULOUS". AND A GOD DAMN !LIE. AND THE "FAKE" BUST PROVES EXACTLY THAT. THAT IT'S MERELY "WHITE PEOPLES" ONCE AGAIN. !LYING TO "STEAL-AWAY" THE CREDIT OF OTHERS. BUT WHAT ELSE IS NEW WITH THEM? WHAT ELSE IS NEW WITH THE "LYING DAMN "WHITE PEOPLES"? - THE REAL NEFERTITI BUST'S AND RELIEFS |
The
Taharqa
Sphinx
The
Black Sphinx Monument
Pharaoh
Amenemhet
I Pharaoh
Amenophis
Pharaoh
Amenhotep
III
Pharaoh
Amenhotep
IV---
King
Amenemhet
I.
Notice
how
"someone"
attempted
to
erase
the
body
paint
from
King
Amenemhet.
Pharaoh Khafre
Pharaoh
Khufu
Queen Hatshepsut King
Amenhemet
III
(Son of Khufu)
(The
Great
Pyramid
Builder)
Pharaoh Taharqa
Pharaoh
Senusret Pharaoh
Metjetji Mentuhotep Prince Rahotep
Pharaoh Menkure Pharaoh Akhenaten
(One God Religion)
Queen
Tiy
Akhenaten
was the son of Queen Tiy/Tiye and Amenhotep III. And the father
of King Tut (Tutankhamun) and of course the husband of Nefertiti.
Akhenaten is described as a great visionary.
Even compared to Jesus, in the way he thought. Which was his "One God"
belief in his time. Something which did not take in his time though.
Akhenaten
did lead his religious revolution toward the new form of monotheism
though.
This religion of Aten or Aton, using the Sun as the symbol of one God,
did not survive as the national religion in Egypt. And he was possibly
murdered because of it as well?
-
I'll
now let you in on a little secret. The Sun God he was attempting to get
his peoples to worship as One
God. Was Ra. Because Ra, is Amon, Amen, Amun-Ra. And the Amen (or Amon
and Amun), is the
same as the "A Men", or "Ah Men" we use after prayer. And Jesus himself
called himself "A-Men" in
the Bible. Meaning he too is Ra. Or once played Ra as I had said before
in my other Writings. So this all adds-up now. As Akhenaten was
attempting
to usher-in a One God Religion in Egypt. Something our Black Hebrew
Israelite
Ancestors were already into then. Apparently Akhenaten had caused quite
a stir in Ancient Egypt though. Because he made plenty of enemies
because
of it. So to me, he was much like a Moses was. Who of course caused
plenty
of trouble as well in his time. Just like Jesus did. Who all
were men of considerable courage.
Pharaoh Akhenaton
King
(Pharaoh)
Narmer-The
Scorpion
King-The
First
Pharaoh
Seti (who
"WAS NOT" Set or Seth) Inhotep
CHAPTER # 11. More ANCIENT EGYPTIAN'S:
-
Moses
Pharaoh
Ramses
III
Pharaoh Amenemhet I
Pharaoh Amenemhet I
Ancient Black
Viceroy
Huy's
Ship and Sailors
The Egyptian's
were
Excellent
Sailors. As I show you evidence of it here. As I shown you the
"original
painting" of a ship that comes from Thebes. Which was found on the tomb
of "Huy". The Kushite Viceroy of Thebes. 1361 - 1352 B.C.
