Then a careful study of Native American Indian tribal names has revealed that many of the names are derived from Arab and Islamic roots and/or origins, such as the; Anasazi, Apache, Arawak, Algonquin, Arikana, Chavin, Cherokee, Cree, Hohokam, Hupa, Hopi, Iroquois, Makkah, Mahigan, Mohawk, Nazca, Zulu, and Zuni. The Algonquian Language contain words with arabic roots that pertain to; navigation, astronomy, meteorology, medicine, and anatomy.
In the book "America B.C." by Barry
Fell, he has identified the similarities
between many of the
Native American Indian Tribes, Africans, European, and South American
language. For example:
----------------------------------The
Libyan's-------------------------The
Zuni Indian's
----------------------------------The
Egyptian's-----------------------The
Mic Mac Indian's
----------------------------------The Iberic's (Northern
Africa)-------The
Pima Indian's
----------------------------------The Basque and
Celts---------------The
Algonquin Indian's
----------------------------------South American
Indian's-------------The
Iroquois Indian's
There are also complex linguistic relationships many other Indian Tribes and peoples from around the world. Just the language alone should be enough proof but some peoples seems to require a little more proof. To me they fail to see the obvious. So here's some more proof; At Inyo County, (California), the Valley of Fire, Allan Springs, Logomarsino, Keyhole Canyon, Washoe and Hickison Summit Pass (Nevada), Mesa Verde (Colorado), Mimbres Valley (New Mexico) and Tipper Canoe (Indiana) Islamic Petrogyphics exist. These particular rock drawings were diagrams and charts that represented an old Muslim Schools System, The language of instruction was North African Arabic written with old Kufic Arabic script. The subjects of instruction included; reading, writing, arithmetic, religion, history, geography, astronomy, mathematics, and sea navigation.
The written history (mainstream history) of America (Muu-Lan) and the America's is as misleading as the peoples who wrote it, it is a collection of lies, deceit, denial, and deliberate mis-truths. It is a deliberate plan to keep peoples of color, non-Europeans, or people of other racial origin, inferior to those of the European and/or Caucasian origin. How can sane people possibly believe that a European and/or Caucasian race of people's were the only ones to start successful civilizations in America, and the rest of the world as well? The archaeological and fossil proof tells us that they were certainly not.
How can any sane person believe that Christopher Columbus was the first "so-called" civilized person to discover America (the America's) in 1,492 A.D. When South America, Central America, and Mexico are connected to Northern America? Despite the lies you heard; South America, Central America, and Mexico were not populated after Northern America and Canada was. These ancient lands were populated by descendants of MU, Lemuria, and Atlantis, long before the Ice finally receded in Northern America. They were not covered with Ice when Northern America and Canada was, and when the Ice finally receded in Northern America and Canada (around 11 to 10,000 B.C.) they were some of the first peoples to re-migrate there.
How can anyone believe that Columbus was the first oceanic navigator to arrive in America, after traveling thousands of miles, when the peoples of the Caribbean Islands, Mexico, South and Central America, and Siberia were only a few miles away? Those people did not need an ocean crossing ship or vessel, all they required was a Drift Log. Furthermore how can anyone believe that Columbus was the first man in all of Earth's recorded history (prior to his voyage) to successfully navigate an ocean? Why do so many so-called historian's acknowledge the records of Columbus, while they openly, forcefully, and blindly deny others? Like the Phoenicians.
How can some of you "so-called" historian's continue to ignore ancient artifacts and records that prove the existence of oceanic voyages of cultures thousands of years prior to Columbus? Blacks owned about one million square miles of land in the "Louisiana Territories" and the South Eastern and Florida region, as well as California. In all these areas of the U.S., there were the Black African American nations that existed before Columbus' arrival.
When you hear of such evidence on
television programs or documentaries
you always hear the
narrator say; "could this be true", or "did they arrive first". Many
believe this to be an innocent
reaction to the overwhelming evidence put forth to such peoples, but
it's not. This type of media
response is a deliberate denial of the truth, and a constant brain
washing of the public, by the media.
It is an deliberate attempt to hide the truth for the sake of their
own so-called and false racial
superiority. Then they act innocently about it all.