-
African Egyptian
Princesses-Akhenaten's
Daughters Akhenaten and
Nefertiti
-
More Royal
Egyptian's
Black
Prince
and
Princess
Ancient
Black
Egyptian
Women
CHAPTER # 14. BLACK CLEOPATRA:
--
"Black
Cleopatra"
(69-30 B.C.). First let me explain to all of you so-called Scholars. Who just can't seem to ever get this right. That there was more than one Cleopatra. Just like there was more than one Ramses in Egyptian history. Both names stands for a secession of Kings or Queens. Someone within Cleopatra's lineage though, was "DEFINITELY" Black though. As you can see above, in the Original Reliefs of her. As the First Cleopatra then later gave-rise to a mixed-race, Mulatto, and lighter-skinned Cleopatra VII. But still considered to be "BLACK", because they were descended from a Black Person. Now understand that? A Mulatto Cleopatra was probably Cleopatra VII? She too was a Black Cleopatra. Just like you consider all Mulatto's today as being "Black". Not wanting them to be white though. But of course in cases like these, you like them to be White Persons. Because they were Great Persons. What a hypocritical double-standard? But you have done this throughout history. Case and point the great Musician Beethoven. He was a Mulatto Man as well. But you called him white.
Cleopatra was a name traditionally given to women in the Royal Family of CLEOPATRA. Just like "RAMSES" was. The lighter skinned Cleopatra, that all of the White Scholars are so hell bent on being the greatest, was allegedly Cleopatra VII. The daughter of Ptolemy XII. And noticed how I said the "VII (seventh)". Meaning how there were six before her. The first Cleopatra's, "Mother" was the least famous out of the entire Cleopatra lineage. Because remember, she was the one who actually gave rise to the lineage. So who was she? Was she a "BLACK EGYPTIAN WOMAN"? !Yes. Any ways, by the time of Cleopatra VII, her race was obviously a reason why she was ostracized from Roman society. Because Romans were prejudiced against Egyptian's, because of their skin color. And despite Cleopatra's alleged Greek background, would never accept her as a suitable mate for a Roman Consul. But were they even more prejudice against her, because she was a Mulatto Egyptian? I'll say it was so.
It's also said while in Kenya, a local woman was actually married to Alexander and gave birth to twins. One white, and the other black. The Black Child brought the Turkana Tribe into the world, whereas the White Child returned to Europe. Now how come we never heard that story about the "Great Alexander"? As it turns out, Alexander wasn't so great after all. Because he was beaten in battle in India. Then turned away from his conquest there. And by a Black Indian Army. But he was also turned away in Ethiopia, by a woman. Queen Candace. A Black Woman. So that was two times the Great Alexander was turned away by two Black Armies. But you never heard that on the History Channel. !Did you? Another thing I want to mention. Did Cleopatra and Mark Anthony have any children that continued Alexander's lineage? No doubt his Mulatto lineage. As Alexander seemed to have had a liking for Darker-skinned Women. Didn't he? May be because he had black in his Ancestry?
The answer to the last question, is; !Yes they did. Cleopatra's three children by Mark Anthony, who were thought to have been raised by Mark Anthony's third wife, Octavia. Cleopatra of Cyrene or Selene (meaning "Moon") ruled from 33-31 B.C. She was Anthony and Cleopatra's daughter. She ruled Armenia, Media, and Parthia with her twin brother, Alexander. This Cleopatra married Juba, King of Numidia (Libya). Who was considered a gifted ruler, and she was made Queen of Mauretania, on the site of present day Morocco. They reigned for nearly 50 years and had two children. Her brother, Alexander, was made co-ruler with her. Ptolemy Phoenicia, the other daughter of Cleopatra and Mark Anthony was made ruler of Cilicia and Syria. Now the Moors were suppose to have originated from Morocco. Did Cleopatra's daughter give-rise to some of them? These are questions none of the White Scholars have asked. But why not?
But
they insist on how
Cleopatra
VII was a Greek. Stating how she was white. Well first Greeks are not
white.
I have had several Greek friends, and they are not white. They also
have
black hair. No blue eyes and no blond or red hair. But they also state
that, since she was an alleged Greek Family. Which was actually
Macedonian,
she had to have had lighter skin. Yet where we use that same test, for
Egypt, they reject that. So now we can see their double standard, yet
here
again. Wanting everything to be "white". When it is obviously not. Now
also, Greece was founded by the Ancient Africans. !Fact. So filter that
in. But I also have more proof next that she was black. Well a Mulatto.
Cleopatra VII was. All her Ancestors
were darker skinned.
"MOSES".
LIKE
"JOSEPH"
HUNDREDS
OF
YEARS
BEFORE
HIM
WHO HAD AN
"EGYPTIAN" WIFE. AND WAS TIED TO THE "EGYPTIAN'S". FIRST AFTER HIS
BIRTH. MOSES' ADOPTED FATHER BEING NONE OTHER THAN THE EGYPTIAN PHARAOH "SOBEKHOTEP IV
(KHANEFERRE)" IN THE 13TH DYNASTY. WHO WAS FOLLOWED BY "AY (MERNEFERRE)". AND HIM BEING FOLLOWED BY "NEFERHOTEP II". WITH THE 14TH DYNASTY BEGINNING
WITH "NEHESY". MOSES' ENEMY. BUT BEFORE PHARAOH NEHESY. MOSES HIMSELF
LEAD EGYPTIAN
ARMY TROOPS AGAINST CUSHITE AND NUBIAN TROOPS FOR HIS ADOPTED FATHER
SOBEKHOTEP IV. MOSES BEING
AN EGYPTIAN ADOPTED ROYAL SON OF THE PHARAOH THEN. MOSES WHO HAD
THEN-AFTER (DURING EXODUS) MARRIED AN EGYPTIAN WOMAN NAMED "ZIPPORAH".
THEM HAVING
DESCENDANTS WHO WERE OF COURSE EGYPTIAN-HEBREWS THEN-AFTER. BUT SO WAS
HE
DESCENDANTS OF "JOSEPH". JOSEPH'S 2 SONS WHO HAD "GIVEN-RISE" TO THE 2
TRIBES
OF "MANASSEH AND EPHRAIM". THEY OF WHOM WERE THE ANCESTORS OF THE TRIBE
OF
JOSEPH, NUMBERING 85,200 AT THE TIME OF THE EXODUS. AFTER MOSES' TIME.
MANY OTHER "LEVITES" FOLLOWED HIS LEAD AND MARRIED "EGYPTIAN" WOMEN
THEN AFTER. PROOF OF WHICH IS SHOWN IN THE ANCIENT RELIEF BELOW HERE.
OF A LEVITE DRINKING "BEER": - SO A !GREAT !GREAT DEAL OF THE HEBREW ISRAELITES IN ISRAEL. AND DURING AND AFTER EXODUS. WERE EGYPTIAN-HEBREWS. AND WHAT'S NOT TALKED ABOUT BY THE SO-CALLED EGYPT HISTORIAN'S. OR THEY SIMPLY JUST DON'T KNOW ANY OF THIS? THAT EGYPT WAS TIED TO ISRAEL EVEN AFTER THE EXODUS. VIA "KINSHIP". THEN AFTER THE HYSKOS WERE COMPLETELY DRIVEN OUT OF EGYPT BY PHARAOH "AHMOSE". BETWEEN 1549/50 TO 1524/25 B.C. THE EGYPTIAN-HEBREW ISRAELITE ANCESTRAL CONNECTION WAS "RENEWED" THEN. THEN IT WAS LATER. THE EGYPTIAN PHARAOH "THUTMOSE III" (FROM 1479 TO 1424 B.C.). HAD "TAKEN-CONTROL" AND/OR HAD "CONQUERED" ALL OF WESTERN AND SOUTHERN ISRAEL IN 1475 B.C. !THAT OF WHICH WAS POSSIBLY "NOT" A "CONQUEST" THEN THOUGH? AND WAS MORE THAN LIKELY A "UNION" INSTEAD? BECAUSE AN "EGYPTIAN" CONQUEST OF ISRAEL IS "NEVER" SPOKEN OF IN THE BIBLE, FOR THAT TIME. BUT THE INVASION AND CONQUEST OF SOUTHERN "CANAAN" BY THE EGYPTIAN'S IS THOUGH. - !BUT. THERE WAS NO "SOUTHERN CANAAN" THEN THOUGH. IT BEING THE TRIBE OF JUDAH IN THOSE TIMES THEN. !OR THE LAND THAT IS "SOUTHERN ISRAEL" TODAY. WASN'T PART OF THE TRIBE OF "JUDAH" THEN? AND "WAS" STILL CONSIDERED "SOUTHERN CANAAN" THEN? AND ACCORDING TO THE HISTORY IN "BIBLICAL JUDGES". IT "WASN'T" THE LAND OF "ISRAEL" AS OF YET. AND IT WAS "STILL" CONSIDERED TO BE "SOUTHERN CANAAN" THEN. A LAND THAT WAS ALSO CALLED "AMALEC" THEN. UP UNTIL THE TIME THE PHARAOH "THUTMOSE III" CONQUESTED IT IN 1475 B.C. THEN LATER THE PHARAOH "MERNEPTAH" (1213 - 1203 B.C.) HAD WENT TO WAR AGAINST "ISRAELIS, AND HAD LATER "DEFEATED" THEM. "WIPING THOSE PARTICULAR ISRAELITE PEOPLES OUT IN "CANAAN" (THE WILDERNESS OF ZIN). ACCORDING TO THE "MERNEPTAH STELE". !HE OF WHOM THEN LATER. WENT TO WAR AGAINST; "LIBYAN'S", "SEA PEOPLES", AND "GREEKS". AND DEFEATING THEM ALSO. KILLING 6,000 OF THEM, AND CAPTURING ANOTHER 9,000 OF THEM. !HIM BEING YET ANOTHER "BAD-ASS" EGYPTIAN PHARAOH. AND ONE OF "MY" !GREAT ANCESTORS. !YES. THESE ALL BEING MY !GREAT EGYPTIAN ANCESTORS FROM "UPPER EGYPT": |
|
NORTHERN/LOWER EGYPT: |
SOUTHERN/UPPER EGYPT AND THEBES: |
14TH DYNASTY: NEHESY (AASEHRE) - 1650 - 1593 B.C. 15th DYNASTY: HYSKOS RULERS: SALITIS SAKIR-HAR KHYAN APOPHIS - 1580 - 1540 B.C. KHAMUDI - 1540 - 1530 B.C. 16th DYNASTY: HYSKOS RULERS: ANATHER USERANAT SEMQEN BEBI-ANKH SEUSERENRE PEPI III SNEFERANKH-RE NEBMAATRE NIKARE MERIBRE NUBANKHRE AHOTEPRE ANETJERRE KHA-USERRE SAKET WADJET QAR YAKBAAM 17th DYNASTY: HYSKOS RULERS: "WHO CARES WHO THEY WERE? I DON'T."
(THEM BEING DRIVEN COMPLETELY OUT "ALL" OF EGYPT) |
16TH DYNASTY: DJEHUTI - 1649 B.C. SOBEKHOTEP VIII - 1645 B.C. NEFERHOTEP III - 1629 B.C. MENTUHOTEPI - 1628 B.C. NEBIRYRAW I - 1627 B.C. NEBIRIAU II - 1601 B.C. BERI-ANKH - 1600 B.C. SHEDWAST - 1588 B.C. DEDUMOSE I DEDUMOSE II MONTEMSAF MENTUHOTEP VI SENUSRET IV 17TH DYNASTY: SEKHEMRE-WAHKHAW-RAHOTEP - 1580 B.C. SOBEKEMSAF I SOBEKEMSAF II NUBKHEPERRE INTEF SENAKHTENRE (TAO I) SEQENERE (TAO II) - 1560 B.C. (HE OF WHOM HAD BEGAN WAR AGAINST THE HYKSOS IN LOWER EGYPT) KAMOSE - 1555 B.C. (HE OF WHOM HAD "FURTHERED" WAR AGAINST THE HYKSOS IN LOWER EGYPT) 18TH DYNASTY: AHMOSE - 1549/50 - 1524/25 B.C. (HE OF WHOM HAD DROVE THE HYKSOS COMPLETELY OUT "ALL" OF EGYPT) AMENHOTEP I - 1524/25 - 1503 B.C. THUTMOSE I - 1502 - 1493 B.C. THUTMOSE II - 1493 - 1479 B.C. HATSHEPSUT - 1479 - 1458 B.C. THUTMOSE III - 1479 - 1424 B.C. (HE OF WHOM HAD CONQUERED WESTERN AND SOUTHERN ISRAEL) AMENHOTEP II - 1424 - 1398 B.C. THUTMOSE IV - 1398 - 1388 B.C. AMENHOTEP III -1388 - 1350 B.C. AKHENATEN - 1351 - 1334 B.C. SMENKHKARE - 1335 - 1334 B.C. NEFERNEFENUATEN - 1334 - 1332 B.C. TUT - 1332 - 1323 B.C. AY - 1323 - 1319 B.C. HOREMHEB - 1319 - 1292 B.C. 19TH DYNASTY: RAMESSES I - 1292 - 1290 B.C. SETI I - 1290 - 1279 B.C. (HE OF WHOM HAD RULED WESTERN ISRAEL ALSO) RAMESSES II - 1279 - 1213 B.C. (HE OF WHOM HAD RULED WESTERN ISRAEL ALSO) MERNEPTAH - 1213 - 1203 B.C. (HE OF WHOM HAD WENT TO WAR AGAINST ISRAEL, AND HAD DEFEATED THEM) SETI II - 1203 - 1197 B.C. AMENMESSE - 1201 - 1198 B.C. SIPTAH - 1197 - 1191 B.C. TWOSRET - 1191 - 1189 B.C. 20TH DYNASTY: SETNAKHTE - 1189 - 1186 B.C. RAMESSES III - 1186 - 1155 B.C. (HE OF WHOM HAD WENT TO WAR AGAINST THE SEA PEOPLE, AND HAD DEFEATED THEM) RAMESSES IV - 1155 - 1149 BC RAMESSES V - 1149 - 1145 BC RAMESSES VI - 1145 - 1137 B.C. RAMESSES VII - 1137 - 1130 B.C. RAMESSES VIII - 1130 - 1129 B.C. RAMESSES IX - 1129 - 1111 B.C. RAMESSES X - 1111 - 1107 B.C. RAMESSES XI - 1107 - 1077 B.C. |
IN
ISRAELI-EGYPTIAN HISTORY.
WESTERN ISRAEL IS "OCCUPIED" BY THE EGYPTIAN'S A NUMBER OF TIMES. BY PHARAOH SETI I (1290 TO 1279 B.C.) AND PHARAOH RAMESSES
II (1279 TO 1213 B.C.). !BUT IN THOSE TIMES. IT BEING THE "EGYPTIAN'S"
COMING TO
THE "AID" OF "ISRAEL" THEN. TO PROTECT THEM FROM THE "HITTITES" IN THE
NORTH THEN. VIA "ALLIANCES"
MOSTLY THEN. THE PHARAOH RAMESSES II GOING TO "WAR" AGAINST THE HITTIES IN
HIS TIME THOUGH. IN
1274 B.C. THOSE PARTICULAR "HITTIES" BEING OF MIXED-RACE ANCESTRY. THEM
BEING OF "AFRICAN", "ASIAN", "EUROPEAN", AND "MIDDLE EASTERN" ANCESTRY.
!THEM BEING THOUGH. MOSTLY OF THE "INDO-EUROPEAN" DESCENDANT I MIGHT
ADD HERE. THEY OF
WHOM WERE MOSTLY "KNOCKED-FROM-POWER" BY THE "ASSYRIAN'S" THEN-AFTER
THOUGH.
- THE EARLY ASSYRIAN'S WHOM WERE A MIXTURE OF "BLACK AKKADIAN'S" AND "SHEMITES" (NOT SEMITES). THE GREAT ASSYRIAN-AKKADIAN KING "SARGON THE GREAT (2334 TO 2279 B.C.) WHO "ROSE" THEM INTO POWER THEN. THE ASSYRIAN'S WE ALL KNOW WHO WENT ON TO INVADE NORTHERN AND EASTERN ISRAEL IN 762 B.C. THE ASSYRIAN'S WHO "ROSE" TO POWER VIA THE LEADERSHIP OF THE "AKKADIAN" KING SARGON. THE AKKADIAN'S (WHO WERE LOCATED JUST NORTH OF SUMER) OF WHO TOOK POWER IN THE LAND OF BABYLON. AND THEN HAD "INVADED" WHAT WAS LEFT OF "SUMERIA" ALSO THEN. THEN IT BEING THE "CHALDEAN BABYLONIAN'S" WHO WEAKENED THE ASSYRIAN KINGDOM THEN-AFTER. AND HAD EVENTUALLY DEFEATED ASSYRIA BETWEEN 612 TO 608 B.C. VIA THE AID AND ALLIANCES OF; MEDIANS (ANCIENT IRANIAN'S), OTHER PERSIANS (ANCIENT IRANIAN'S), SCYTHIAN'S, AND CIMMERIANS. BEFORE THAT. THE CHALDEAN BABYLONIAN'S HAD INVADED THE SOUTHERN TRIBES OF ISRAEL. - I MUST ALSO NOTE. THAT THOSE PARTICULAR "CHALDEAN BABYLONIAN'S" WHO HAD ONLY "TAKEN" THE ISRAELITE'S WHO WERE; PROFESSIONALS, WEALTHY, AND SKILLED CRAFTSMEN. THE BABYLONIAN'S LEAVING THE SO-CALLED ORDINARY ISRAELITE PEOPLE TO REMAIN IN JUDAH THEN. AND "THAT" EXACTLY SHOWING YOU THE "INTELLIGENCE" AND THE "CREATIVENESS" THE ANCIENT "BLACK HAMITIC AND SHEMITIC ISRAELITES" THEN. WHICH IS "EXACTLY" WHO THEY WERE THEN. !THEY OF WHOM WHO HAD "INTELLIGENCE" AND THE "CREATIVENESS" OVER THE INVADING CHALDEAN BABYLONIAN PEOPLES THEN. CHALDEAN BABYLONIAN PEOPLES THEMSELVES WHO WERE OF "INDO-EUROPEAN" STOCK MOSTLY. PROVING THAT ANCIENT ISRAEL WAS VERY "INTELLIGENT" AND "GIFTED". AND IT ALSO BEING OF MOSTLY "BLACK HAMITIC AND SHEMITIC" STOCKS THEN. AND "THOSE" OF WHOM WERE THE PEOPLES OF ISRAEL. THEM ALSO BEING "BLACK" EGYPTIAN'S IN DESCENDANT. AND THEY "WERE NOT" OF; MEDIAN, PERSIAN, SCYTHIAN, CIMMERIAN, AND/OR OF CHALDEAN BABYLONIAN'S STOCK. MEANING THEY "WERE NOT" OF ANY "INDO-EUROPEAN" STOCK. AND THOSE "NOT" IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM. BEING THE ANCIENT ISRAELITE PEOPLES THEN. "INDO-EUROPEAN" WHITE PEOPLES WEREN'T. AND THIS "PROVES" IT "EXACTLY". - AND "WHITE" HISTORIAN'S HAVE ATTEMPTED TO "CHANGE" THE ISRAELI TIME LINE. IN ORDER TO "HIDE" !THIS. THE TRUE IDENTITY OF THESE THE "BLACK HAMITIC AND SHEMITIC ISRAELITES" OF THAT TIME. AND THE EGYPTIAN-ISRAELI ANCESTRAL CONNECTIONS. THAT HAD OCCURRED AFTER THE EXODUS. AND TO ULTIMATELY "HIDE" THE LASTING CONNECTION THE HEBREW-ISRAELITES HAD WITH THEIR "BLACK" EGYPTIAN COUSINS. |
!You
"Black Peoples", are the "True
Israelites. And not those False Israelis in Isreal. Today everyone acts
like we have an obligation to protect, and to agree with these the
False Israelis. Like if they are the Original Israelis? They "ARE NOT".
And history proves it. !History. Have you all forgotten about it?
History that also shows us that the False Isrealites are from the
Ancestry of Edomites and Khazars. And are the Children of Lilith and Adam. Lilith who was Adam's First Wife. As per my
Diagram here below. Jesus, in his times was well aware of them. The False Israelites. Who call themselves the Jews today. Who
"ARE NOT" the True HEBREW ISRAELITES" who were Gods Peoples. And Jesus
cursed the False Israelites (Jews). He cursed their Temples, their
Money-Taking, and their "WAYS".
"Lilith" was Adams first
wife
you know? She's shown as a Bird-like Reptilian. Which is an
actual image of the Ancient Babylonian Relief. She was a Nefiim
Shape-shifting Reptilian. A Demoness. As she was also known to also eat
Young Male Children. Drinking their blood as well. Lilith also gave
Adam a child. As I will tell about later below. I have discovered that
she and the Goddess "Inanna", are one of the same. Now some believe
that Inanna is "Ishtar". She is not. Ishtar was a non-Reptilian
Goddess. As well as a Good Goddess. One that was like the "Virgin
Mary", the Mother of Jesus. While Inanna is Lilith herself. As she and
Lilith are Reptilian-like. Both having "LIONS" (and/or Griffins) as
their Sacred Animals also. Both shown in Relief's with Lions (or
Griffins). Standing on Lions. As well as them both having "WINGS" on
their backs. Which is their Nefiim/Draconian nature. Inanna was also
shown as an Archer though. Maybe symbolizing herself as "The Hunter of
Men"? Just like Lilith was. As she was the Hunter, as well as the
"Seducer of Men". Then the Devourer of Men.
-
Lilith (Inanna) was also responsible for the creation of
the
"Lamiae/Lamia". The Lamiae, seduced Sleeping Men who slept on their
backs, as legend says. Then they sucked their blood and ate their flesh
afterwards. As Lilith and her fellow demonesses did. As they were also
known as "Empusae" or "Mormolyceia". And the "Children of Hecate". She
had changed into a Demoness, then flew away from Adam with her Wings.
Proving her Demon abilities to Adam. Which is something that the More
Powerful Draconian's have. !Wings. She did though have a child from
Adam. A child named "Asmodeus". But Lilith, as well as another
Reptilian like her, named "Naamah". Mothered many other Reptilian
Children, who then went on to become a Nation of Reptilian's. A Nation
of Evil. God sought to wipe them out in the Great Flood of Noah. But
many of them survived. !Including Lilith.
Living for many
thousands of
years. Which they can. Thus becoming the Reptilian Shape Shifters, that
are today's Blue Blood Nobility's of the world. Along with their Evil
Reptilian Shape Shifting Aryan Cousins of Germanic Nobility. Who were
the Queen's of England, as well
as the U.S. Presidents Ancestors. Who are Anglo Saxons, and Saxons in
ancestry. Who all descended from the Homo Neanderthalis Sapiens. From
Homo Neanderthals. Who were an Aryan Creation. From the same Aryan
Extraterrestrial's, who were themselves genetically enhanced into Reptilian Mammalian Shape Shifters, by the Draconian and the Dinoid Reptilian's. Who are all our Enemies. So are the
Ruling Parties in Israel. Who are the Descendants of Lilith and Naamah. Who are from Tubal-Cain and the Edomites. As the Edomites were Reptilian's in descent as well. As Edom",
was
exactly
like
a
Red
Headed,
Pale-Skinned
Aryan.
Who
are
descended
to
the
Blue
Blood
Reptilian
Nobility.
Illuminati.